Compare and contrast positivist and interpretive perspectives underpinning social research- This essay intends to investigate by comparing and contrasting positivist and interpretive perspectives that surround social research. It will look into the use of methods such as quantitative and qualitative research and the effects and outcomes that this has in relation to social research. This will include the variations amongst them in both a positive and negative light. Before research can be undertaken
Premium Quantitative research Scientific method Sociology
Exploring Research Methodologies: Positivism and Interpretivism Before a researcher can initiate a research project‚ they face the confusion and the range of theoretical perspectives‚ methodologies‚ methods‚ and the philosophical basis that encompasses them all. This seemingly meticulous structure for the research process is in fact aimed toward providing the researcher with a scaffolding’‚ or a direction which they can go on to develop themselves to coincide with their particular research purposes
Premium Scientific method Quantitative research Sociology
Positivism vs Interpretivism Positivism is an approach in sociology that believes society can be studied using similar scientific techniques to those used in the natural sciences. (Browne‚ 2006) This concept tends to produce quantitative data and Concerned with hypothesis testing. (Collis and Hussey‚ 2003) Interpretivism is an approach emphasizing that people have consciousness involving personal beliefs‚ values and interpretations and these influence the way they act. They do not simply respond
Premium
societies‚ which propagate individualism and freedom of choice more than societies before. Other schools of thought‚ namely structuralism‚ disagree and challenge this view by stating that their own theories are still significant and criticising interpretivism. The interpretivist theory takes a contrasting stance to structuralists on looking at society. Interpretive or social action perspectives examine smaller groups within society and unlike structuralism‚ are concerned with the subjective states
Premium Sociology
Two criminological approaches that have the origin in contemporary criminology are classicism and positivism. Classicism has the origin in the eighteenth century and positivism in the nineteenth. Both‚ the classical and the positivism theory are expanded in the past with their own roots‚ but in today criminal justice system are still alive. Classicism was first developed by Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham‚ two famous writers which propose in their works that both law and administration of justice
Free Criminology Crime Criminal justice
Logical Positivism: Schlick versus Neurath Question 1 First of all‚ Schlick and Neurath led two different wings in Vienna circle. Schlick and Waismann belong to the right wing which has the faith to Mach/Wittgenstein’s view: knowledge rests on basic statement describing experience. However‚ the left wing led by Neurath rejected that view. Second‚ Schlick was convinced of the correspondence between propositions and states. While Neurath opposed Schlick’s view‚ but he stated the existence
Premium Scientific method Philosophy of science Science
Positivism: the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge Positivism is a philosophy developed by Auguste Comte (widely regarded as the first true sociologist) in the middle of the 19th century that stated that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge‚ and that such knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method. This view is sometimes referred to as a scientist ideology‚ and is often shared by technocrats who believe in the necessary
Premium Scientific method Science Sociology
Positivism refers to a set of epistemological perspectives and philosophies of science which hold that the scientific method is the best approach to uncovering the processes by which both physical and human events occur. Though the positivist approach has been a ’recurrent theme in the history of western thought from the Ancient Greeks to the present day’ [1] the concept was developed in the early 19th century by the philosopher and founding sociologist‚ Auguste Comte. | Positivism was a method
Premium Sociology Positivism Scientific method
Lucille Ann Carreon‚ Joseph Valerian Timtim‚ Kimberly Loide Viernes‚ Gerald Paul Nature of Law Legal Positivism There are a lot of theorists who pioneered in the concept of Legal Positivism.But among them are two leading theorists who mainly contributed on this idea and further argued on each other’s respective opposite views. One of which is John Austin‚ who holds that legal positivism is the nature of law which deals with the existence and contents of law based on social facts and not on
Premium Jurisprudence Law
Also known as logical empiricism‚ rational empiricism or neo-positivism‚ logical positivism is the name given in 1931 by A.E Blumberg and Herbert Feigl to a set of philosophical ideas put forward by the Vienna Circle. This Vienna Circle was a group of early twentieth century philosophers who sought to re-conceptualize empiricism by means of their interpretation of then recent advances in the physical and formal sciences. Hence‚ the Vienna Circle represented a radical “anti-metaphysical” stance which
Premium Philosophy Empiricism