Both Nietzsche and Lewis find problems with Agape love with accordance to their own respective philosophies of love. Lewis describes a paradoxical relation between God’s love and natural loves. Whereas Nietzsche explicates that the grounds that a person’s behavior may present itself as Agape love‚ is actually a behavior motivated primarily for selfish reason of gaining power. When comparing these two problems with Agape love‚ Nietzsche’s explanation is stronger in explaining the pattern of Agape
Premium Love
German philosopher‚ Frederick Nietzsche‚ viewed equality as being “rooted” in a “slave morality” (Grigsby‚ 2012‚ p. 84). His view was not based upon God-given rights but on a more natural order such as Charles Darwin’s survival of the fittest. Nietzsche believed that Christianity withheld a structure for slave morality within Europe. His beliefs did not identify with equality‚ compassion‚ pity‚ and selflessness in the sense that Christian-based morals do. Instead‚ Nietzsche believed that superior people
Premium Democracy Friedrich Nietzsche Monarchy
however‚ is that history as we know it has changed and people have been lead astray from their instinctual judgments as a species. Through vigorous questioning and re-questioning of his own thoughts in addition to much of history as we know it‚ Nietzsche has built his own foundation of an entirely different world for which people to live in; a better world in which the world revolves around each individual who is able to think by a Master Morality. Once one is able to grasp the idea of this Master
Premium Friedrich Nietzsche Ressentiment Michel Foucault
A central idea in the philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche is the idea of the master-slave morality. The master morality‚ the morality of the nobility‚ covers courage and strong will. In this mindset‚ one only interprets morality‚ classical virtues‚ the good and bad‚ but not the evil. Conversely‚ the slave morality accepts humility and the herd mentality‚ viewing morals as good and evil‚ vilifying the master. In his works‚ Nietzsche argues that the fatal issue with society today is the prevailing
Premium Friedrich Nietzsche Religion Ressentiment
I associate part with the motivation behind why Nietzsche was so angry with Socrates may have been from a specific sentiment family relationship. In the event that Socrates was as he has been depicted‚ then he would have been an extremely shrewd individual‚ and prevalent regardless of being a dissident. These are qualities I think Nietzsche would have preferred. In any case‚ the bearing Socrates took these things were so in opposition to Nietzsche’s own perspectives‚ that perhaps it might be said
Premium Plato Philosophy Aristotle
family by himself represents the essence of his tragic condition. Driven through this spirit to want to provide the best for his family‚ Behrani does not realize the cost of his dream. This paper will discuss the ideas of Aristotle‚ Hegel‚ and Nietzsche while examining The House of Sand and Fog. In The House of Sand and Fog‚ Behrani’s flaw is that he has set his expectations on what will be for his family too high and does not know where or how to configure these dreams to help his family. Behrani
Premium English-language films Fiction Character
n this respect‚ according to Nietzsche the value of a certain morality is to be determined in the light of the question “does it further life or does it stultify life?” . Accordingly‚ we find in The Genealogy of Morals that ‘[…] all events in the organic world are a subduing‚ a becoming master‚ and all subduing and becoming master involves a fresh interpretation‚ an adaptation through which any previous “meaning” and “purpose” are necessarily obscured or even obliterated’ (GM 12). Insofar as our
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
Ashar Hussain Friedrich Nietzsche Was One Trill Dude There are‚ perhaps‚ no religious criticisms more vitriolic than Friedrich Nietzsche’s. The world has yet to see a philosopher more staunchly opposed to traditional morality or contemporary society. It is peculiar that the son of a minister‚ born in a rural village southwest of Leipzig‚ would develop into one of the most creative‚ agile minds in the history of philosophy. Indeed‚ the realm of Nietzsche’s reasoning was as expansive as any before
Premium Friedrich Nietzsche Immanuel Kant Philosophy
and bad. He elaborates that in the modern world the way we define good and bad is never questioned since we assume those definitions were reasonably created. Over time‚ Nietzsche argues‚ we lost sight of the origin of these words‚ pinpointing this moment as “when aristocratic value judgments declined” (Nietzsche 26). Nietzsche holds the ruling aristocratic class responsible for originally defining good and bad‚ while the common lower class followed with their own definition of good and its antithesis
Premium
1 Thoughts on Equality and society; Plato‚ Rousseau‚ and Nietzsche. Equality is the concept of everyone being equal in a certain state‚ with equality there would be little to no biased opinions‚ no fighting over wealth‚ and just a free world where everyone can live amongst one another and still obey the laws without worrying about social structure or who is better than someone else. Many different philosophers have spent years on trying to figure out where inequality first started and what
Premium Plato Political philosophy