as an interrogation. Interrogation as opposed to interviewing is designed to match acquired information to a particular suspect in order to secure a confession; it is the process of testing that information and its application to a particular suspect. By means of interrogation we would be able to eliminate the innocent or identify the guilty. (Swanson‚ Chamelin‚ Territo & Taylor‚ 2012) There are circumstance’s where the investigator may go directly from an interview to an interrogation occurs
Premium Criminal law Arrest warrant Scientific method
1960 until 1964 the Escobedo v. Illinois trial was taking place. This trial was over whether or not Escobedo’s rights were violated when he was arrested. Throughout Escobedo’s arrest and interrogation his constitutional rights were indeed violated‚ as he was not allowed to see his lawyer during his interrogation. Yet without a specific law in place it took various levels of the United States court system to come up with a final verdict for this case. As a result‚ Escobedo’s Rule was established
Premium Crime Murder Jury
be an effective means of obtaining information. In 2014‚ just three years ago‚ the psychologist and architect of the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program‚ James Mitchell‚ gave an in-depth interview with the Guardian Newspaper‚ breaking a seven-year long silence on the issue. Mitchell took exception to a newly released committe report that “found that the interrogation techniques devised by Mitchell. . . were far more brutal than disclosed at the time‚ and did not yield useful intelligence. These
Premium United States Crime Ethics
transparency and open government. On 06 Dec 02‚ the subject of the first Special Interrogation Plan was forced to wear a woman’s bra and had a thong placed on his head during the course of the interrogation. On 17 Dec 02‚ the subject of the first Special Interrogation Plan was told that his mother and sister were whores. On 20 Dec 02‚ an interrogator tied a leash to the subject of the first Special Interrogation Plan’s chains‚ led him around the room‚ and forced him to perform a series of dog
Premium Osama bin Laden Al-Qaeda Taliban
upon the people of Salem‚ Massachusetts in the 1600’s recounted in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. The manner of the interrogations is extremely similar in both situations. In McCarthy’s interrogations‚ everyone is treated roughly in the same manner and accused wrongfully. Similarly in The Crucible‚ the accused are questioned repeatedly until they are broken. In Langston Hughes’ interrogation‚ some of the questions he is asked are as follows: “Have you ever been a Communist? … Have you ever attended a
Premium Salem witch trials The Crucible United States
confessions. These cases were then addressed together by the Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Miranda was identified by a witness and arrested‚ but was not notified of his rights‚ although he singed a written confession after several hours of interrogation that stated that he was aware of the rights he was not notified about. A jury was presented an oral admission of guilt‚ as well as the written confession. The jury found Mr. Miranda guilty of murder and rape‚ and sentenced him to 20-30 years on
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Police
are simply a precaution to guarantee protection against self –incrimination. Without the Miranda rights‚ the treatment of criminals would not be fair. If a criminal remains silent throughout the interrogation ‚ the interrogation must stop and a the criminal asks for an attorney ‚ the interrogation must stop until the attorney
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
for two hours. After the interrogation‚ Mr. Miranda had confessed to the crimes‚ and provided officers with a written confession. Language at the top of the written confession stated that the confession was given freely and voluntarily without any threats or promises. In addition‚ the language stated that Mr. Miranda was fully aware of his legal rights. However‚ Mr. Miranda was not advised that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation. Subsequently‚ the statement
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States
Amanda Montalvo Law Politics and Government Prof. Kent Worcester 10/13/12 The Violence in Cheneyland On the upper east side of Manhattan‚ the reverberations from the drill and blast excavation for the Second Avenue Subway station drums up a chilling reminder for native New Yorkers of the early post 9/11 days. I was in middle school but I understood that New York City was targeted and my life was put in danger but I did not realize that still 11 years later I would never be able to escape
Premium George W. Bush September 11 attacks Bill Clinton
Janet Ainsworth’s journal article‚ “’You Have the Right to Remain Silent. . .’ But Only If You Ask for It Just So: The Role of Linguistic Ideology in American Police Interrogation Law‚” addresses the complexities that arise when attempting to invoke Miranda rights. Ainsworth begins the article by explaining how the Miranda rights were established as a compromise with its initial goal to alleviate pressure from those detained. She references the Davis v United States case as a key example due to its
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Police