Running head: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS
Advantages and disadvantages of individual rights and public order
University of Phoenix
Advantages and disadvantages of individual rights and public order Every human being deserves to have Individual rights and they are a very important part of the justice system. Without individual rights things would be chaotic therefore, public order is brought into the system so that everyone’s individual rights are in place for each individual to use as a backbone for guidelines of what is acceptable and what is not. Although, there are disadvantages and advantages of both individual rights and public order they are still very essential to maintain order. Individual rights are distinct from civil or legal rights as these are rights granted by government to citizens and will vary with the organization and administration of governments. Individual rights identify a boundary of just social interaction in presence or absence of government (Wikipedia). Many people do not realize all the advantages that America gives us. The Bill of Rights is the backbone to what freedom is all about. The purpose of a Bill of Rights is to prevent anyone from violating the rights of anyone else. So long as they respect the rights of others, U.S. citizens are given personal freedom at birth. These rights are common to every person and are not considered as being created by any government agency. For every individual, a right is the moral of a positive, of his freedom to act on his own judgment, to set his own goals, by his own voluntary choice. The Constitution of the United States lists all the rights that each individual can expect. Each amendment was created to protect individual rights of every citizen and to limit the power that is held by The Federal Government. Individual rights are inalienable which means, anyone or the government did not transfer them to you. The state did not give you rights nor can they take them away (except for someone who violates another person’s rights, ex. Criminal) (rational view). Think about the right to free speech, religion, assembly, the press, etc. Does anyone else have to sacrifice any portion of his or her lives or any property in order for you to enjoy these rights? No. Nobody has to give up anything of his or her lives or any of their property in order for our government to protect our right to say what we want, pray how we want, and gather with whom we want or read a free press. The United States has several laws, which protect a citizen’s individual rights in order to live a life of freedom and happiness. Although there are some disadvantages to ensuring the individual rights of one person. In order to protect one person’s individual rights, from time to time, the rights or freedom of others may be infringed on. While ensuring that every citizen’s individual rights are protected there are some disadvantages to the greater majority in order to protect these rights.
Some examples of protecting individual rights may be the right of an accused person receives free counsel if he or she is accused of a crime. At face value this may seem like a proper and fair law to many. Most people may feel that ensuring an accused gets free legal counsel if he or she is being investigated or charged with a crime may be a fair and adequate law. When a person is advised of their Miranda Rights, he or she is informed that, “You have the right to speak to an attorney and have an attorney present during questing,’ and “if you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to you free of charge.” This is a benefit to a person if he or she cannot provide himself or herself with an attorney, but there is a disadvantage to others. These court appointed attorneys are paid for using U.S. tax dollars. Meaning the public’s taxes is used to protect the rights of another. Repeat offenders who have shown over years that he or she does...
References: D 'Augostino, F. (2008) "Contemporary Approaches to the Social Contract". Retrieved August 9,
2010, from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy website:
Legal Information Institute. (N.D.). Miranda vs. Arizona. Retrieved August 12, 2010,
McKay, W. (n.d.) "The Philosophy of Law Enforcement." Retrieved August 9, 2010 from Police
Reform website: http://www.policereform.org/
Mill, J. S. (1869). On Liberty. London,: Longman, Roberts, and Green.
U.S. Constitution Online. (N.D.). The Miranda Warning. Retrieved August 12, 2010,
Please join StudyMode to read the full document