JONES VS HALL Legal Environment of Business Team G: Pablo Angell Amanda Hardin Brandon Weber BUSI 3303.03 Professor Leslie E. Lenn‚ JD TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. Executive Summary 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Statement of the Problem Summary of the Issues Analysis and Solutions Recommended Action 1. Type of case: The type of cases leading up to this case are‚ in order of subject‚ Recording Communications Without Permission‚ Resisting Arrest‚ Violation/ Deprivation of Civil
Premium Law Appeal United States
Andres Lao vs. CA‚ the Associated Anglo-Amedican Tabacco Corp. and Esteban Co. February 17‚ 2000 Corporate Officers not personally liable for Authorized Corporate Acts Facts: In 1965 a Contract of Sales Agent was entered by the Association of Anglo-American Tobacco Corporation with Andres Lao. Lao was to sell cigarettes manufactured and shipped by the Corporation to his address in Tacloban‚ and he would remit the sales proceeds. Lao would receive commission for those sold‚ with a monthly
Premium Legal terms Tort Corporation
provoking readers”[1] This version of bullying has actually gone unnoticed by mass media and law enforcements for years‚ with victims usually having to suffer on their own. However‚ in 2011‚ the first person was sentenced for trolling under the malicious communications act [2] Sean Duffy‚ the accused‚ had actually started his trolling attacks in 2010 and was involved in 4 different cases.[3] One of his attacks involved making a YouTube video ‘Tasha the Tank Engine’ with the face of Tasha‚ who
Premium Twitter Freedom of speech
interests was‚ however‚ malicious. For example‚ Social Darwinism was a popular theory among the American population by the late 19th century. It was the belief that a country must expand in territory and grow in power to survive‚ the theory of evolution applied onto human societies. (History Today Ltd.‚ 45) This belief allowed the government to wage wars and annex other countries while retaining public support‚ despite the lack of a valid reason. Another example of America’s malicious intents could be found
Premium United States
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila THIRD DIVISION G.R. No. 81262 August 25‚ 1989 GLOBE MACKAY CABLE AND RADIO CORP.‚ and HERBERT C. HENDRY‚ Petitioners‚ vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and RESTITUTO M. TOBIAS‚ Respondents. CORTES‚ J.: Private respondent Restituto M. Tobias was employed by petitioner Globe Mackay Cable and Radio Corporation (GLOBE MACKAY) in a dual capacity as a purchasing agent and administrative assistant to the engineering operations manager. In 1972
Premium Law Legal terms Tort
I. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT SHOULD CONTROL MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CLAIMS INVOLVING PRETRAIL DETENTIONS WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE Years ago this Court instructed that the Fourth Amendment should be used to analyze allegedly unconstitutional “detention[s] of suspects pending trial.” Gerstein v. Pugh‚ 420 U.S. 103‚ 125 n.27 (1975). Since then this Court has reaffirmed that the “detention of criminal suspects” is “governed by the provisions of the Fourth Amendment.” Albright v. Oliver‚ 510 U.S. 266‚ 274 (1994)
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Ben Groesbeck Stearns Intro to Criminal Justice October 2‚ 2011 Arson and Fire Investigation What is arson and fire investigation? Arson and fire investigations are conducted to find out whom or what was responsible for creating a fire. It is critical that we know why a fire was created so you can prevent it from ever happening again and also to determine what accelerants were used if any. In this paper I will go into depth on what it takes to become an arson or fire investigator. How do
Premium Police Fire Law enforcement agency
INTRODUCTION Intention‚ motive and malice are the mental element or state of mind of one who aims at bringing about a consequence. The general rule is that intention‚motive and malice are not relevant in the Law of torts. However‚ to every general rule there exceptions‚ this paper will discuss in some detail. the meaning of the three terms of intention‚ motive and malice as used in the Law of torts. In discussing the terms as used in tort‚it is important to note that Tort means a civil wrong
Premium Tort
issues. The textbook revealed that the three categories of torts are intentional torts‚ unintentional torts and strict liability. When it comes to potential tort risks that arise in the business context Team B looks at malicious prosecution. According‚ to the legal dictionary malicious is an action for damages brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been unsuccessfully commenced without Probable Cause and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice
Premium Tort Risk management Management
justice and the good of the community require that the matter should be examined‚ there is said to be a probable cause for‚ making a charge against the accused‚ however malicious the intention of the accuser may have been. And probable cause will be presumed till the contrary appears. In an action‚ then‚ for a malicious prosecution‚
Free Police