2. Fin no: 3. Assignment: Cases on Contract law 4. Course: Diploma of hospitality management (Food & Beverage) 5. Intake: 35 6. Lecturer: Mr. Roland Foo Hee Wan 7. Date Of submission: 17th Jan’ 2012 Content 1. Introduction…………….……………………………………………………….….Page 3 2.Tort case …………………………………………………………………………..Page 4‚ 5 3. Contract Cases………………………………………………………………….Page 5‚ 6‚ 7 4. References…………………………………………………………………………Page
Premium Contract
HELD: Under the Corporation Code‚ Naguait is liable bec: (1) he actively managed the business; (2) there was evidence that CFTI obtained reasonably adequate insurance; and (3) there was a corporate tort in this case. Our jurisprudence is wanting to the definite scope of “corporate tort.” Essentially‚ “tort” consists in the violation of a right given or the omission of a duty imposed by law. Simply stated‚ it is a breach of legal duty. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK‚ petitioner‚ vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS
Premium Common law Tort Legal terms
make -up determine if a person is predisposed to certain diseases like diabetes‚ but the environment at which such an individual is growing up in usually‚ affects him or her more than the genetic make-up (Anastasia‚ 1958). The environment in this case involves the diet and nutrition which will improve the chances of living longer hence influencing the development of the person. Different people come from different environments and backgrounds as
Free Human nature Nature versus nurture Intelligence quotient
TORT LAW REVISION GUIDE: LLB/LLM PROGRAMME 2014 General Guidance All topics covered on the Tort module are potential examination topics. This revision guide covers only those potential examination topics deemed core areas of knowledge in tort law. All students‚ whether studying toward the LLB or LLM‚ must have full command of these core topics for any assessment in tort law. Unless these notes expressly state otherwise‚ students can expect core examination topics to appear in either essay
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
There are extracts from this case at p. 80 of Weinrib and then a summary of the result of this case at p 183. The case has some important passages beyond what appear in the p. 80 extract. Please add the following to your reading: LORD REID‚ LORD MORRIS OF BORTH-Y-GEST‚ LORD PEARCE‚ LORD WILBERFORCE‚ LORD PEARSON [Delivered by LORD REID] This is an appeal from a judgment of Walsh J. dated 10th October 1963 in the Supreme Court of New South V/ales in commercial cases by which he awarded to the respondents
Premium Tort Common law Tort law
A civil wrong other than a breach of contract. Tort usually refers to the causing of damage to property or to a person’s reputation‚ or harm to a person’s commercial interests. Wrongful act‚ other than a breach of contract‚ that injures another and for which the law permits a civil (noncriminal) action to be brought. Relief may be obtained in the form of damages or an injunction. The term derives from Latin tortum‚ meaning something twisted‚ wrung‚ or crooked The body of the law which allows
Premium Contract Tort Damages
through the brickwork of the plaintiff’s cellar. The plaintiff claimed for damages however it was held that there was no negligence because the incident was unforeseeable and so obscure that it would be monstrous to hold the defendants responsible. 4.Bolam v friern The plaintiff‚ suffering from mental illness‚ consented to electro convulsive therapy resulting in him suffering several fractures. He thereafter claimed damages against the hospital claiming that the treatment had been administered incorrectly
Premium Duty of care Tort Standard of care
Tort case scenarios Tort Case Scenarios Tort Case Scenarios The scenarios below provide several examples of torts to include negligence‚ unintentional torts‚ intentional torts‚ assault‚ battery‚ etc. Torts are civil wrongs recognized by law as grounds for a lawsuit. These wrongs result in an injury or harm constituting the basis for a claim by the injured party (Cornell‚ 2010). Scenario 1 Scenario 1 has multiple instances that happen during the game that raises attention between
Premium Tort Tort law
Task1 What kind of liability do you think Ton should bear in Scenario 1? Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability. There are three differences between liability and contractual liability: A. The difference of base. Contractual liability means that due to the breach of duty‚ contractual collateral obligation of contract or violates the "contract law" provisions of the obligations. Finding out a contractual liability has to be
Premium Tort Tort law
Case Analysis: Students are obliged to pre-prepare a two-page outline of their answers to the stated cases/problems in the given tutorial. The faculty will ask individual students to deliver an oral summary of their outline answer to the tutorial problems. These answers‚ written and oral‚ will form the basis of the tutorial proceedings. Here is a “rough guide” to the seven headings under which any case should be analyzed: 1. Case History = what was the legal basis of the claimant’s claim? When
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Logic