Lucille Ann Carreon‚ Joseph Valerian Timtim‚ Kimberly Loide Viernes‚ Gerald Paul Nature of Law Legal Positivism There are a lot of theorists who pioneered in the concept of Legal Positivism.But among them are two leading theorists who mainly contributed on this idea and further argued on each other’s respective opposite views. One of which is John Austin‚ who holds that legal positivism is the nature of law which deals with the existence and contents of law based on social facts and not on
Premium Jurisprudence Law
Positivism refers to a set of epistemological perspectives and philosophies of science which hold that the scientific method is the best approach to uncovering the processes by which both physical and human events occur. Though the positivist approach has been a ’recurrent theme in the history of western thought from the Ancient Greeks to the present day’ [1] the concept was developed in the early 19th century by the philosopher and founding sociologist‚ Auguste Comte. | Positivism was a method
Premium Sociology Positivism Scientific method
actually the law‚ and the fact that it is unjust‚ unwise‚ inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism‚ law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered‚ decided‚ practiced‚ tolerated‚ etc.); as we might say in a more modern idiom‚ positivism is the view that law is a social construction."[2] Legal positivism was focusing on how to prevent possible conflict between concurrent rule(s) and successive norm(s)‚ or foundation of law(s) in reality so that
Free Law
Positivism emerged towards the end of the nineteenth century‚ and sought to oppose traditional‚ Classical ways of criminological thinking. The theory tended to look at crime scientifically‚ in order to produce facts based around the key causes of crime and so‚ they could attempt to truly understand what kind of people offend and for what reasons. Offenders and offending behaviour had been understood before as voluntary concepts‚ where people had free will and the choice to commit crime (or not to)
Premium Criminology Sociology Crime
This essay shall begin by defining what positivism is‚ and how it could be used to approach the study of poverty and what problems there might be with this quantitative method. It will then move on to discuss phenomenology‚ a qualitative method‚ to come to a conclusion on which method (if any) is more useful than the other. The basic philosophy of positivism is that our social world is similar to the natural world in that both are governed by particular ‘laws’; for example‚ just as ‘cause and effect’
Premium Sociology Psychology Quantitative research
Exploring Research Methodologies: Positivism and Interpretivism Before a researcher can initiate a research project‚ they face the confusion and the range of theoretical perspectives‚ methodologies‚ methods‚ and the philosophical basis that encompasses them all. This seemingly meticulous structure for the research process is in fact aimed toward providing the researcher with a scaffolding’‚ or a direction which they can go on to develop themselves to coincide with their particular research purposes
Premium Scientific method Quantitative research Sociology
Positivism‚ (also referred to as ‘empiricism’) is often used to indicate that this approach to understanding criminality is scientific. The term ’positivism ’ (or in its more sophisticated form "Logical Positivism") is often used to refer to an approach that asserts it utilizes science or the scientific method (their version of science) to understand the causes of criminality and thus the solutions to solving it. Positivism is an epistemological position or a theory of knowledge which assets that
Premium Scientific method Science Empiricism
edu/ssss/QR/QR10-4/krauss.pdf Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer Steven Eric Krauss Universiti Putra‚ Selangor‚ D.E.‚ Malaysia An introduction and explanation of the epistemological differences of quantitative and qualitative research paradigms is first provided‚ followed by an overview of the realist philosophical paradigm‚ which attempts to accommodate the two. From this foundational discussion‚ the paper then introduces the concept of meaning making in research methods and looks at how
Premium Qualitative research Quantitative research Scientific method
Discussion for the research paradigm Input: Having the information that collagen was abundant protein in vertebrates people are used to extract collagen from mammals. But due to negative effects of collagen from mammals‚ fish skin serves as another option because it also contains collagen. It is much safer for it’s being said that marine collagen are not associated with the risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreaks which is common in pig‚ cow or any mammals’ skins and bones. In
Premium Protein Amino acid Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
example follows a pattern: one desires something‚ finds it unattainable‚ and reduces one’s dissonance by criticizing it. Jon Elster calls this pattern "adaptive preference formation. Theory and research Most of the research on cognitive dissonance takes the form of one of four major paradigms. Important research generated by the theory has been concerned with the consequences of
Premium Cognitive dissonance