Preview

The Death Penalty Argument Outline

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Argument Outline
Argument Outline
Jennifer Hopes
Ashford University: PHI 103
Informal Logic
Ed Teall
08/23/2014

CONTEXT: Mr. Keyes is a Roman Catholic who is pro-choice but also believes that the death penalty is essential in some cases. Both men agree that abortion and the death penalty are on different levels and cannot be compared to each other. Mr. Keyes compares women’s rights to abortion to that of a slave holder, in the sense that “black” people were not developed enough and could be bought and sold is the same concept of a baby not born is not developed enough and could be killed at will.
THE ISSUE: Mr. Keyes compares women’s rights to that of a slave holder.
THE CONCLUSION: Abortion and the death penalty are on different levels
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson: a Defense of Abortion Essay Example
    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Judith Jarvis Thomson: a Defense of Abortion Essay Example

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mary Anne Warren Abortion Is Morally Permissible
    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mary Anne Warren Abortion Is Morally Permissible

    Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Abortion " Matters of Life and Death Casts Dispersions on Both Pro-Abortion and Anti-Abortion Debates"
    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Abortion " Matters of Life and Death Casts Dispersions on Both Pro-Abortion and Anti-Abortion Debates"

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Death Sentence Argumentative Analysis
    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti-Death Sentence Argumentative Analysis

    The argument of “ morally unacceptable”, but after reading stories like this it makes you think twice about it. All the anti-death sentence arguments of “Killing People Because They Killed People to Show That Killing People Is Wrong”, Is just nonsense if you really think about it. That if he/she doesn't get punished for it, it will happen again and again. The “ hypocrisy”, makes sure that they don't do it again, and if so they will know the consequence. Think of “Katy Davis”, who was abducted by a man who was “on parole for a previous murder”, is just wrong to not let them out to do this again. This wouldn't have happened if the laws against murder have been strict. She wouldn't have been “beaten, gang-raped”, and she could live out the…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Retribution And The Death Penalty
    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Retribution And The Death Penalty

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing The Controversial Issue Of The Death Penalty
    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Analyzing The Controversial Issue Of The Death Penalty

    Capital punishment has always been a huge controversial issue in the United States. Some states have legalized this punishment while others do not agree and sentence defendants to life in prison instead. Capital punishment, or the death penalty is a legal sentence to die for criminal behavior. It varies from state to state how the execution of the convicted criminal is carried out. Just like every controversial issue there is always two viewpoints. The first is that law enforcement and juries make errors and capital punishment cannot be reversed. The second is that certain crimes are so heinous that the perpetrator deserves to die. There are many pros and cons related to the death penalty. The question has always been, do psychopaths with no regard for human life deserve to live or should they be put to death with the same coldness that they showed to their victims.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis
    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Death Penalty Argumentative Analysis

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kill or Be Killed: the Death Penalty in America
    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kill or Be Killed: the Death Penalty in America

    Gary Gilmore was executed on January 17, 1977 for going on a killing spree. He was shot in an old wooden chair by prison guards behind the state prison in Utah. Gilmore was the first person ever to be executed in the United States (Bole, W., 2009). The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is when someone is put to death for committing a heinous crime such as rape or murder. Think about that for a moment. A person is killed for killing someone else. Is killing the murderer not just as bad as the murderer killing their victim? It is like mothers everywhere used to say, “Two wrongs do not make a right”. The death penalty is wrong because it costs taxpayers way too much money, they could have the wrong guy, there is a risk of it being botched, and it just prolongs the suffering of the prisoner 's family.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Abortion Is Immoral Analysis
    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Abortion Is Immoral Analysis

    In his article, Why Abortion is Immoral, Don Marquis argues that abortion is seriously morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases (2012). The exceptions Marquis makes for when abortion is permissible include, in instances of rape, when the pregnancy could threaten the woman’s life, when the fetus is anencephalic, and during the first fourteen days after conception (2012). In his argument, Marquis attempts to bypass the traditional abortion debate which has largely focused on whether or not the fetus is a person (2012). By explaining why killing in general is wrong, Marquis will seek to prove that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult because it robs them of their future (2012).…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty
    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On Pro Death Penalty

    The death penalty is an extremely controversial topic in America, and people usually shy away from it, but speaking about controversial topics can help us come close to actually find solutions. This exercise was conducted in my survey of law class in which, we had gone over several homicide cases in which the criminal received the death penalty. In the end of the lesson, our teacher asked a simple question “raise your hand if you believe in the death penalty”. I was appalled to see that more than half believed it was worth it. In my mind it was clear that even though that person could have murdered another human being, we have no jurisdiction to kill them, and we would be no better as civilized being if we killed him.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against The Death Penalty
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Argument Against The Death Penalty

    Everyone has their views and opinions on the death penalty. They are either for it or against it, but what does that really mean? Sixty-three percent of the population of America are for it because a human being killed another human and they think that it is only fair that the defendant also dies. Then the other thirty-seven percent are against it either because it may have been a loved one that had killed someone and they do not want to see their loved one be killed or they think that killing the person that killed the other person does not give the victim any justice because that they are already dead. (U.S. Death Penalty). But what most people do not know is why or how the death penalty was originated, or why they ended most of the death penalty. The death penalty is painted vividly as immoral and insufficient, while others…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Controversial Issue Of Anti-Abortion
    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Controversial Issue Of Anti-Abortion

    If slavery is now wrong, what makes abortion right? Both are morally wrong. Bissonnette brings up post- abortion syndrome, the personal struggle (psychological, emotional physical and spiritual) to work through thoughts and feelings about an abortion; this can be experienced by both men and women. He believes post-abortion syndrome is real, but there are doubts, “I’m sure that post-abortion syndrome is real, but studies shows only 10 to 20 percent of women suffer long-term psychological effects. Given the gravity and scale of abortion, one would expect that it would be of an order and magnitude that would overwhelm. It is not. Millions of mothers and fathers have aborted their children and then continued on with their lives” (1). On the opposing side, E.M. Dadlez and William L. Andrews wrote “Post-Abortion Syndrome: Creating an Affliction”, both believe that post-abortion syndrome is fictional. “Post-abortion syndrome purports to establish that abortion psychologically harms women and, indeed, can harm persons associated with women who have abortions. Thus, harms that abortion is alleged to produce are multiplied” (Dadlez, Williams…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use The Death Penalty
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should The United States Use The Death Penalty

    die because they murdered someone that's why we have the life sentence or high security prisons. I don’t understand why the government should have decision on who should live and who shall perish . It's a very unusual and cruel punishment and the United States should retire using it.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Controversy Surrounding The Death Penalty

    Did you know that 1,432 people have been executed since 1976? Capital punishment, aka the death penalty has claimed countless lived since it’s establishment in the United States in 1608. Executions happen pretty often, with 38 people being killed last year alone. The death penalty is an unnecessary and horrible punishment which should not be allowed.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement For Death Penalty Research Paper
    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Thesis Statement For Death Penalty Research Paper

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics