Skogsbergh Philosophy of The Person Professor Marren 12/12/14 Thesis Question: Is it better to live just or unjust? Unjust live better According to Socrates in The Republic of Plato‚ men can be both just and unjust in terms of who is a friend and who is an enemy‚ for all humans make mistakes‚ so each person cannot always be considered just. Thrasymachus argues‚ “In every city the same thing is just‚ the advantage of the established ruling body. It surely is master; so the man who reason rightly concludes
Premium Plato Political philosophy Ethics
types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and‚ even more importantly‚ to disobey and resist unjust laws." The speaker asserts that each individual in a society has a responsibility to disobey and resist the unjust ones. However‚ as far as I am concerned‚ such responsibility is neither jurally valid nor practically feasible and thus does not exist. People often try to modify the laws instead of passively disobeying the unjust laws. To begin
Premium Law Political philosophy Human rights
Matthew-Donald Toombs C & D Block 12-5-12 Vietnam‚ Just or Unjust? Some ask the question‚ was the Vietnam War just? Some may say yes it was just‚and others say that it is unjust. However‚Certain people view justice as slippery concept. There are always ways to get aroud justice‚ and that is why people believe that justice is a slippety concept. Even Plato one of the brightest of his time could not figure out whether war was just or unjust. A Certain individual‚ by the name of Aquinas‚ also
Premium Aristotle Natural law Thomas Aquinas
people due to the unconstitional behaviors that continued to take place there. Martin focus on 3 central themes; moral obligation over unjust laws‚ direct action and justification of
Premium Morality Ethics Civil disobedience
Carved upon a black stone eight feet high where everyone could read them‚ this Code was an improvement from previous lawless dynasties. However‚ these laws—compared to some other ancient laws such as the Mosaic Law and Roman Justinian Code—were unfair‚ unjust‚ and based on the social classes. Hammurabi’s laws were based on the harsh “eye for eye‚ tooth for tooth” mentality of the ancient era‚ requiring a death penalty for many slight offenses. For example‚ according to the twenty-first law in Hammurabi’s
Premium Mesopotamia Ancient Egypt Sumer
Cohort: USC Question: Hammurabi’s Code: Was it just? Is Hammurabi’s code Just or Unjust Introduction Paragraph Hammurabi’s was a king in Mesopotamia with laws that were used for just or unjust reasons. Hammurabi’s codes are set of laws that are written down. Hammurabi was the king of Babylon in Mesopotamia. The purpose of Hammurabi’s code was for the citizens of his city-state to follow the laws if not they deal with Hammurabi. Hammurabi’s Code was just for three reasons personal injury‚family law
Premium Law Code of Hammurabi Babylonia
Birmingham City Jail”‚ King talks about how to know the difference between just and unjust laws. He states‚ “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”(Shafer-Landau 408). King believed that unjust laws promote disharmony and that these laws essentially destroy human personality‚ while just laws uplift personality. In his opinion‚ he believed that laws were characterized as just laws if they were helping to make an individual better as a person‚ if
Premium Morality Ethics Law
Carl Albert State College The Death Penalty Just or Unjust Phil 3203 April 14‚ 2014 The Death Penalty Just or Unjust? The Death Penalty Just or Unjust The death penalty is the punishment of execution‚ administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Capital crimes may include first degree murder (premeditated)‚ murder with special circumstances (such as intentional‚ multiple‚ involved with another crime‚ with guns‚ of a police officer‚ or a repeat offense)
Premium Murder Capital punishment Prison
A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm‚ as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1‚ evaluates the conditions that constitute just war‚ and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths‚ this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”‚ and provides only a foundation
Premium Argentina Royal Navy
rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology‚ is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have‚ would be significantly different from other people‚ thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result‚ if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act‚ society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals‚ resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on‚ Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three
Premium Morality Ethics Nazi Germany