Preview

Arab and Seljuk Conquests of the Middle East: A Comparative Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arab and Seljuk Conquests of the Middle East: A Comparative Study
1. Compare the Arab and Seljuk conquests of the Middle East. How did each group of conquerors control their own followers and supporters and govern their new subjects? Can these conquests be put into a long-term context? Hint: don’t dwell overlong on sequences of events, though it is fine if you want to examine an event as part of a broader analysis of a larger historical process.

The history of the Middle East tells a story of continuous conquer and seemingly
One cannot help but recall the Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun, and detect his analysis of historical cycles in the all but systematic rise and fall of ruling forces within this region of the world. Two influential ruling states of the Middle East, the Arab empire and Seljuk empire, inevitably fell prey to the vicious cycle of conquer. From their rise to power to their stance on ruling conquered peoples to their inevitable demise, the Arab and Seljuk empires shared many similarities. Yet, there were also many vast differences that made their respective periods of reign immensely different. The Islamic empire began its conquest in about the seventh century, CE. This came directly on the back of a recent decline in the ruling power of several major empires. The Roman empire in the west and the Sasanian empire to the north and east were growing ever weaker. Illness and plague had torn through these empires, especially Rome. Such high mortality rates ravaged these ruling states, leaving political and economic arenas in ruins. Yet, plague was not the only thing working against the Roman and Sasanian empires. They were also setting each other up for disaster. For many, many years the late Roman empire and Sasanian empire had been fighting relentlessly for the land north of the Arabian Peninsula. However, since neither side volunteered to back down and give up the land that was so important to both of them, the end result was merely these major empires beating up each other for years. On



Links: can be made between the way in which each ruling state governed conquered peoples. The Arabs did not force their authority upon the groups of people they had conquered in the ways that past empires had. The Arabs were tolerant of other religions and cultures. They did not force groups to change their beliefs or assimilate to Arab lifestyles. Instead they allowed practice of any monotheistic religion, , and established garrison towns to separate Arab armies from the people they had conquered. Although, as with any empire, the Arabs had their own wellbeing foremost in their minds, they did give the people they ruled many individual choices that were not available in most previous empires. Similarly, the Seljuks also established a much more lax governance than usual. After the Seljuk victory at the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, hordes of nomadic tribes began to spill into the newly Seljuk-controlled lands of Anatolia. However, instead of forcing these tribes to settle into towns, so as to be able to implement their control more easily and efficiently, the Seljuks allowed them to remain nomadic and establish themselves wherever they pleased. Finally, the way in which each respective empire mounted their decline and fall was strikingly akin. By the middle to late 800’s, the Islamic empire began to show rifts in their social and political structures. Problems started to arise between the caliphate and several groups within the empire. The army, which by this time consisted mainly of mamluk soldiers, began losing loyalty and often manipulated the caliph to satisfy their own interests. The caliph had also lost legitimate control over governors of various states. These governors paid no attention to the fact that they were still technically under the rule of the caliphate. They refused to return to Baghdad after their allotted time of governance and even began to appoint their sons as successors. The governors had become rulers of their own small states in virtually every way. Conflict also arose with the ulama over the created or eternal nature of the Qur’an. In turn, several religiously motivated rebellion groups began gaining power and taking over land. The Buyids, who were Twelver Shi’ites, conquered most of Iraq and Iran, and even took over Baghdad in 945, though they did not kill the caliph. The Fatimids were another group, although they were Sevener Shi’ites. They conquered Egypt and the surrounding lands, building and establishing the city of Cairo as their capital. With these various groups controlling vast areas of land while strongly opposing each other, the empire was weak and very vulnerable to invasion and conquer. In a similar way, the Seljuks were divided from within before their inevitable demise. After the conquests of Arp Arsalon and his predecessors, the Sultan Malik Shah established a golden age for Seljuk rule. However, this lasted no more than Malik Shah’s lifetime. When he died, it was unclear who of his many sons was to become the next sultan. They began a great debate over the subject, never truly reaching an agreement. Finally, the sons of Malik Shah split the empire into pieces, formed several small Seljuk states. However, it did not end there. Since several sons believed themselves to be legitimate heirs of the entire Seljuk empire, the various states continually fought between one another, exhausting military forces and further weakening Seljuk rule. By the time the Crusaders entered the Seljuks’ land from the west (and, in time, the Mongols from the east) the divided Seljuk empire was not strong enough to properly defend themselves. Although the similarities between the Arab and Seljuk empires are strikingly clear, there were also several major elements that separate the two ruling powers. First was their control of pastoral tribes. The Arab empire, through the bond established by the introduction of Islam, united all nomadic pastoral tribes under one rule and created a group feeling that kept them loyal to the governing power of the empire. The Seljuks, on the other hand, established no firm rule over nomadic tribes. When Anatolia was conquered in 1071, great masses of nomadic tribes flooded into the region. However, the Seljuks made no effort to organize or settle these tribes so as to establish a better rule over them. Instead, they allowed the tribes to remain nomadic. Another difference is each respective empire’s use of the Islamic religion. Islam was the binding force for the Arabs. It was what allowed for such a strong group feeling to be established. However, once they began to conquer other peoples, there was no desire to convert those people to Islam. In the eyes of the Arab people, being a Muslim gave a person a higher sense of personal and social status. Yet, if they were to convert large masses of non-Arab people to Islam, it would lose much of its superiority. The Seljuks did not feel this way at all. As converts themselves, spreading Islam as widely as possible could only benefit them. This is the reason that a huge amount of people converted to Islam immediately after the fall of the Islamic empire and into the Seljuks’ reign. Conquest and power shifts can be seen in every era of Middle Eastern history. Two such conquering forces were those of the Arabs and the Seljuks. Many striking links can be made between these two groups. From their rise to power to their governing approach to their demise, the Islamic and Seljuk empires followed a very similar path. Yet, they were in other senses very different authorities as well. This can be seen when contrasting their actions with nomadic tribes as well as their use of the religion of Islam. Both the Arabs and Seljuks were great ruling powers in the Middle East. They both played a significant role in the history of one of the most interesting areas of the world.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hisory Dbq

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After reviewing these documents, it is clear that the Islamic civilization was able to besiege such an extensive empire by spreading the Islamic belief throughout various methods. Throughout these documents, Islam is shown to spread quickly because of the Muslim’s respect toward other people’s religion. Furthermore, Muslims also used war and battle to grow the Islamic empire and reach other lands. Finally, the Islamic civilization practiced a moral principle – equality – to encompass an extensive empire of the Islamic belief.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Late Antique Period

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Religion, specifically the rise and evolution of Abrahamic monotheism (Christianity, rabbinic Judaism, and Islam), is the defining characteristic, of this era. Religions of the Late Antique period were linked with power and entered into a weird dance between politics and faith. Imperial monotheism served as a rallying cry and the building block of empires. Religion was used equally as a tool for salvation, either of the individual or the community, and to justify law. Constantine and the Christians, the Jews of the Himyarite Dynasty in Arabia, the Manicheists who tried to court the Persians, and even the Zoroastrians who were keen to court their Iranian overlords, all sought to solidify their power, control, and government over regions of conquered peoples by using religion as an emulsifier of different tribal/cultural groups and a tool of state control. Each religion created empires of varying sizes and strength that were bound by the socio-political idea of religion and conversion of the conquered (especially in the case of Christianity). In this light, Islam did not seal the end of Late Antiquity, but rather continued one of its most famous features: conquest and expansion using religion as a justification. The Islamic conquests, so often viewed as the ending of Late Antique era, fit precisely into this mold. By conquering new peoples and forcing their conversion to Islam as a way to strengthen…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Turks carried Islam to new regions, including northern India and Anatolia; played an increasingly important role in the heartland of an established Islamic civilization, as the Seljuk Turks became the de facto power behind the Abbasid caliphate in the Middle East; and carved important empires out of…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The non Arab people felt “unhappy with the fact that Muslim rulers lived a life of luxury while the majority of Muslims lived in poverty.” Acrobatiq (2014 ) Now with the split they needed a new leader and they found Abu Muslim. Abu Muslim army defeated the Umayyad army and ended the Umayyad dynasty. During the Abbasid period the Islam started moving into Central Asia, western Chinia, southeast Europe, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. . Acrobatiq (2014 ) With the Muslims moving all over, it made them the rulers. They ended up the rulers of “most trade routes in the Eastern Hemisphere, including land routes that stretched between the Iberian Peninsula, North Africa, West and East Africa, the Middle East, Asia Minor, and India.” Acrobatiq (2014 ) the Abbasid Dynasty grow by trading goods and moving place to place. For example “Muslim merchants traveled to Southeast Asia to trade African ebony and ivory and fine Egyptian cotton for commodities such as Chinese porcelain, silk, and spices”. Acrobatiq (2014…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 632, the death of Muhammad would begin the time when Muslim armies would conquer lands throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and Spain to establish Islamic ruled empires called caliphates that would last until 1258. The major Islamic ruled empires during this time that lasts about six centuries would be the Umayyad Caliphate (661-750) and the Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258), and these early Islamic empires would undergo many continuities and changes throughout their long existence. While Islamic culture and interaction with other empires and people endured for the Islamic Empires between the years 632 and 1258, the politics of the Islamic Empires during this time would instead adjust.…

    • 911 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between the years of 622 and 750 AD, the early Islamic Empire expanded rapidly, taking control of most of the Middle East. While the expansion of the Islamic empire has had a large impact in the present day, there are still many arguments on how the early Islamic Empire expanded. The following essay will prove that the early Islamic Empire expanded by defeating all enemies in their path and conquering all land possible.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal societies all relied on bureaucracies that drew inspiration from the steppe traditions of Turkish and Mogol people and from the heritage of Islam, they adopted similar policies, they looked for ways to keep peace in their societies which were made up of different religious and ethnic backgrounds, and they were associated with literary and artistic talents. Military and religious factors gave rise to all three of these empires.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the seventh and eighth century the Byzantine Empire was overwhelmed by Arab attacks resulting in the loss of Syria, Egypt and North Africa. The swift loss of the Empire’s lands and the continuous Arab sieges on Constantinople appeared to be signs of the end of the Byzantine Empire. In the late ninth and tenth centuries however this had changed, surprisingly within these centuries the Byzantine Empire experienced a period of revival. It was a period of increased trade and prosperity, a revival of the Empire’s economy. The Byzantine’s military had begun a process of transformation through new military tactics and reorganisation which made it a formidable fighting force. Simultaneously as these changes occurred, the Abbasid Caliphate had weakened significantly; a slave revolt and political divisions resulted in the split of the Abbasid Caliphate into three smaller Caliphates. The combined factors resulted in the expansion of the Byzantine Empire in the east in the late ninth and tenth centuries.…

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the history of the middle east, strong individual leaders have been forging the path for their nations. Three leaders in particular, Jamal Abd An-Nasser, Menachin Begin, and King Faisal I have all had a particularly significant…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ottoman’s diplomacy played a significant role in its conquest and expansion. The Ottoman Empire conducted its external affairs based on the idea of Dar al-Islam (the abode of Islam) versus Dar al-Harb (the abode of the infidels) which in result placed the Ottomans in permanent state of war. Diplomacy, being a term related to the peace keeping between the nations, is somewhat inappropriate for the Ottoman Empire. Nonetheless their view and approach towards the external affairs greatly influenced their magnificent expansion. Founded by ghazis, the warriors devoted to the expansion of Islam in infidel lands and strived for conquest, the Ottomans held stubbornly to the idea of Islam’s superiority over Christian Europe. As a result the Empire was organized upon the principles of ghazi, continuously declaring and leading a war against unbelievers. The Ottoman Empire strived for conquest and expansion from its very beginning. Filled with ghazi energy, the Ottomans had to continuously expand, capture new territories,…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assyrian Empire

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Assyrians were a sematic tribes in the area of Mesopotamia (present day Iraq) that lived between the late 25th century and 605 B.C. Due to the extensive period of their existence, they passed through many kings. They are also considered an extremely brutal race of warriors who conquered much of the near east which affected their trading and allies over the many centuries of their existence. The majority of this essay will be focused on the hierarchy, government and trade of the Assyrian kingdom from 950 B.C to 609 B.C.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    a) Include the importance of preserving classical texts of Greece, Mediterranean, and the Middle East.…

    • 4750 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Casale emphasizes that the beginning of the Ottoman’s expansion era can be attributed to Sultan Selim and his initial invasion of the Mamluk Empires holding of Egypt, although it is unknown as to why this was done it would eventually double the empire making the Ottomans the most powerful Islamic state in the world.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mahdist State in Sudan

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mahdist uprising in the Sudan is an event overlooked by in many throughout history. To many it was just a hiccup in Great Britains conquest of the African states in the east. The uprising was in fact a failure but what makes it so significant is the ability of the Mahdi, Muhammad Ahmed to unite a divided people against a common enemy using modern logistics and combining it with religious zeal. The author of The Mahdist State in the Sudan, P.M. Holt is one of the few historians to provide readers with a detailed survey of the entire Mahdist incident in Sudan from before it started to after Mahdi’s successor is killed. The issue with Holt’s book is that since it is one of the few sources on the subject, many people will revere his findings as the absolute truth instead of critically analyzing any bias that maybe present or some significant theme that he may have overlooked. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Holt’s account of the Mahdist state from the previous events that influenced the uprsing, to the Mahdist’s rule and finally the failure of his successor, “The Khalifa”.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kéchichian, J. A., 2008. 'Creation and cohesion ' in Power and succession in Arab monarchies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.…

    • 4686 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays