CRITICAL THINKING PSU LOGICAL FALLACIES Ad hominem or ATTACKING THE PERSON. Attacking the arguer rather than his/her argument. Example: John’s objections to capital punishment carry no weight since he is a convicted felon. Note: Saying something negative about someone is not automatically ad hominem. If a person (politician for example) is the issue‚ then it is not a fallacy to criticize him/her. Ad ignorantium or APPEAL TO IGNORANCE. Arguing on the basis of what is not known and cannot be
Premium Logic Logical fallacies Fallacy
Also known as logical empiricism‚ rational empiricism or neo-positivism‚ logical positivism is the name given in 1931 by A.E Blumberg and Herbert Feigl to a set of philosophical ideas put forward by the Vienna Circle. This Vienna Circle was a group of early twentieth century philosophers who sought to re-conceptualize empiricism by means of their interpretation of then recent advances in the physical and formal sciences. Hence‚ the Vienna Circle represented a radical “anti-metaphysical” stance which
Premium Philosophy Empiricism
Logical Fallacies Defined Abstract Fallacies can be viewed as a mistake or error. There are many different fallacies with different meanings for each. The following paper will discuss 9 logical fallacies. The paper will also include definitions for each of the 9 fallacies as well as examples of being applied to real life scenarios. Logical Fallacies defined Everyone has gotten into an argument with someone once or twice in their lifetime. Some people have mastered their skills in
Premium Argument Fallacy Critical thinking
argument is an argument in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support (Atheism Web). Fallacies of distraction attempt to distract from the falsity of an argument by the illegitimate use of logical operators (Stephen ’s Guide to Logical Fallacies). False Dilemma. In this fallacy‚ the distraction lies in the wording of the argument. It is worded so that we are only given two alternatives. One of which is sometimes so outrageous as to be unacceptable‚ while
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Argumentation theory
overcome by a person’s emotions‚ faulting in recognizing reason. Logical thinking is useful when a person wants to decide whether there is enough information to understand what has been offered. It is a thinking process when an individual use his or her way of thinking to arrive to a conclusion. A logical thinking problem calls for organization‚ for associations involving facts‚ and for a logic that “make sense”. Logical thinking is a skilled psychological process. An open question is expected
Premium Critical thinking Thought Reasoning
Jarboe I February 8‚ 2011 Logical Fallacies Before we can understand what a logical fallacy is‚ we establish some common background information for the purposes of accurate communication. There are two types of reasoning‚ inductive and deductive. The primary difference between the two is that inductive reasoning automatically allows for an appeal to probability‚ the assumption that what could happen will happen‚ while deductive reasoning considers this a logical fallacy. Thus for the purposes
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Deductive reasoning
designed. Database design has two parts. The first part is the logical design and the second part is the physical design. Logical Design The logical design is an abstract model which focus on what the system must do in order to meet the requirements of the organization’s needs. The logical design involves gathering the information about the business process‚ business entities‚ and organizational units (Unknown‚ 2001). The logical design is basically a blueprint that identifies the functions requirement
Premium The Real World Object-oriented programming Output
CHAPTER XIV Logical Empiricism There are many strange sentences that men use. Compare these two: (1) Wheat is a major crop in Kansas‚ and (2) the fountain of youth is located in Kansas. Each has a subject‚ a verb‚ and a predicate. The first sentence is regarded as true in a matter-of-fact way. The second one may bring a smile or wrinkle to your face. Why the two reactions? Why is one regarded as true and the other as fiction? How can we speak of the non-existent in the same way as
Premium Metaphysics
Logical Fallacies Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning‚ defects that weaken arguments. At first they might seem correct. but if they are examined closely‚ it is obvious that they are incorrect. Critical thinkers recognize these fallacies in newspapers‚ advertisements‚ and other places so they can make good decisions in all areas of their lives. Here are some of the most common fallacies: Circular Reasoning: Supporting a premise with a premise‚ rather than a conclusion. In other words‚
Free Critical thinking Logic Argument
A logical framework for the early girl child marriage elimination project. Narrative summary Objectively verifiable indicators Means of verification Assumptions. Goals( Development obj.) Overall number of school girls engaged in early and forced marriage in Mandera County to be eliminated. Number of school going girls forced to out of school for the purpose of marriage in Mandera County. Secondary data that becomes available over the course of the project including: i) Reports from schools
Free Marriage Arranged marriage Sociology