1. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It’s also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS
Premium Police Crime Law
Arizona v. Gant PALS480-Capstone June 20‚ 2012 The Parties • Plaintiff – State of Arizona • Defendant – Rodney Gant • Appellant – State of Arizona • Respondent – Rodney Gant Procedural History • Respondent‚ Rodney Gant‚ was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Subsequent to the search of the Gant’s vehicle officers found cocaine in the back seat. At trial Gant moved to have the evidence suppressed denied that there was probable cause to search the vehicle‚ but did
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Arizona v. Hicks Citation: 480 U.S. 321 (1987) Facts: A bullet was shot through the floor of Hick’s apartment‚ injuring the man in the apartment downstairs. During an investigation of Hick’s apartment‚ a police found 3 guns as well as a mask. The officer also noticed a stereo system that looked out of place. The officer moved the stereo to see the serial number on it‚ and then called it into the police station. The dispatcher informed the officer that the stereo equipment had been stolen during
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Mincey v Arizona 437 US 385 (1978) Court History The Appellant was charged with possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia. The defendant was convicted in an Iowa District Court; the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts decision. The United States Supreme Court granted cert. Facts During a narcotics raid on petitioner’s apartment by an undercover police officer and several plainclothes policemen‚ the undercover officer was shot and killed‚ and petitioner was wounded‚ as were two
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Arizona v. Rodney Joseph Gant 1. Heading a. Arizona v. R. Joseph Gant‚ Supreme Court of the United States‚ 2009 (April 21‚ 2009) 2. Statement of Facts a. Tucson‚ Arizona police officers acted on an anonymous tip that the residence at 2524 N. Walnut Ave was being used to sell drugs. The door was answered by Rodney Gant‚ who after a records check‚ revealed that Gant’s driver’s license had been suspended and there was an outstanding warrant out for his arrest for driving with a suspended license
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Clerical error exception is a result of information that was incorrectly entered into a computer by a court employee. A case best known for a clerical error is Arizona v. Evans. In the court case Arizona v. Evans‚ a police officer initiated a vehicle stop which led to an arrest and the discovery of marijuana. When the officer had ran Evans in the database to ensure the driver was licensed and didn’t have any outstanding warrants‚ the database showed the Evans had a warrant. It was later discovered
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
The Miranda rights are deeper than words recited by police officers or a speech used in crime shows like Law and order to make it more realistic. They are a measure taken by the ever evolving american judicial system to protect its citizens. Paramount to any good judicial system is practice‚ routine and uniformity. This measure just aids in that pursuit of protecting individual freedoms and strengthening not only the judicial system itself but the people it was created to protect. The Miranda right
Premium Firearm Gun politics in the United States United States Constitution
Title: Miranda Warning Name: Peta-Gaye Walker Virginia Collage Time spent: 2 days Abstract Researching previous cases on a Miranda warning is one of the best ways to garner information as to the ways and procedures in how an officer goes about giving this warning. The main cases that will layout the foundation of
Premium Arrest Criminal law Crime
it must be immediately apparent that the evidence is subject to seizure. Any object falling under plain view of a police officer and who has a right to be in a position to have that view of the item it can be seized and introduce as evidence (Harris v. United States‚ 390 U.S. 234 [1968]). The scenario states that during routine patrol two police officers witnessed a man running and swinging a purse in his right hand. A woman was running and yelling behind this man to stop and return the purse back
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Searches and seizures
Cloning Miranda Author The author of this book is Carol Matas. She has written over 40 books for adults and children. Her books are either historical fiction‚ contemporary‚ fantasy or science fiction. Carol Matas writes books to entertain and to challenge her readers. Challenge them by posting ethical and moral problems in her books. She wants to make them think for themselves. This book confirms those motives clearly. Settings The Story plays in California. It’s more in the modern time. Actually
Premium United States bankruptcy law Bankruptcy in the United States Cloning