Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

A Nationwide Revolution

Good Essays
1615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Nationwide Revolution
Assess the reasons for the 1905 revolution
In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.
The first reason for the revolution in 1905 was the developments in the Russian countryside and how they produced a general unhappiness among the landowners and even the peasants. A long-term social and economic cause was the continuing dissatisfaction of both these groups to the Emancipation reform of Alexander II in 1861. The Landowners did not approve of the act because it denied them the free labour they had access to before the emancipation of the serfs. They had lost their free labour and large amounts of their land. By 1905 many of the Landowners were facing large debts. Although the act did end serfdom in Russia, the peasants were still angry due to the redemption payments they were expected to pay and the poor quality of land they received. They also disliked the fact that they were still tied to the local commune, or the ‘Mir’. The peasants were left angry at their rulers and this and the fact that they feared the government would repossess the homes of those who hadn’t paid their redemption payments is why they would have ransacked and occupied the houses of their landlords during the revolution. The backwardness of the Russian agricultural system also left the peasants frustrated. The Russian strip system was a regime in which each family was given a small strip of land and, when the head of the family died it would be redistributed to another family. This was a hugely flawed system because the peasants would not treat the land well as they knew a different family would inherit it. This meant that the quality of the land being received by each new family would keep getting worse. Clandestine political groups like the populists and the liberals had previously tried to rile the peasants into a rebellion. However these attempts had appeared unsuccessful due to the peasant’s ignorance of the harshness of their own treatment. The peasants only really began to revolt when the terrorist acts, organised by the social revolutionaries, spread to the countryside soon after Bloody Sunday. Overall the general displeasure of the peasants was a hugely important component in the start of a revolution because they made up the overwhelming mass of the population. It also revealed more of Nicholas’ poor decision making because of Russia’s faulty farming system

Another, and possibly more significant, element in the birth of the 1905 revolution was the treatment of the inner city working class and the ethnic minorities. Their long term treatment caused great irritation among the working class and is what caused them to protest outside the winter palace on Bloody Sunday. As Russia began to seriously progress industrially at the end of the 19th century, it had some undesirable effects on the workforce. In 1900 there were 2.3 million labourers in Russia and they lived in terrible conditions. The average worker in Russia was working 11 hours a day and by 1904 prices were rising, partly due to the start of a war with Japan. Many factories would sometimes pay their employees in coupons which could only be used at the factory shop, where prices would be unreasonably high. Strikes were illegal at the time and factory owners refused to allow workers to be represented by any form of trade union. Any attempt to join an organisation like this would end in imprisonment or being sent to Siberia, which was almost like a prison itself. Russia was a multi-national country at the start of the 20th century and only 40% of its population were actually Russian. Many ethnic groups were discriminated against by Nicholas, an open anti-Semitic, and his government through the Russification process. Russification was a regime which pushed the idea that all things Russian were superior upon the ethnic minorities. It stated that all legal proceedings had to be spoken in Russian, it encouraged the discrimination of other nationalities and made open racism a more accepted element within society. This oppression of any religion or nationality other than Christianity or Russian left many people frustrated as they could not celebrate their own cultures and it would have added to the growing anti-Tsarist notion spreading across Russia in the late 19th and early 20th century. The dissatisfaction of the labourers was a very important factor in the start of a revolution because it was the workers who marched on Bloody Sunday to immediately spark the uprising. Also when the industrial workers marched in the cities the peasants saw this and then had the courage to rise up and increase the gravity of the revolution.
The influence of the political opposition groups like the Populists, out of which came the Socialist Revolutionaries, and the extreme Marxist views of the Socialist Democratic Party were both key factors in the initiation of a revolution. Revolutionary groups were becoming increasingly organised and the Social Revolutionaries were responsible for the assassination of Plehve Minister of the Interior in 1904. The Populists had previously attempted to reveal to the peasants how badly they were actually being treated and to convince them into joining a revolution. Although this hadn’t quite worked in the countryside political ideas had begun to influence the inner city workers as they sought social and economic justice against the factory owners and the unfair Tsarist regime. In 1903 the Socialist Democrats (SDs) split into the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks, which were led by Lenin and Martov respectively. The Bolsheviks were more revolutionary than the Mensheviks. They believed that a revolution was necessary and needed to happen soon, whereas Martov and the Mensheviks thought Russia was not yet ready for a proletarian revolution. However the political organisations could not have made the effect that they did without the support of the industrial workers. Therefore although they helped the revolution take place, they were not as critical as the involvement of the peasants and workers.
Another cause of the revolution in 1905 was an embarrassing loss in the Russo Japanese war. In 1904 Russia declared war on its far eastern neighbour, Japan. Nicholas knew that Russia needed to continue expanding in Asia due to Russia’s general decline in influence in Europe. Russia also desperately needed a port which was ice free all year and wanted to distract the population from its domestic problems. The war could not have gone worse for Nicholas II as he greatly underestimated the Japanese. After heavy defeats at sea and Manchuria Russia agreed to withdraw its troops from Asia, leaving the war with less land than when they started. Nicholas’ amateur military tactics and poorly equipped soldiers were no match for the Japanese and the war only made Nicholas’ and his military look weak in the eyes of the Russian population. This would only have created more opposition to Tsardom and make the Russian revolutionaries think that if Japan could defeat Nicholas, then maybe they could. As more resources were being diverted to the war in Asia, prices in Russia began to rise and the value of workers money fell by 20%. This aggravated the labourers and would have added to the growing sense of anger in Russia. The Russo Japanese war was an important catalyst in the initiation of a revolution because it made Nicholas look weak, but more importantly his military look vincible.
Finally and one of the most important reasons for the revolution was the events that occurred on Bloody Sunday. This was the reason that, many would argue, immediately sparked a revolution across Russia in 1905. As the 3000 peaceful protestors, who were mostly workers led by Father Georgi Gapon, stood outside the Tsar’s Winter Palace in St Petersburg a large group of inexperienced soldiers began firing upon them. Around 100 of the innocent activists were killed and many more were wounded. The sheer mercilessness of the unprovoked Russian soldiers triggered outrage across Russia. This is why it played such a crucial part in the beginning of the uprising.
I conclude that although the Political groups like the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks had begun to organise themselves, they could not have had the effect they did without the participation of the urban workers. The Russo Japanese war also played a key role in frustrating the Russian population economically and in making Tsardom look fragile and weak. The Russian peasants held the overwhelming mass of the population and therefore were significant in the start of any revolution due to their sheer manpower. Therefore overall the urban workers involvement was the critical catalyst in the start of a revolution because the peasants wouldn’t have revolted unless they saw the workers success in the cities and the political parties needed them to be recognised as real organisations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The events of “Bloody Sunday” also played a dramatic role in the collapse of Tsardom. “Bloody Sunday” which was originally meant to be a peaceful protest by disgruntled steel workers in St. Petersburg took a twisted turn of events which forever tarnished the name of Tsar Nicholas II. Angered by the poor working conditions and the on-going war with Japan, thousands marched towards the Winter Palace to plead with the Tsar for reform. As the Tsar was not present at the time, panicky soldiers gunned down workers on the streets. The mass killings of dissident civilians possibly frightened the rest of the population into silent obedience, but would not have changed the fact that…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of the Russian Revolution Alexander II, the czar of Russia let the serfs free. Alexander believed they would become a small labor force and that they would move where industrial worker were needed. They also believed that peasants would start and produce even better ways of farming. This would help Russia by the government gaining more money and using it to make factories for their needs.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia had many problems that were being blamed on serfdom like military unskillfulness, the scarcity of food around the country, over population in some areas of the country, civil and public disorder and finally a delayed industry caused by serfdom. In 1856, Alexander II declared to the nobility in Russia that the change was needed and this modification was that serfdom would end and the nobility would have to decide how.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The February revolution was a big turning point in Russian history; demolishing the Tsarist autocracy and breaking the Romanov dynasty that had ruled Russia for hundreds of years. Due to many factors, involved in the war or long standing issues before the war, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to abdicate to Grand Duke Michael, desperate to keep the rule of Russia in the Romanov family. Grand Duke Michael stated he did not want to rule, therefore ending the absolute monarchy. This essay will explore the main reason for the February revolution of 1917, questioning whether the war started the revolt among the Russian people or simply acted as a catalyst for a result of long standing issues and opinions dating back to the previous revolution of 1905.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Middle class- There was a lack of common purpose between Russia’s different social classes. They organised themselves by autumn of 1905 into soviets but spent most of the year protesting in spontaneous strikes/ marches. The peasants were too widely distributed and isolated to have a common organised leadership. Their protests were traditional peasant ones of burning manor records and rioting against redemption dues. In other words they were limited to self-interested economic motives rather than any hopes for revolutionary change in the system of government. The middle class were feeling they were unrepresented as little change occurred, and very little change affected them.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bloody Sunday was an event that brought attitudes and opinions of hate towards Nicholas II and branded him with the new nickname “bloody Nicholas” which also creates a sense of how the working class felt about their Czar. Bloody Sunday was the massacre of innocent peasants holding a peaceful petition led by father Gapon, outside the winter palace and through the streets of Russia. Peasants marched unarmed and carrying religious symbols on flags hoping that their Czar would show compassion and help his people like a Czar should. This was not the case. The Imperial Guard fired 3 shots before shooting…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russo – Japanese war can not be seen as the only factor responsible for the 1905 revolution. Bloody Sunday can be seen as another short term factor that was responsible for the 1905 revolution. January 1905 Father Gapon led a peaceful demonstration to the gates of the Tsar’s winter palace. The guards at the palace opened fire on the demonstrators under the orders of the Duma. Nearly 200 women, children and men were killed at the gates; the majority of the demonstrators were peasants. The peasants saw the Tsar as the Father of Russia, so they went to Tsar with a petition for living conditions, working conditions, pay, food etc……

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under many aspects it is arguable that the 1905 Revolution and the March 1917 Revolution in Russia were very similar. Both years found the country still struggling from a war (one bringing humiliation and the other incomprehension and outrage); both found hostility from the streets directed against perceived governmental incompetence. Yet something had changed from 1905 to 1917 for Tsarism not to be able to survive the second revolution like it did the first. The reasons are to be researched in the impact that World War 1 had on the country, the October Manifesto issued by Nicholas II on 1905, and the loyalty that the population and the Armed Forces were not willing to give the Tsar anymore.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1861 Russia was a backward state, other countries in Europe had undergone the industrial revolution but Russia was still an agricultural country with a large lower class of serfs. Alexander II made the decision to emancipate the serfs in 1861 mainly due to a fear of revolt but also as a cause of liberal pressure and in the interest of economic growth. Throughout this decision and decisions to make other reforms different political groups opposed Alexander II. In the first instance from left wing revolutionary groups who were against the autocratic state and desired a democratic state. The different revolutionary groups used different methods of proposing their beliefs,…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays