Transforming Logical Data Models into Physical Data Models Susan Dash Ralph Reilly IT610-1404A-01 According to an article written by Tom Haughey the process for transforming a logical data model into a physical data model is: The business authorization to proceed is received. Business requirements are gathered and represented in a logical data model which will completely represent the business data requirements and will be non-redundant. The logical model is then transformed into a first cut physical model
Premium Data modeling SQL Database
Abstract This paper will explain several differences between a logical network design and the physical design of a network. Most people tend to think of it as the logical meaning the functional part and the physical as the seeing it part. With saying that one must understand that there is more to the logical and physical design of a network than just the functional and seeing parts. In order for one to understand the differences of how the two operate and work from one to the other‚ one would
Premium
Logical Design Domonic Lastoria Professor Irene Hoskins Strayer University CIS 111 1/19/2013 1. List the advantages of a relational model specific to ACME Global Consulting. The relational database model specified for the ACME Global Consulting organizes given data in table series. Each of the table has fields specified with specifications regarding the data type stored (Easytoteach‚ 2011). The advantages of the relational model includes
Premium Relational model Database SQL
designed. Database design has two parts. The first part is the logical design and the second part is the physical design. Logical Design The logical design is an abstract model which focus on what the system must do in order to meet the requirements of the organization’s needs. The logical design involves gathering the information about the business process‚ business entities‚ and organizational units (Unknown‚ 2001). The logical design is basically a blueprint that identifies the functions requirement
Premium The Real World Object-oriented programming Output
Deductive Thinking Logical thinking is a process that has two different methods. Within logical thinking‚ there is deductive thinking and inductive thinking. In deductive thinking‚ the reasoning starts with either two‚ but can be more premises‚ then results in an ending that follows those premises. The syllogism is used in deductive thinking. Categorical‚ hypothetical‚ and disjunctive syllogisms are three different types used for deductive thinking. A categorical syllogism uses a form of argument
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Critical thinking
PART I Introduction “Living in a semi – urban is indeed difficult where prices of the goods are too high especially when you don’t have money” said Mrs. Rosanie S. Surban‚ 33 years old‚ married with two children‚ currently working as secretary in LGU‚ Barangay 5‚ San Francisco Agusan del Surand whose husband is Mr. Ariel S. Surban‚ a plain househusband. Mrs. Surban has salary of at least P8‚000 per month and her husband is earning nothing. Her salary cannot suffice their household expenses
Premium Debt Debtor Marriage
Also known as logical empiricism‚ rational empiricism or neo-positivism‚ logical positivism is the name given in 1931 by A.E Blumberg and Herbert Feigl to a set of philosophical ideas put forward by the Vienna Circle. This Vienna Circle was a group of early twentieth century philosophers who sought to re-conceptualize empiricism by means of their interpretation of then recent advances in the physical and formal sciences. Hence‚ the Vienna Circle represented a radical “anti-metaphysical” stance which
Premium Philosophy Empiricism
Logical Fallacies Defined Abstract Fallacies can be viewed as a mistake or error. There are many different fallacies with different meanings for each. The following paper will discuss 9 logical fallacies. The paper will also include definitions for each of the 9 fallacies as well as examples of being applied to real life scenarios. Logical Fallacies defined Everyone has gotten into an argument with someone once or twice in their lifetime. Some people have mastered their skills in
Premium Argument Fallacy Critical thinking
argument is an argument in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support (Atheism Web). Fallacies of distraction attempt to distract from the falsity of an argument by the illegitimate use of logical operators (Stephen ’s Guide to Logical Fallacies). False Dilemma. In this fallacy‚ the distraction lies in the wording of the argument. It is worded so that we are only given two alternatives. One of which is sometimes so outrageous as to be unacceptable‚ while
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Argumentation theory
one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement that can be either true or false that is offered to support a claim. The claim is the conclusion that can be either true or false. Arguments can be deductive or inductive. Deductive vs. Inductive A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises appear to provide complete support for the conclusion. An inductive argument is an argument such that the premises appear to provide some degree of support for the conclusion. If
Premium Logic Deductive reasoning Argument