Preview

Friedrich Nietzsche: Another Perspective on Reality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Friedrich Nietzsche: Another Perspective on Reality
Friedrich Nietzsche’s on the Genealogy of Morality manages to capture what we could consider new and better human ideals, and transforms it into a reality that is not so farfetched. His problem, however, is that history as we know it has changed and people have been lead astray from their instinctual judgments as a species. Through vigorous questioning and re-questioning of his own thoughts in addition to much of history as we know it, Nietzsche has built his own foundation of an entirely different world for which people to live in; a better world in which the world revolves around each individual who is able to think by a Master Morality. Once one is able to grasp the idea of this Master Morality, they will understand that the ideals of what is good and what is bad should not actually exist, as they are not means to anything and there is no justification in labeling things as such. This along with other concepts challenges us as humans to rethink everything we have labeled as morals, and it confronts our developed tendencies to justify and question the actions of ourselves and others – arguing that there should not have to be justification or reason for anything, because it means nothing in the big picture. All that does matter is the “doing” or the “deed” itself, because there is no “good” or “bad” in and of itself. Nietzsche makes some very complex arguments that can be simplified only in pieces. One very important truth that he makes note of in his first treatise reflects on “the good” themselves (Nietzsche, 10). Those who are good are “higher minded” and thus are able to make more sense in their reasoning to do. It is this “pathos of distance” or “pathos of nobility” that helps separate those who have a “Master Morality” with those who follow a more “common and low minded” “Slave Morality.” Keeping these concepts in mind help us to realize that to follow a Master Morality requires one to have complete trust in the truth of their instinct. If this


Cited: McTaggart, Lynne. The Intention Experiment. New York: Free P, 2007. Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Genealogy of Morality. Indianapolis: Hackett Company, Inc, 1998.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical philosophers of the nineteenth century were less sure that general moral qualities could be maintained. For Marx morality and morals were a piece of middle class philosophy: sets of thoughts that overlooked the exploitative monetary courses of action of society and added to False Consciousness. Nietzsche took a gander at the starting points of morality, and like Marx, saw moral frameworks as emerging from the hobbies of social gatherings. For Nietzsche the individual needed to go past acknowledged morality to make another morality for him. In the twentieth century, there has been developing negativity about the likelihood of a widespread moral framework. Jean-Paul Sartre accentuated the subjective judgments that an individual must make so as to be genuine.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No serious thinker has done more unintentional harm to the Jewish people than Friedrich Nietzsche. Following his death, Nietzsche’s writings served as an inspiration and philosophical justification for Adolf Hitler and Nazism. Quite paradoxically, Nietzsche was far from anti-Semitic; in fact, many considered Nietzsche to be one of the more pro-Jewish philosophers of his era. Although Nietzsche’s position against anti-Semitism seems clear in the second and the third essay of The Genealogy of Morals, it is possible to misconstrue comments within the first essay as anti-Semitic. Yet considering the totality of Nietzsche’s writing in his The Genealogy of Morals, the Nazis wrongly regarded…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To understand Nietzsche’s version of the origin of guilt, some background information is necessary. In The Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche introduces the reader to two different types of morality; the slave morality and the Noble morality. These two types of morality are at odds with each other, the slave morality develops specifically as a result of the critique of the master morality.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Lightning

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When describing the lightning and the flash, Nietzsche is alluding to the human tendency to disassociate two things that are related. This may be because lightning is the descriptor and the flash is the action, which leads humans to separate the two. Nietzsche describes this mental process as “taking the latter for an action… separates. strength from expression of strength.” The lightning and the flash is related to the lambs and the birds of prey because it is impossible to separate, and blame, the birds of prey from their strength: their tendencies to kill. It would be as equally impossible to separate and blame the lambs for their weakness as their weakness functions as a way to protect themselves. The lambs do not understand this and thus…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christianity as antiquity.-- When we hear the ancient bells growling on a Sunday morning we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! This, for a jew, crucified two thousand years ago, who said he was God's son? The proof of such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and the fact that the claim is believed - whereas one is otherwise so strict in examining pretensions - is perhaps the most ancient piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts, but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function and ignominy of the cross -- how ghoulishly all this touches us, as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such things are still believed?…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophers and theologists have contemplated morality and its role in the lives of men for centuries. It is hard to define what constitutes a moral life and an amoral life when the very definition of those words are subjective; being moral is often compared to being virtuous or simply “good”. Often what is called moral is what mimics societal standards. This is an issue that has been tackled in a plethora of ways, from the establishment of religion all the way to the bed-time stories repeated to us as children. Defining morality is difficult to do because of the vast range of human action and thought, which also makes it very difficult to decide if people can truly change or develop a new moral code. Stories and tales are often used to describe…

    • 2022 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it in an absolute way, “this is a good essay” or in a relative way, “compared to the previous one, this essay is good”. Or in a utilitarian way, “this essay will get a good result” However none of these uses or descriptions actually tell us what the word good means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crimes and Misdemeanors

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the final scene when Louis Levy speaks of the capacity of love I feel he is saying that we as humans have this natural need for an emotional attachment in order to feel complete as a person. Everyone on this earth is looking for love and acceptance and this starts from birth. A baby requires love, attention, physical touch and maternal nurturing along with biological needs in order to survive. This is carried on throughout out a person’s life. If one can look back as far as possible into their childhood they will come to find that love from another being is essential to growth because this will be the basis of what kind of adult you will grow up to be, you seek acceptance from anyone, be it your mother, father, siblings or friends and even a pet, and to be important and needed and loved is vital for a person to have a sense of self-worth. If there is anything lacking in these personal requirements, then a person will most likely grow up insecure about oneself and question what their purpose in life is if they cannot have ever lasting love.…

    • 1787 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, Nietzsche introduces the concepts of Master and Slave Morality and with them, the problem of the Ascetic Ideal. Master morality is, in short, a morality of strength, individualism, and nobility that weighs actions on their consequences. Slave morality, on the other hand, values humility, sympathy, and kindness. It values actions based on whether their intent was one of “good” or “evil.” He links Slave morality to the moral codes of Christianity and emphasises that morality of “good” or “evil” is ultimately harmful. However, in modern times, Nietzsche believes that everyone experiences the struggle between Master and Slave morality.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays