1.0 INTRODUCTION TO UNEMPLOYMENT Unemployment is a situation where people have no job whether they are quitted or being fired and they are actively searching for it. There are two theories that were explained about unemployment that is Classical theory and Keynesian theory. 2.0 THEORIES THAT EXPLAIN UNEMPLOYMENT 2.1 CLASSICAL THEORY The first theory is Classical theory. It was first developed by Karl Max. From this theory it state that the level of unemployment will increase if there is government
Free Unemployment Keynesian economics
HELMER et al. v. RUMARSON TECHNOLOGIES‚ INC. (two cases) Court of Appeals of Georgia‚ 2000. 245 Ga. App. 598‚ 538 S.E.2d 504 FACTS Rumarson Technologies‚ Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24‚965 owed to it by Event Marketing‚ Inc. (EMI) when EMI’s check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI’s corporate account‚ and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower
Premium Appeal Cheque Court
Unemployment case in the Municipality Of Murcia Negros Occidental Unemployment definition The state of being involuntarily out of work. The unemployment rate is the number unemployed as a percentage of the total population of working age. An unemployment level of under 3% is thought of as a natural rate as people change their jobs‚ their residences‚ and their state of health. Structural unemployment occurs when the labour market no longer requires a particular skill‚ as in the case of printing
Premium Unemployment
to obtain regular raises and bonuses. The appellant admits that the threshold for reviewing a jury’s award is set very high‚ requiring that the verdict is so inordinately high that it must be a wholly erroneous estimate of damages. Relying on the cases of Howes v. Crosby [1984] O.J. No.3127 (C.A.) and Snushall v. Fulsang [2005] O.J. No. 4069(C.A.)‚ the appellants defined “inordinate “as too high or too low by 50%. Legal issue: Was the jury’s award for damages of $40‚000 patently excessive and
Premium Jury Law Tort
that if there is a production point beyond the PPF then‚ it is unattainable. Meaning‚ we can’t make a lot of everything due to how we allocate our resources. We could make a lot of scarves but then we’d have to give up gloves and vice versa. 3) "If Mexico is currently operating at a point beyond its production possibilities
Premium Economics Microeconomics Economics of production
S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks Serving Summit County United States Court of Appeals‚ Ninth Judicial District 499 F3d 553 (2009) MOORE‚ Presiding Judge Rule of Law: The Privacy Protection Act (PPA) and the First Amendment rights were brought into question by the Plaintiffs. The judges ruled out the violation of the First Amendment rights and focused on the Privacy Protection Act as the main claimed offense. FACTS: Steve Hindi is the founder of S.H.A.R.K‚ a non-profit corporation that exposes
Free Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
be a number of people who are unemployed. Unemployment is when there are people in our society who desire work but are unable to obtain it because of the fact that there are not enough jobs for everyone. There are many factors that can cause unemployment but one of the biggest factors is lack of private investment. This is caused by private companies not expanding their activities fast or not expanding them fast enough. Another main factor of unemployment is the increase of labour costs. Labour costs
Free Unemployment
BRIEFING A CASE EXAMPLE Student Name: Class: Case Number: PATTERSON V. McLean Credit Union 491 U.S. 164 (1989) FACTS: Patterson‚ a black female‚ worked for the McLean Credit Union as a teller and file coordinator for ten years. Patterson alleges that when she was first interviewed for her job‚ the supervisor‚ who later became the president of McLean Credit Union‚ told her that she would be working with all white women and they probably would not like working with her because she
Premium United States Race Black people
that the testator’s name be subscribed at the end of the will by some other person‚ in the testator’s presence and at his direction. In order to make a valid will‚ the testator must strictly comply with the provisions for formal execution. In this case there is no way of knowing that the decedent’s failure to sign was a mistake or not. DISPOSITION: The lower courts determination of invalidity is affirmed. COMMENTS: It is evident that the will was not signed by the decedent and in accordance
Premium Law Common law Sign
for damages that the defendant caused by not fulfilling the oral and written contracts. The defendant claims that the contracts were only binding if the script was revised to her specifications‚ and so were void when the changes were not made. 3. What was the court’s decision and reasons? The defendant claims that she gave consent to a script that followed her specifications on nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and the final script did not follow these wishes‚ so she essentially did not consent
Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement