Furman Selz LLC (A): A Tale of Two Acquisitions This is the tale of a firm that went on from being a private company to being acquired‚ then becoming a private company again‚ and then re-acquired‚ all with varying levels of success. The protagonist here is the human capital; people of the company who‚ by virtue of mergers & acquisitions‚ fall prey to sometimes poles-apart work cultures and values. Furman Selz Mager Dietz & Birney started as a highly innovative securities research boutique
Premium Mergers and acquisitions
government forms such as tax returns and immigration papers is considered an act of unauthorized practice of law. In The Florida Bar v. Furman‚ the Court stated that Ms. Furman went beyond just transposing information from an intake sheet to a form‚ she was explaining legal remedies‚ construing and interpreting legal effects‚ giving advice on how best
Premium Law Tax Taxation in the United States
did not want to pick such a controversial subject‚ but I grew more and more intrigued as I read deeper into the case of Gregg vs. Georgia in 1976. The case stirred up many views about capital punishment and allowing a criminal to manipulate the wording of our country’s Constitution to refuse personal responsibility. Throughout the research and trying to form an opinion of the case‚ I wondered if the death penalty is:
Premium Gregg v. Georgia Capital punishment Supreme Court of the United States
“The majority is always right”‚ that is what people believe‚ but not in my opinion. Fortunately‚ this wasn’t always the solution as the opinions of great men in history altered the way we live life nowadays. These great men stood up with their opinions and theories of different topics and subjects including warfare and science against opposing majorities and eventually won them over. One of these men‚ and the greatest of them all‚ is our prophet Mohammed (PBUH)‚ the greatest leader and role model
Premium Muhammad Prophet French Revolution
Georgia v. Randolph is a landmark case pertaining to the search of a private resident without a search warrant where one resident gives law enforcement personnel consents to conduct a search and the other member objects. This particular case involved a married couple Scott and Janet Randolph‚ who were having marriage problems. Janet decided to leave Scott taking their son with her to Canada (Wood 2007 para 1). After being gone for a little over a month she and the child returned to the same residents
Premium Family Supreme Court of the United States Mother
Sam Furman Mrs. Hughes English‚ Period 1 20 October 2013 In the Path of Falling objects Vs. Ghost Medicine These two books are both written by the same author only a year apart from each other. From the two books I read these books were very good but I have to say one of them tops the other one from the way the author tells the story‚ and how he uses slang to make it seem like it is an actual person instead of just a character in a fictional book. Andrew Smith can write two completely different
Premium Love Aerosmith Protagonist
Georgia v. Troy Davis Georgia v. Troy Davis Two days following Davis’s conviction on charges of the murder of Officer Mark MacPhail‚ jury recommended the death penalty and Davis was sentenced to death. Officer MacPhail’s family wasn’t allowed to testify but Davis comment with; “Spare my life‚ just give me a second chance. That’s all I ask. I was convicted for offenses that I didn’t commit.” If the victim was still alive to testify‚ he could have confirmed Davis’s statement or better yet identify
Premium Capital punishment Jury Crime
Coker v. Georgia‚ 433 U.S. 584 (1977)‚ held that the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbade the death penalty for the crime of rape of a woman. While serving several sentences for rape‚ kidnapping‚ one count of first degree murder‚ and aggravated assault‚ Ehrlich Anthony Coker escaped from prison. Coker broke into Allen and Elnita Carver’s home near Waycross‚ Georgia‚ raped Elnita Carver and stole the family’s vehicle. Coker was convicted of rape‚ armed robbery‚ and the other
Free Crime Murder Capital punishment
Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
MAJORITY OR INDIVIDUAL Throughout the history‚ philosophers have emerged new ideas about how society govern and how people can be free two of these philosophers are that Jean Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill who are significant philosophers in our world because their ideas about liberty and general will have shaped today’s world. Actually‚ these philosophers have a contrast about liberty since Rousseau has an idea about general will what he explained as majority’s ideas ignores minority’s
Premium Political philosophy Jean-Jacques Rousseau Freedom of speech