Right To Privacy Under Article 21 and the Related Conflicts A very fascinating development in the Indian Constitutional jurisprudence is the extended dimension given to Article 21 by the Supreme Court in post-Maneka era. The Supreme Court has asserted that Art. 21 is the heart of the Fundamental Rights. Article 21 has proved to be multi-dimensional. The extension in the dimensions of Art.21 has been made possible by giving a extended meaning to the word ‘life’ and ‘liberty’ in Article 21. These
Premium Privacy Human rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Criminal Law You have the right to remain silent‚ anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to an attorney‚ if you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided for you. These famous words came from Miranda vs. Arizona‚ a Supreme Court case that took place March 13‚ 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested by the Phoenix Police Department‚ who failed to advise him of his rights to an attorney and his rights to remain silent. This case has given alleged
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Law Police
The year 1966 was a turning point for rights of United States citizens because of the Supreme Court case‚ Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda was arrested for rape and kidnapping of a woman. Following his arrest‚ he was convicted based on his confession of the crime. Nevertheless‚ the Supreme Court ruled that his rights were violated according to the Fifth Amendment‚ which lead to his release. Reynolds Lancaster and Gina Jones were two authors that pointed importance of rights and issues related to the case
Premium Crime Police Law
Privacy – Such a Lonely Word Examining the Implications of User Privacy to Corporate Management Privacy – Such a Lonely Word Examining the Implications of User Privacy to Corporate Management The concept of privacy has moved more and more toward the forefront of people’s minds since the attacks of September 11th‚ on the World Trade Center in New York. Privacy is not necessarily about ‘hiding something’ but it is more of a ‘liberty’ that many would argue is under attack by the government (Schneier
Premium Privacy Privacy law Law
HSM-240 CheckPoint: Court Decisions Judge stalls Mich. drug testing program for welfare applicants. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly‚ 10421394‚ 11/22/99‚ Vol. 11‚ Issue 45 I chose this one because of personal experience in the state of Virginia where I live‚ before EBT cards that we use now to buy food with before we got food stamps and the where half the value on the street where you could get cash or drugs. Almost all the public housing residents also received food stamps and you believe
Premium Drug addiction Drug United States
sabotage our defenses. (2 points) Score 3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation? Answer: When our shores are in danger‚ or threatened by hostile forces we must do what is necessary to protect them. (2 points) Score 4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities? Answer: The Supreme Court (2 points) Score 5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States
What do you feel is the top three considerations for the safety of your students and their work? Describe your plans for safe guarding these areas? My three most important considerations for the safety of my students and their work are: 1. Review any artifacts I am planning to use in my eportfolio and look for any information that might impinge on my students’ safety in any way. I will ask myself questions ‚ such as: A. Will publishing this information help someone identify and/or find any
Premium Web search engine Google search Bing
advantages and its disadvantages as a citizen of the United States. In this case‚ Supreme Court Judges had to make a decision over the whole controversial topic of freedom of religion. The opinion of the court was written by Justice Alito in which tells the scenario of what happened to Gregory Holt‚ which starts off with him as an inmate and having the religion as being a Muslim. But the Arkansas
Premium Supreme Court of the United States
As a result the Supreme Court ruled that it made it illegal for judicial enforcement of racial separation. In particular they felt like it violated the 14th amendment which was put in place for the prevention of racial segregation. Also‚ Colored people were considered citizens
Premium African American Black people American Civil War
The decisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today’s Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison‚ in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland‚ in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward‚ Gibbons v. Ogden‚ in which Marshall defined
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution