Synopsis of Spanish Spanish also known as español or castellano has become one of the most well-known and spoken languages worldwide. It one of the most well known romantic language around the globe. It derived from Latin roots making it the dominating language of the Latin continents. It is also considered the dominating language in the United Stated today. Spanish and English are similar in their phonemic inventory. Spanish is similar in the short vowels of English such as: /a/‚ /e/‚ /i/‚
Premium Spanish language Romance languages French language
Question 1 What legal issues does this situation raise and what are the possible legal consequences? Issue 1--duty of care The tort of negligence to be constituted depend on whether the defendant violate the principle of ‘Duty 0f Care’. Because of the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1]‚ ‘Duty 0f Care’ has been established in common law: 1. Defendant whether or not fulfill the duty of care. 2. That defendant whether or not breached that duty. 3. whether Breach the duty of care is the main
Premium Tort law Law Negligence
the badly injured market by the world financial crisis causing weak demand for buying property. As an operating manager assistant I experienced how people from different national cultures were likely to be motivated by different factors. In this synopsis I will strive to reveal which factors best motivate Danish and Bulgarian real-estate agents? Problem Outline (Relevance and Contribution) I choose real-estate agents since they are the one bringing a firm’s success and real-estate companies
Premium Maslow's hierarchy of needs Motivation
Synopsis Baarda Research question: The question the researcher will formulate an answer to. Applied research: answers a practical question. (clear goal is very important) Research ethics: will the respondents take part voluntarily will the obtained data be confidential and anonymous will the respondents be fully informed in advance of the research about the purpose and method? Can you ensure that the research will have no negative consequences for the respondents? Will the research
Premium Research Scientific method
CASE ONE: LAW OF TORT An accident was occurred by the car driven by Azhar with the disabled lorry which has been stalled by Ah Chan. Two of these persons have made their own fault as what happened on case Ramachandran a/l Mayandy v. Abdul Rahman bin Ambok. First of all‚ Azhar has derived his vehicle along a state road at slightly above the speed limit and his vehicle was equipped with a seatbelt but Azhar was not wearing it at the time of the collision. In addition‚ the impact of the collision
Premium Tort Common law Negligence
Issues Identified: 1. Whether William has an action in common negligence against Edmund. 2. Whether Sam has action in rescuer’s duty against Edmund 3. Whether William has an action in vicarious liability against TCS 4. Whether Sam has an action in vicarious liability against TCS Pleadings: 1. William v Edmund A. Duty of care Foreseeability – there will be accidents if bus isn’t checked properly and if Edmund doesn’t watch the road. Fair just reasonable. Proximity – safety of William depended
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
Lord Buddha Education Foundation Synopsis For Technical Presentation Entitled “E-recruitment: an emerging HRM technology” September‚ 2010 Submitted By Bikash Agrawal MBA - I …………….. Roll No. Synopsis (LBEF) Title: e-recruitment: an emerging HRM technology Objective: 1. To study the merits and demerits of e-recruitment 2. To analyze the reasons why an organization adopts e-recruitment over other modes of
Premium World Wide Web Recruitment Employment
Concurrent liability Text [13.45] – [13.65]‚ [13.80] – [13.120] Vicarious liability is the liability of an employer for a tort committed by an employee within the course of employment Stevens v Brodribb sawmilling the existence of control between an employer and employee is not enough to prove a relationship for vicarious liability. Further criteria such as obligation to work‚ hours to work etc is also considered Elazac pty ltd v Sheriff the plaintiff was not an employee but a contractor
Premium Tort law Tort
liability. In Donoghue v Stevenson‚ friends of Mrs. Donoghue bought her a bottle of ginger beer‚ which contained a composed snail and caused Mrs. Donoghue to be ill. Since Mrs. Donoghue did not buy the beer‚ she could not sue under contract law but in tort. The Court held that manufacturer owed duty of care to Mrs. Donoghue and that duty was breached. The rationales behind were that Mrs. Donoghue should have had in their mind as being influenced by their careless behavior. People owe duty of care to
Premium Tort Duty of care Tort law
4.0 INTRODUCTION Occupiers’ liability generally refers to the duty owed by land owners to those who come onto their land. However‚ the duty imposed on land owners can extend beyond simple land ownership and in some instances the landowners may transfer the duty to others‚ hence the term occupier rather than owner. The term occupier itself is misleading since physical occupation is not necessary for liability to arise. Occupiers’ liability is perhaps a distinct form of negligence in that there must
Premium Tort law Tort