MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Sullivan FROM: SUBJECT: Wriston Manufacturing Corporation DATE: June 9‚ 2011 Wriston Manufacturing Corporation (WMC) is faced with a Detroit plant that is no longer viable because of underinvestment‚ labour issues‚ and product-process mismatch. This has lead to low sales figures‚ low return‚ and high burden rates (as calculated by the company). The issues at the Detroit plant will be reviewed and options will be presented. A recommendation to address the Detroit
Premium Net present value Manufacturing Variable cost
under-invest on machinery and tooling upgrades – based mainly on its consistently lower return on assets – have further weakened the plant’s operational efficiency‚ increased overhead costs and led to its decrepit conditions today. Our recommendation to Wriston regarding the Detroit plant is to keep it running‚ invest the required amounts each year for maintenance and new tools‚ but discontinue the Group 3 products which have ceased to be economically viable. Reasons behind our recommendation are: • Due
Premium Cost Economics Costs
for the synergistic benefits of Detroit’s products‚ and to recognize inherent manufacturing complexities‚ respectively. Issues Detroit’s production is unique when compared to other Wriston plants. Runs are typically lowvolume‚ involve significant set-up time‚ and vary significantly due to the sheer volume of different products lines‚ families and models. It is notable that the Detroit plant is the only plant manufacturing all three product lines: brakes‚ off-highway and on-highway axles; all other
Premium Net present value Manufacturing Investment
To: Richard Sullivan‚ Vice President‚ Heavy Equipment Division‚ WMC Subject: Wriston Manufacturing Corporation Date: May 1‚ 2012 Thank you for the opportunity to work with Wriston Manufacturing Corporation (WMC)‚ it has been both a rewarding and insightful experience. As requested‚ an evaluation has been conducted to assess and identify the key areas of strength and weakness and to provide an external perspective into possible opportunities for corporate advancement. Based on our analysis
Premium Investment Manufacturing Plant
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: RICHARD SULLIVAN 76220136 WRISTON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 3RD FEBRUARY‚ 2014 Overview Wriston Manufacturing Corporation (WMC)‚ a multi-billion dollar corporation with products targeted at North American transportation industry‚ had seen a decline in sales over the last three years and as a result under-performing plants of Heavy Equipment Division (HED) such as Detroit and Lima were coming under increased scrutiny on their future financial viability
Premium Photosynthesis Plant
Wriston Manufacturing We identified seven factors contributing to the variance in overhead costs from plant to plant. However‚ in order to best understand how these factors contribute to inter-plant variance‚ it is helpful to first take note of the individual components of total overhead. As noted in the case‚ fixed overhead includes depreciation‚ utilities‚ salaries‚ and fringe benefit costs of employees‚ whereas variable costs consist of first-line supervisors’ wages‚ costs of set-up labor‚ scrap
Premium Manufacturing Cost Employee benefit
Tatiana Krymsky Artem Bolshakov Alexander Rubinchik Matan Kurman Wriston Manufacturing: Redistribution vs. Factory Termination vs. New Plant Recommendation: The Detroit plant is an inefficient factory and ought to be closed as soon as possible. Products should be transferred to other plants for benefits in both operational and financial gain. Assessment of Option 1: Close the Plant (Transfer Products to Other Plants) Financial Analysis Selling the plant would cause immediate cash
Premium Net present value Investment
Wriston Corporation: The Detroit Plant Summary: Richard Sullivan‚ recently appointed vice president in the Heavy Equipment Division (HED) of the Automotive Supplier Group of the Wriston Manufacturing Corporation‚ scrutinized one more time the P&L forecast for the Detroit plant – part of the lengthy report on the future of the plant which had been prepared by a task force Sullivan had appointed six months earlier. He saw three major alternatives: close the plant as soon as possible and transfer its
Premium Idea Revenue Investment
MANUFACTORING CORPORATION Case Study Chapter 12 – Crosby Manufacturing Corporation Abstract Next to first-hand experience‚ case studies are one of the best ways to learn project management skills. In The Crosby Manufacturing Corporation case study‚ Harold Kerzner reports on the executive-level exchange between the company president and other department heads regarding a new Management Cost and Control System (Kerzner‚ 2009). This paper will give a synopsis of the case‚ analyze
Premium Project management
Case Study Crosby Manufacturing Corporation “I’ve called this meeting to resolve a major problem with our management cost and control system (MCCS)‚” remarked Wilfred Livingston‚ president. “We’re having one hell of a time trying to meet competition with our antiquated MCCS reporting procedures. Last year we were considered nonresponsive to three large government contracts because we could not adhere to the customer’s financial reporting requirements. The government has recently shown a renewed
Premium Cost Project management Computer