TRIAL BY MEDIA The courts in India play vital role in the distribution of power and rights and in the overall development of the country. The independence of each individual judge ensures that every case is decided on the basis of the law‚ the evidence and facts‚ without any improper influence. Consequently‚ judicial independence is an indispensable element of the right to due process‚ the rule of law and democracy. It is axiomatic that a judge should not act on any influence of any third party
Free Judge Court Criminal law
Mock Trial was a great experience for me since it was my first time doing it in my life. My role was an officer called‚ Officer Low. Officer Low has been on the local police force for eight and a half years. I think my role was not easy because I had to memorize all my lines in order to answer the lawyer’s question. Also‚ I had to know where the offender Wally Brogue was standing and where the radio‚ beer and marijuana were on the diagram of David Benning’s and Sara Volsky’s apartment. Plus‚ I had
Premium Crime Court Argument
The witchcraft trials of Salem was a hysteria that swept through the state of Massachusetts; that would change the whole demeanor of the town. It all began when a group of girl; once friends‚ turned delinquents accused a number of women of performing the devils magic causing them to be possessed. Over the time of a year there was an overwhelming amount of accusation of witchcraft. The governor sought out to create a new court‚ calling it the "court of oyer and terminer". In this court is where
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft Massachusetts
Is it part of the concept of a fair trial that‚ if an accused cannot afford legal representation‚ the state must provide it? INTRODUCTION ‘When a person is faced with deprivation of liberty‚ the most stringiest standards must be followed to ensure that the person is properly subject to that restriction.’ The notion of obtaining a fair trial has long been questioned as far back in the time of trial of King Charles I of England in 1649. His highness insisted upon his conception of the rule of law
Premium Law Crime
Criminal Trials: Should they be Televised or not? Faith R. Warner Rasmussen College This research is being submitted on December 7‚ 2010‚ for Rose Pogatshnik’s CCJ 1000 course at Rasmussen College by Faith R. Warner. Cochran‚ B. President‚ & radio-television news directors association & f. (n.d). (2005‚ November 9). Cameras in the courtroom. pp 1-5. Retrieved October 19‚ 2010‚ from Points of view reference center database. “Ms. Bergman is President of the National
Premium Jury Court Criminal law
Introductory The subject of ‘Trial by Media’ is discussed by civil rights activists‚ Constitutional lawyers‚ judges and academics almost every day in recent times. With the coming into being of the television and cable-channels‚ the amount of publicity which any crime or suspect or accused gets in the media has reached alarming proportions. Innocents may be condemned for no reason or those who are guilty may not get a fair trial or may get a higher sentence after trial than they deserved. There appears
Premium Criminal law Human rights Law
Scopes Trial The Scopes Trial is a famous trial that had one main topic to focus on: evolution. This trial was brought on because John Scopes taught his students about evolution. The trial happened in 1925 in Tennessee. For creationists and evolutionists‚ this was a huge trial because it was the first major account of the teaching of evolution. Although this seems as a simple matter between creationists and evolutionists‚ there is more to meets the eye. The Scopes Trial was more complicated. The
Premium Evolution Creationism Scopes Trial
Were the Rosenbergs really guilty? Thomas C. Reeves once said "Numerous people felt that the Rosenbergs did not get a fair trial or that their sentence was too harsh" (Thomas Reeves). Many people believed that the Rosenbergs were innocent and the convictions against them were not enough to prove they were involved in espionage. Others believe they were guilty and their crime was rose than murder. The story of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg was very controversial. It involved the Rosenbergs participation
Premium
Trial by Media The justification system is quickly being scorched in America by how the media manages all lurid cases. People are getting prejudged by the press and public before any legal action has taken place. I believe it is completely amiss for the media to interpret whether a person is guilty or innocent‚ before or even after a verdict has been established in a court of law. Take O.J. Simpson’s case for instance. Simpson was accused of murdering his ex-wife‚ Nicole Brown Simpson. This
Premium O. J. Simpson Nicole Brown Simpson Court
Clinical Trials ‘All patients should receive the best possible therapy AND the well-being of the individual research subject must take precedence over all other interests.’ Says article 11.3 of the ‘Declaration of Helsinki’‚ the Holy Grail for biomedical research on humans. With more and more clinical trials being conducted in developing countries‚ the question naturally arises…while outsourcing these trials‚ are the pharmaceutical companies growing to disregard this declaration? To be able
Premium Informed consent Pharmacology Clinical trial