Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Individual Rights Advocates & Public Order Advocates

Satisfactory Essays
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Individual Rights Advocates & Public Order Advocates
When people are viewing the criminal justice system, they typically choose to look at the system in two ways. Some people think their individual rights are taken away in certain situations. These people are known as individual rights advocates. While others believe that for the sake of society, individual rights can be overruled. These people are known as public order advocates. These two beliefs conflict with each other because even though every person has individual rights, sometimes their rights are overlooked when thinking about public safety. Some people like the idea of public safety even if some of their rights are taken away. However, others feel violated when their rights are ignored, including in safety situations. The public order advocates main purpose is to protect society’s law abiding citizens from harm. These people believe that under certain circumstances involving a criminal threat to public safety, the interests of society should take precedence over individual rights. In my opinion, I feel that the public order advocates are more important to the overall well-being of society because I think people should have their rights overlooked when putting safety first. For example, after 9/11 security at the airport had the authority to profile certain ethnic groups and subject to body search on all individuals. Some people would say this is a violation of their individual rights. While others understand it’s for everyone’s safety. Another example where public order advocates takes precedence over individual rights is when a pedophile is released back into society his or her rights are limited due to the nature of their crime. Depending on the severity of the crime, some sex offenders have to wear a monitoring bracelet, live a certain distance from schools, and people in the neighborhood are notified when one moves in. The pedophile might think this is a violation of their individual rights but it’s only to protect the public. The individual rights advocates consist of people who seek to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. These people feel that their individual rights should not be violated under any circumstances. For example, at the airport when security is screening individuals, people feel that their privacy is being violated. An individual rights advocate views it as an assault on basic human dignity and individual liberty. These believers are more concerned about their own rights rather than the safety of society. Overall In my opinion the public order advocates are more important to the overall well-being of society. I believe this is more important because in today’s world there is a greater risk of terrorism and crime. Innocent people need to be protected even if people’s rights have to be overlooked. In all reality it is the criminal that takes away the rights and privileges of a law abiding citizen.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Using the media to manage the appearance of the system’s legitimacy, the public is continually bombarded with myths until the myths become accepted as facts. The criminal justice system can provide the public with select information, which creates the perception that the status quo must be maintained. Police can effectively create their own jobs by persuading the public to support their current…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, criminal justice is generally society's "last line of defense" against people who refuse to abide by dominant social values and commit crimes. Usually, society turns to criminal justice only after other institutions of social control have failed.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Policy Anaysis Ii

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The criminal justice system of the United States remains influenced because of probable cause, police discretion, and judicial discretion concerning criminal misconduct. This material reviews the history of policing, and the court system. This examination analyzes probable cause, police discretion, and how these components influence law enforcement and the courts. Additionally, this assessment reviews the influence for law enforcement, studies police operations, and observes various decision-making processes. Furthermore, this investigation scrutinizes the judicial discretion process, reviews different influences for the courts, reviews diverse court operations, and examines other decision-making processes.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, there are two main competing models of justice, the Due Process Model, and the Crime Control Method. The Due Process Model (DPM) is known as obstacle course justice with an ideology that relies on the formal structure of the law and legal guilt. The DPM’s primary goals are to protect the due process rights of the accused and limiting the powers of the state. It runs completely with an underlying assumption of innocence, making it not so effective at all times. The Crime Control Method (CCM), on the other hand is known as assembly line justice. It has an ideology that centers on efficiency and effectiveness of the system and factual guilt. The CCM’s primary goals are to protect society from crime and to control the behavior of the community. This process uses and informal fact finding process through the police and prosecutors. Also contrary to the DPM the CCM operates under a presumption of guilt. The CCM of justice is focused on detaining the accused and securing convictions, making it very effective in preventing crime however somehow you have to step on some toes. These two models and methods occur all the time in the criminal justice system we see today, and there is much controversy behind which process should dominate. In 1984 Sherman and Berk published their overall case study on “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault”. This study supported a more CCM ideology of justice. However in 1988 Binder and Meeker published an article critiquing the methods and conclusions of the original study, offering a counterpoint.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This case is one that changed the way the United States Police forces will work forever. Every human in the world has natural born rights. Even people who have been arrested have rights, ‘The rights of the accused’. These rights are the main point of this court case.…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual-rights advocate is someone who seeks to protect personal freedoms within the process of criminal justice. Their nature is to hold true what is written on the Constitution. A public-order advocate is someone who believes that under certain circumstances involving a criminal threat to public safety, the interests of society should take precedence over individual rights. Since September 11, 2001, many questions about individual rights versus public safety have arisen. The Patriot Act affects foreign travelers more than anyone, as it denies due process to a foreign visitor. This is unconstitutional as the American Government is supposed to grant due process to everyone. Law enforcement agencies must still obtain a warrant to conduct surveillance but probable cause is more lenient than in the past. Many people believe individual rights should be sacrificed for public safety but that is a dangerous move as if government is not forced to abide by the policies and procedures set by the constitution then government can become corrupt. Individual rights will trump public safety but you can still maintain a peaceful society without denying individuals their rights guaranteed under the constitution.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It ignores the possibility of unremorseful offenders and unwilling victims, challenges the criminal justice system operation, undermines the law- that define crimes and send offenders to prison, as well as outline the rights that protect citizens from the government. Crime can ruin lives, destroy relationships, and a mediated conversation can’t heal every wound, or address the problem at large. It reduces the legitimacy of law, which citizens are required to abide by, and believe in. The lack of established process results in discrepancies in outcomes; refuting the idea of equality before the law. Objectivity is essential to due process, and working with the victim eliminates the possibility of legitimate and fair consequences. This includes both extremes, harsh punishment for a minor crime and or no punishment for a harsher crime. The decision rests in the hands of a common citizen, who is usually virtually uneducated of the process of law as compared to appointed justices. Justices are appointed to fairly evaluate the situation and proceed in accordance with the law, and restorative justice can give too much power in the hands of those in the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Society expects its police to look into reported crimes, collecting and protecting evidence, arresting suspects, and aiding the prosecution in getting a conviction. Next, is to preserve peace, by having to intervene in a nonviolent conduct by an individual in a public place. Then to prevent crime, which is to prevent crime before it occurs, such as, educational campaigns, preventing patrols, and community policing. Next, is to provide services, such as, counseling, referring social services, and to keep traffic moving. Finally, to uphold rights that includes respecting rights regardless of race, ethnicity, class, gender, and respecting individual Constitutional protections.…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As our society enters into the 21 century, a fine thin line exists between individual rights and public order. What is public order? Public order maintains crime control and social order. Public order takes superiority over individual rights. Without public order, society would not even have any human rights; because crime would tend to take over. The public must realize that some sacrifices of individual rights and liberties has to be made in order to achieve and maintain a safe, stable society in which the individual may exercise those rights (Inbau, 1999). However, public order has its advantages and disadvantages.…

    • 2544 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The American judicial system 's need for an effective strategy to combat crime has been a continuously debated issue. While employing the adversarial models of crime control and due process, America struggles to find balance on a pendulum between individual rights and social order. In this window of opportunity, crime control and due process are examined and reflected into the eyes of society.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Welch in Understanding American and California Government, states that “The declaration of independence proclaimed that all men are created equal” (448). In other words, all men were not formed equal in several respects, but they should be considered equal before the law. However, back on the eighteenth century many Americans believed that people had natural rights by the virtue of being human. In Richard Randall’s Introduction to American Government class, he stated that “Americans are very tolerant of civil liberties and democratic values. They only support the ideas for the individuals, groups, and ideas other groups support” (Randall). Civil liberties are important because it helps contain the power of the government to dictate how we behave. This ensures that our every day living is not interrupted by dependable statistics that may just try to intentionally cause harm. On the other hand, civil rights are also important because they protect us against unusual administrations whose goals are not to represent the people, but rather for their own sake.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statistics continue to reflect issues of disparity and discrimination within the American criminal justice system. The issues that affect the enforcement of laws and government policy can result in justice for the safety of society and/or justice that will single out members of society. With the diverse population living in the United States, stereotypical judgments and attitudes can influence and possibly overwhelm the direction of the criminal justice system. The American system of criminal justice is thought to…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle between social control and the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens can be seen in the Canadian Criminal Justice System of today. Many criticize policing institutions of possessing excessive power where others feel that they do not have enough. Some feel the police do too little where the others feel police are too much of an interference. The question of when it is acceptable to sacrifice social freedoms in hope of overall comes down to the question of which is more effective: due process or crime control? Is what more police what Canada needs to deal with its delinquents or is it more of the enforcing of our rights freedoms that is more important. This controversial issue plays a major role in the Canadian Criminal Justice System as it must come to a delicate compromise of social control and due process.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Citizens are being arrested every single day for an unlimited variety of reasons. The reason can be anything from abuse of a family member, robbery, drug possession, or murder. The criminal system has four ways to justify punishment. Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection are ways in which punishment is justified. Each of the four has its own style of punishment together with its own pros and cons for each Citizen.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Criminal procedure is the branch of American constitutional law concerned with the state’s power to maintain an orderly society and the rights of citizens and residents to live in freedom from undue government interference with their liberty” (Zalman, 2008, p. 4). The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth amendments are significant in studying criminal procedure. In criminal justice, the criminal procedure is important because it deals with the conflict between order and liberty directly. To understand the friction between order and liberty, Herbert Packer studied the competing values that underlie the constitutional order through the Due Process Model and Crime Control model. Both of these models have similarities as well as differences on shaping criminal procedure policy. Herbert Packer states, “One is not “good” and the other “bad”; both models embrace constitutional values that are necessary to the kind of society in which we wish to live” (Zalman, 2008, p. 5).…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays