Preview

Major Supreme Court Cases Under Judge John Marshall

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Major Supreme Court Cases Under Judge John Marshall
The decisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today's Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined national power over interstate commerce, and Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia. "John Marshall was the fourth chief justice of the United States, he was known as Great Chief Justice. He established the modern status of the Supreme Court. He served in the Revolutionary War, studied law, and was elected to the Virginia legislature in 1782. A staunch Federalist, Marshall supported acceptance of the Constitution. He declined ministerial posts but became one of the United States negotiators who resolved the XYZ Affair. Elected to Congress in 1799, he was made secretary of state by President John Adams. In 1801 he became Chief Justice. Marshall labored to increase the then-scant power and prestige of the Supreme Courts" (Harkavy, 680). One of Chief Justice John Marshall's first decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison. "Near the end of President Adams first administration Congress authorized the President to appoint justices of the peace for the District of Columbia. This was the occasion of the midnight appointments and the failure of Adam's Secretary of State to deliver commissions of appointment. A new administration took office and Secretary of State Madison, directed by President Jefferson, refused delivery. Thereupon Marbury, one of the midnight appointees, went to the Supreme Court requesting a judicial order, writ of mandamus, to compel Madison to deliver his commission. Article III. Section 2, of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction


Bibliography: Harkavy, Michael D., "Marshall, John." The New Webster 's International Encyclopedia, 1996, 680. Great American Trials, 1994, 88-90. Kutler, Stanley L., "Gibbons v. Ogden." World Book, 1992, 8, 185. Kutler, Stanley L., "Marbury v. Madison." World Book, 1992, 13, 193. Kutler, Stanley L., "McCulloch v. Maryland." World Book, 1992, 13, 335. Mendelson, Wallace. "Dartmouth College v. Woodward." The Constitution and the Supreme Court, 1965, 2nd Edition, 242-245. Mendelson, Wallace. "Gibbons v. Ogden." The Constitution and the Supreme Court, 1965, 2nd Edition, 85-91. Mendelson, Wallace. "Marbury v. Madison." The Constitution and the Supreme Court, 1965, 2nd Edition, 5-9. Mendelson, Wallace. "McCulloch v. Maryland." The Constitution and the Supreme Court, 1965, 2nd Edition, "U.S. Law." The Volume Library 1, 1997, 11, 883. William, Jerre S., "Dartmouth College Case." World Book, 1992, 5, 38. Williams, Owen G., "Marshall, John." World Book, 1992, 13, 229-230.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801, John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803), Fletcher v. Peck (1809), and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) laid the foundation for what we know today as a powerful judicial branch.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marshall’s ruling for Marbury v Madison was one of the most controversial decisions to ever be handed down from the Supreme Court. The landmark decision ultimately made the Judicial branch the most powerful branch because of the judicial review. With judicial review the Supreme Court has the ability to interpret the Constitution or any law any way that the court sees fit accordance to the law. Marshall’s ruling was clear and concise. Marbury did have the right to his appoint under law. Marbury had the right to seek a remedy because he deemed himself injured but the Supreme Court could not issue the writ because it was not of original jurisdiction. If Marbury was to have went through a lower level court, the court would have issued the writ and taken his appointment as the chief justice of…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nfib vs. Sebelius

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. Madison, he says, “if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty” (317). Judicial review for Marshall was to balance the powers of the branches of government and to establish…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH DBQ JOHN MARSHALL

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Marshall the chief justice under the legislative branch of the united states ruled over…

    • 725 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 12 Study Guide

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    John Marshall (September 24, 1755 – July 6, 1835) was an American jurist and statesman who shaped American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court a center of power. Marshall was Chief Justice of the United States, serving from January 31, 1801, until his death in 1835.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thurgood Marshall is one of the most well known people in the history of civil rights in United states and the first African American male Supreme Court Justices. He served for 24 years then retired in 1991 due to advancing years and bad health. He died later in 1993 at the age of 85. He also served as the legal director for the NAACP in the years of 1940 through 1961, a pivotal time for the organization, as changing the policy of racial segregation was one of its goals.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The biggest Constitutional issue with Marbury v. Madison is that it validated Article III of the Constitution which granted the Supreme Court the highest level of judicial power in the United States, and outlined which types of cases were parts of the Court's appellate jurisdiction, and which were parts of its original jurisdiction (Mountjoy 24). There were six Justices for the case and these were Samuel Chase, William Cushing, John Marshall, William Paterson, and Bushrod…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison is viewed as the most important case in the U.S. Supreme Court history. The important constitutional principle that was established by U.S. Supreme Court, was to use the idea of “Judicial Review”, which is the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution. Under Justice Marshall, the court began its ascent as equal in power to the congress and president. Jefferson as the new president, did not want appointees from the opposing party taking the new appointments in office. Therefore, he told James Madison not to deliver the commissions to seventeen of the appointees which were appointed by outgoing President Adams. One of the appointees was William Marbury, who did not receive his commission…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the supreme court had announced for the first time the concept that a court has the right to declare an act of congress void if it is inconsistent with the constitution. In addition William Marbury was an intended recipient of an appointment as a justice of the peace in the area of Columbia. Then when James Madison, Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state, he refused to deliver Marbury’s commission. Marbury and 3 others joined and petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling delivery of the…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Its is emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial department, to say what the law is.” (Ducat, Craig Constitutional Interpretation p. 10) These seventeen words written two hundred years ago made the highest court in the United States supreme, and making it so, Chief Justice John Marshall’s words in that sentence continue to make an impact on every Supreme Court case thereafter. Justice Marshall laid the basic foundations to protect the Federal system that was established by the Constitution. In Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden the Supreme Court maintained the United States as a federal state.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this decision, Marshall is left with a very important question “. . . whether Marbury had a remedy for the deprivation of the right [commission]” (249). The Judiciary Act of 1789 allowed the use of writs of mandamus. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court was limited and was not given on the cases of a mandamus. The only way the Supreme Court could use a mandamus was if the Congress gave them power where the constitution did not; or if “the action for mandamus in the Supreme Court was not in the commencement of an original proceeding but a form of appeal from the official against whom the writ was being sought”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Analysis

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After viewing the film in class, it showed the power of John Marshall. He changed all that was known and stayed with the organization for over 30 years. The film showed Marshall as a powerful man who brought the court system together and created a brotherhood between the judges by living together and wearing all black to emphasize prestige as they are now the interpreters of the Constitution of the United States. Marshall used his power as the Supreme Court Chief Justice to make changes in the United States that he wanted, in which were conflicting with his second cousin, President Thomas Jefferson’s opinion. It was very interesting to learn how Marshall was selected as Chief Justice by John Adams so that Thomas Jefferson would not be able to have a pick for one when he becomes president. Ironically enough, it was Marshall who swore Jefferson in to become the new president. Marshall had taken upon many cases besides Marbury verse Madison in his time as the Chief Justice, in which the movie also portrayed such as Fletcher verse Peck, McCullough verse Maryland, and Dred Scott verse…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madision

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the Marbury v. Madison case, Marshall’s powerful opinion was based on three propositions. One, the Constitution is by it’s own terms, the supreme law of the land. Two, all the legislative acts and other actions of government are subordinate to the supreme law and cannot be allowed to conflict with it. Three, the judges are sworn to enforce the provisions of the Constitution, and therefore must refuse to enforce any government action they find to be in conflict with it. In this decision Chief Justice Marshall claimed for the Supreme Court the right to declare acts of…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cst Us History Review

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Key decisions of the Supreme Court under the leadership of John Marshall solidified the power of the Supreme Court to?…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays