Preview

Anti-Death Sentence Argumentative Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Death Sentence Argumentative Analysis
The argument of “ morally unacceptable”, but after reading stories like this it makes you think twice about it. All the anti-death sentence arguments of “Killing People Because They Killed People to Show That Killing People Is Wrong”, Is just nonsense if you really think about it. That if he/she doesn't get punished for it, it will happen again and again. The “ hypocrisy”, makes sure that they don't do it again, and if so they will know the consequence. Think of “Katy Davis”, who was abducted by a man who was “on parole for a previous murder”, is just wrong to not let them out to do this again. This wouldn't have happened if the laws against murder have been strict. She wouldn't have been “beaten, gang-raped”, and she could live out the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty Justice For None Analysis
    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Death Penalty Justice For None Analysis

    The tittle “The Death Penalty: Justice for None” the author provokes a feeling to the readers of compassion and empathy making it seem like the death penalty is completely ignorant and wrong no matter what the consequence of the criminal is. The authors opinion about the death penalty is that the death penalty in the united states shouldn’t even be considered an option because it is cruel and unjust.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Murder Is A Tricky Business
    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Murder Is A Tricky Business

    It is a personal choice to argue from so called moral grounds – but saying “it’s a personal choice” doesn’t lend one’s position inherent validity, for arguing from a secondary definition of morality can be a tricky business when your secondary definition of morality is at odds with and ignores the natural law that governs universal moral norms. To argue from a secondary position of morality as you implied you define it lends greater moral weight to the life of the murderer than to the lives of his victims…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why The Death Penalty Needs To Die Analysis
    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why The Death Penalty Needs To Die Analysis

    In his article Why The Death Penalty Needs To Die, Gillespie mentions that in California alone, $4 billion dollars was spent on administering death penalty cases between 1980 and 2012. That is a lot of money that was wasted on something so useless. In Here's Why We Need to Kill the Death Penalty, Senator Daylin Leach states how unaffordable it is to process, try, and carry out a death penalty sentencing. So much money is spent on the death penalty. Billions and billions of dollars are spent just to have the death penalty. The country is in debt enough as it is. The average case costs about $740,000. With cases that aim for the death penalty it costs around $1.26 million. It costs $90,000 dollars more in taxpayer money to manage a prisoner on…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Retribution And The Death Penalty
    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Retribution And The Death Penalty

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    5 point argument about death penalty
    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5 point argument about death penalty

    My point: In order to minimize wrongful executions the cost of capital murder cases leading to the death penalty are much more costly to taxpayers then cases leading to life in prison. By minimizing these expenses more resources can be spent on solving and curtailing other crimes.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis
    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reiman's Argumentative Essay: Against The Death Penalty
    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reiman's Argumentative Essay: Against The Death Penalty

    While evil gives us the right to punish the wrongdoer with retribution, does it follow that we should act on this right? Death penalty system is recognized as the world's most severe punishment for offenders because it has a direct denial of the right to live of criminals, and depriving prisoner’s opportunity to go back compensate the victims. Reiman's article "against the death penalty," he begins with a brief summary of his ideas to death the four positions, and then he goes into more detail for each person. The first point he made that: "Although the death penalty is a just punishment for some murderers, it is unfair to punish the perpetrators less stringent (reduced to a certain limit)." In his first premise, he shows how the most accepted…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Death Penalty Argument Outline
    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Death Penalty Argument Outline

    CONTEXT: Mr. Keyes is a Roman Catholic who is pro-choice but also believes that the death penalty is essential in some cases. Both men agree that abortion and the death penalty are on different levels and cannot be compared to each other. Mr. Keyes compares women’s rights to abortion to that of a slave holder, in the sense that “black” people were not developed enough and could be bought and sold is the same concept of a baby not born is not developed enough and could be killed at will.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Debate on the death penalty
    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Debate on the death penalty

    “We’re only ­human, we all make mistakes." The death penalty has been the highest form of criminal punishment in the American judicial system since the 13 colonies. There has been many forms of the death penalty like hanging, stoning, drowning, burning, beheading, gasing, electrocution, and injection. The taking of a man's life as punishment for criminal behavior is wrong. The moral injustice of murder, the cruelty of execution, and the death of innocent men are all concerns that make the death penalty wrong. The government should abolish the death penalty in order to observe morality, end cruelty, and protect innocent men. What is the death penalty?…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Let The Death Penalty Debate
    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Let The Death Penalty Debate

    James Eagan Holmes was described as a quiet, standoffish, 24-year-old graduate student from San Diego who had earned a bachelor's degree in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside. Holmes then enrolled at the University of Colorado in June of 2011, taking graduate courses in neuroscience at the university's campus in Denver. He later dropped out of a doctoral program at the University's medical school, where he had been doing research.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Death Penalty Essay
    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Progressive Death Penalty Essay

    Today I came across a discussion on the death penalty on a progressive Facebook page. The post was in favor of execution, which was interesting to me because this is not the progressive position. In fact progressive position is staunchly opposed to the death penalty.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use The Death Penalty
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use The Death Penalty

    die because they murdered someone that's why we have the life sentence or high security prisons. I don’t understand why the government should have decision on who should live and who shall perish . It's a very unusual and cruel punishment and the United States should retire using it.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Cases
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Death Penalty Cases

    The controversy surrounding the death penalty is an issue that has no end in sight. For the worst-of-the-worst, the people who have committed the most heinous crimes, some feel as though there is no better suited punishment than the most severe, death. However, the opposing side often brings up arguments the logic in punishing a murderer with murder, and how much justice could actually be achieved, or whether the initial wrong has faced at all justice through capital punishment. When talking about the death penalty, the infamous hardened criminals like Ted Bundy, or John Wayne Gacy come to mind for most people. Many people find the crimes punishable by death to be so atrocious that capital punishment is the only logical option, but what happens…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Argumentative Analysis: Death Penalty System
    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Argumentative Analysis: Death Penalty System

    Sophia Snyder has had a long history of battling with the mental illness of schizophrenia. One afternoon, she drowned her four young children in a bathtub. She went on trial for capital murder charges and all of the mental health experts agreed that she suffered from schizophrenia when she had committed the murders but they all disagreed that the schizophrenia left her unable to know the difference between right and wrong. The state of Olympus implements and uses the M’Naghten test for insanity which requires the defendant to prove that she did not know the quality and nature of her acts and did not know in acting such a way was wrong. Since the mental health experts…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics