BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD DIPLOMA IN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DBMD21176B BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT GROUP MEMBERS NO NAME FIN NUMBER PM 1. SHIVRAJ PATEL G1099448P 2. DINESH JAGWANI G1096070W 3. ANDREY SAPUTROSUGO G1100087N DATE: ANALYSIS /40 RESEARCH /30 ORGANIZATION /15 PRESENTATION /15 NAME OF LECTURER: Mr. DANIEL THEYAGU BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT CONTRIBUTION TO THE CLASS ASSIGNMENT MADE BY
Premium Corporation Types of business entity Common law
Everyday people around the nation are brought to trial. The litigants may or may not have sufficient resources‚ but are still entitled to a fair trial under the Sixth Amendment. Clarence Earl Gideon was accused of felony by the state of Florida and did not have the money for attorney representation. Instead‚ Gideon had to approach the Florida court system blinded by the rules of litigation and unaware of the processes of making an argument. He was helpless and could not win the battle‚ eventually
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Gideon v. Wainwright Law
At present‚ cannabis is classified‚ under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971‚ as a Class B drug. That is‚ those caught dealing‚ producing or trafficking the drug could face up to 14 years in prison‚ an unlimited fine‚ or both. The maximum penalty for unauthorized possession is 5 years in prison. Should cannabis be legalised? This is debated everyday amongst Government officials‚ medical experts and even users of the still illegal narcotic. Whether it should or shouldn’t be legalised is a very controversial
Premium Common law Law United Kingdom
In the case of the reimagined ending of the film and book ‘Life of Pi’‚ in the setting of the judges from ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’‚ by Lon L. Fuller‚ 62 Harvard Law Review 616‚ I feel that the defendant‚ Pi Patel is not guilty of the act of murder. The assignment‚ as was given‚ recounts the alternative story given by Pi to the Japanese insurance authorities when questioned about his survival. Although his story with the animals is what is supposed to be real‚ one can also view it as
Premium Law Common law Harvard Law Review
Precedence which is defined as a document that would be used in determining a different case or your own case. A case that was used as a precedent in Duane Bucks case Buck v. Davis was one of his previous cases named Buck v. State. This precedence was used as a reference of the present case Buck is involved in because of the importance of a few different amendment rights. For example‚ the
Premium Law United States Constitution Jury
Before the Philippines were even considered being annexed there were some debate on whether or not to annex them. The people that were for annexing the islands argued that there were business interests in thoughts of new markets and fields of investments‚ the United States wanted to become an empire and so they wanted to expand more. USA‚ especially‚ didn’t want to lose these islands to Japan or Germany.But some people did argue against annexing the islands. One of the biggest things that stood out
Free United States Philippines
moot. The Court ruled in favor of New Jersey‚ by a margin of 6-3. In the early 1990s this case was used a number of times in the Supreme Court to allow metal detectors and other protective searches in schools. Also‚ this case was used as a precedent for Bethel School District vs. Fraser in
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
PROFESSOR SUBMITTED BY: HEMANSHI ANDLEY CLASS: 8TH SEMESTER ROLL NO: 1689 PREFACE This assignment throws glimpse on the important aspect of the Equity and trust-‘CONCEPT OF EQUITY’. The law relating to equity is largely built on precedent. The rules have been built upon by previous situations which they have dealt with. Equity" may generally be defined as the correction of a defect or error in the law. This idea is apparently of ancient origin‚ tracing back at least as far as Aristotle
Premium Common law
Criminal Code. I agree with the decision to acquit the accused‚ as the Crown failed to prove the mens rea beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision to acquit is correct because firstly‚ the highest court in Canada‚ the Supreme Court‚ which also creates precedents and case laws at the top-level decided to acquit her. Secondly‚ there was a minority opinion amongst the judges which
Premium Criminal law Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
used to contract to good conscience. In those situations equity will often step in and grant relief to the party whose disadvantage has been used to the advantage of another or whose trust has been breached. In the medieval period‚ the doctrine of precedent required the common law proceeding were commenced by the writ‚ that was only available in specified caused of his or her action within those categories‚ the common law court could not deal with it.
Premium Common law