Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

1905 Revolution Bloody Sunday

Good Essays
744 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1905 Revolution Bloody Sunday
The 1905 Revolution was caused primarily because of the events of the Bloody Sunday. How far do you agree with this statement? (10)

Although the Bloody Sunday was the immediate cause that kick-started the 1905 Revolution, there were many long-term and short-term causes that led up to it. The long-term causes include the weak rule of the Tsar, the large empire, and inequalities in the Russian society. The economic depression of 1900-1904 and the Russo-Japanese War were some of the short-term causes.
On 22nd January 1905, the Cossacks fired upon about 200,000 unarmed workers when they were petitioning outside the Tsar’s winter palace in St. Petersburg. This incident, which went on to be called Bloody Sunday, undermined the Tsar’s authority and increased support for the revolutionaries. It sparked a wave of riots and strikes by the peasants and workers against the landowners. 400,000 workers went on strike by the end of January. In June, sailors of the battleship Potemkin held a naval mutiny. The workers set up Soviets in towns, which were a huge threat to the Tsar’s power.
From the powerful Tsar and the nobility to the deprived peasants, Russia’s was a hierarchal and highly unequal society. The majority of its population was the landless peasants and workers. Serfdom had been abolished in the late 19th Century, but the peasants still had no rights to speak of. They worked under horrible conditions in fields that were not their own, with insufficient wages. The nobility or the landowners, a mere 1% of the population, were affluent and owned most of the land of the country. They had a lot of influence on how the country was ruled. The workers and peasants, quite understandably, found this very unfair and wanted change.
Nicholas II became the Tsar of Russia after his father was assassinated. He never wanted to, nor was he capable of, ruling an empire as large and diverse as Russia. There were many difficulties in ruling Russia, such as the huge amount of land the country had, with about 90% of it not arable and only one ice-free port (Vladivostok). The great size also meant that the Tsar had to rely on other people to look after his territory. The means of transport for going around the country were non-existent, making it even harder to rule. Also, the workers and peasants were unhappy with how unjust the society was and were unhappy with the Tsar for not bringing about any change. Tsar Nicholas was a weak ruler and could not handle all of these problems very well and this led to a lot of people opposing and criticizing him.
The economic depression in Russia from 1900-1904 was a short-term cause for the 1905 Revolution. Russia's industry had been growing at an enormous rate when in 1900, Russia was hit with a huge depression that led to widespread unemployment and dissatisfaction. There were widespread mass strikes throughout the major cities in the country. The Tsar failed at solving this problem and instead started a war with Japan to distract people from Russia’s internal problems.
The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 was started in the hopes that if Russia won the war, it will improve the Tsar’s reputation as well as divert people’s attention from Russia’s troubles. The Tsar was very sure that he will win the war against Japan, as he had a vast army unlike Japan. What he did not take into account was that Russia’s army was inefficient and barely modernized, while Japan had a modernized, proficient army. Russia ended up losing the war, which decreased the Tsar’s reputation even more. Russia was humiliated as she lost to a tiny Asian country like Japan. The government was exposed to be incompetent. The war also meant that the conditions of the workers worsened even further. Prices and taxes were increased to pay for resources for the war. There were food shortages, factory closures, and unemployment. The social unrest in the country was heightened.
It is not true that the Bloody Sunday was the primary cause of the 1905 Revolution. The weak Tsar Nicholas II, the difficulties of ruling Russia, the poor conditions of the workers and peasants along with the economic depression and the Russo-Japanese War were all instrumental in starting the Revolution. The Bloody Sunday triggered the 1905 Revolution, but many other factors also helped in causing it.

Suhasni
10B

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Nicholas II, the last tsar of Russia, had neither the qualities nor the desire to rule imperial Russia. Born in Tsarskoye Selo in 1868, Nicholas was the eldest son of Alexander III, the fearsome tsar who had reimposed autocracy and oppression on the Russian empire after the murder of Alexander II. Those who met the young tsarevich, described him as pleasant and likeable, but otherwise unremarkable – hardly the traits of a man ordained by God to rule Russia. Nicholas famously expressed reluctance about taking the throne, declaring that he “never wanted to rule”. But tradition…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The February Revolution of 1917 brought the 300-year-old Romanov dynasty to an end. I believe that the immediate cause of the February Revolution of 1917 was the collapse of the Tsarist regime under the gigantic strain of World War I. The underlying cause was the backward economic condition of the country, which made it unable to sustain the war effort against powerful, industrialized Germany. All the other contributing factors only had a slight impact, I believe that they were not as important as the Great War.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas turned to the army to restore order. When it could not, he decided to return to the capital to deal with the crisis. However, the Duma knew what had to be done. Duma members met the czar’s train as it neared the city. They told Nicholas that the only way to restore order was for him to step down as czar. He tried to abdicate, or formally give up power, in favor of his brother, Mikhail.When Mikhail refused to take the throne, Russia’s monarchy came to an end.…

    • 4038 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were a number of reformist groups from 1881. Key examples of these were groups such as the Kadets, the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks. All three of these groups had slightly different aims. But all of them wanted something in common and that was change in Russia. Therefore as we clearly see reformist parties did put a large amount of pressure on Russia and on the Tsarist government. But on the other hand there were a number of other important factors that I believe where largely involved in causing the 1905 revolution. The factors I intend to include are: The large amount of social and economic problems, the Russo- Japanese war and bloody Sunday as I believe these were also key causes of the 1905 revolutions.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicholas II was the last of the Romanov dynasty rule as the Czar of Russia. His rule began on 1st of November and finished on the 15th of 1917. During the time of Nicholas’s reign Russia saw him go from the great and powerful “little father” to a much more dishonorable and weak “bloody Nicholas”. Nicholas II was unsuccessful and the reason behind all of Russia’s many downfalls such as WW1 and the Russo-Japanese war. Bloody Sunday, The October Manifesto and the Russo-Japanese war were all events that support how unsuccessful he was as Czar and prove that he was the worst ruler of his time.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Czar Nicholas II was an autocratic ruler who relied on the army and bureaucracy to hold up his regime. He was also cut off from events by his German-born wife Alexandra…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    With many social and political changes occurring during the 1800's, the Russian Intelligentsia's view on the peasantry also saw a shift. Recent emancipations in the country saw millions of former serfs and farmers with newfound rights and statuses but also saw exposed many faults in current labor practices and corruption within the bureaucratic levels of the Russian state. The current nobility took it upon themselves to decide how they handle the new working class problems and restructuring of the social hierarchy among themselves and the peasants without putting too much harm on their own social standings. While many of the nobility held the staunch belief that peasantry was incapable of life beyond simple farming, some believed to be rational…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The revolution of 1917 was the culmination of a number of factors coming together and causing the volatile mix of reasons to come together and boil over. The people of Russia where fed up with the horrible conditions they had to put up with and decided to do something about it. Some factor I will discuss include the industrialization,…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays