student comment area of A Collaboration Product and Betrayal 01‚ 04‚ and 05: 1. Date you attended the session. 2. At least 3 sentences explaining how Shakespeare’s story about Julius Caesar is different than what really (historically) happened in Caesar’s life. 3. Give examples of the three persuasive techniques from either Antony’s or Brutus’s speech. (logos‚ pathos‚ and ethos) 4. Give an example of one traitor and one patriot with supporting examples from the play. 5
Free Rhetoric Roman Republic Julius Caesar
third person was a propaganda to portray himself as a successful military commander. I think Julius Caesar was a man with ambition to become greater and to gain popular support of the people for more power in controlling the government of Rome. In the book‚ these are many of the fine qualities like: talent for commander‚ persuasive speaker both military and politically‚ and ambition for glory that Caesar had or he portrayed himself to enabled to triumph against odds that were almost always against
Premium Julius Caesar Roman Republic Augustus
much easier. Also‚ if the leader were noble to his countrymen‚ then there would not be any disputes within the country. In Julius Caesar‚ Mark Antony is a perfect example of a good leader. Not only is he a confident and noble person‚ he is also persuasive and that helps in becoming a good leader. Antony would be a good leader of Rome because he is confident‚ noble‚ and persuasive. He never changes his mind when he makes a decision and that is good in a leader. When the triumvirate was making a list
Premium Roman Republic Augustus Mark Antony
In Julius Caesar there is a point after Caesar dies that both sides speak about the current situation. They meet at the place of Caesar’s funeral. Before then Antony is told: he cannot speak badly of them‚ he cannot speak badly of Caesar‚ he had to speak in the same place‚ and he had to speak second. These limitations were set so that the public wouldn’t turn against the Conspirators. The speeches are made to show the public why it was done‚ but an underlying plot turned the public against one side
Premium Julius Caesar Roman Republic Mark Antony
throuh the utilisation of the vehicle conflicting perspectives. Also‚ the presentation of a text significantly affects the audience’s overall perception of its set of values.These concepts are illustrated in the Shakespearean play‚’Julius Caesar’. Julius Caesar was published in 1623 during the Elizabethan Renaissance period. It is centrally based on envious conspirator’s plotting against their potential king in order to gain power within the Roman society. The play encompasses many instances
Premium Writing Theatre Literature
The Degeneration of Political Morality in Julius Caesar Friends‚ Romans‚ countrymen‚ lend me your ears; I come to bury Caesar‚ not to praise him. The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be with Caesar. (Act III. Scene ii.74-78) Julius Caesar is among the best of Shakespeare’s historical and political plays. The play is
Free Roman Republic Julius Caesar Roman Empire
anything for the good of all Romans that is a similarity between Cassius and Brutus because Brutus says he would do anything to protect Rome but when Cassius outsmarts him and uses him to kill caesar‚ that is a difference. Cassius thoughts of killing Caesar are lead because he is ambitious and wants the power or more than Caesar had. He was also Envy of Ceasar and of all the respect he had from the people. "Why‚ man‚ he doth bestride the narrow world/Like a Colossus‚ and we petty men/Walk under his
Premium Julius Caesar Roman Republic Augustus
remains unknown. The deciding factor that gave the Celts a permanent place in history was Christianity. Despite the prevalence of Christianity throughout Celtic society‚ much of the art and literature was unique to their culture. Around the time Julius Caesar was taking control of Celtic lands‚ Christianity was becoming more and more of a dominant religion in the area (Lassieur 75). By the fourth century A.D.‚ many Gauls had taken advantage of
Premium
Conflicting Perspectives: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Ambitious Tyrant or “Noblest Man that Ever Lived in the Tide of Times”? An Into English Presentation Conflicting Perspectives: The Theory • All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values. • This means that every composer has a purpose‚ which is based on the issues arising from their context and audience. • To that end‚ the composer uses conflicting perspectives as a vehicle for successfully conveying
Free Roman Republic Julius Caesar Augustus
In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar‚ Cassius‚ a main character‚ discussed the integral role of humanity’s decisions‚ saying‚ "The fault...is not in our stars‚ but in ourselves" (I.ii.139-141). Within a modern context‚ Cassius’s viewpoint is secular‚ demanding that all of us‚ not fate‚ is in control of the courses of our lives. However‚ it is also countercultural as our society ingrains itself in the norm of scapegoating‚ where humanity points to individuals/groups whom we can dump our rage for
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology