Voidable contract is a contract that has legal effect and force when it is made‚ but is liable to be subsequently annulled or set aside by the courts through the process of recission. Due to the section 10 of the Contracts Act provides‚ all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract. As what i’ve been thought and my understanding‚ there are five causes which lead to the voidable contract. They are : 1. Coercion (S.15) 2. Undue influence (S.16)
Premium Contract Contract law
creating brand equity Creating brand equity Marketers build brand quality by creating the right brand knowledge structures with the right consumers. Building brand equity 3 sets of brand equity drivers. -Initial choices for the brand elements or identities making up the brand (brand names‚ URLs‚ logos‚ symbols‚ -product and service and all accompanying marketing activities and supporting marketing programs – way brand is integrated into supporting marketing program -associations indirectly
Premium Brand Marketing Brand management
are two aspects of validity‚ internal validity and external validity. Internal validity refers to an approximate truth about inferences regarding causal relationships. Internal validity is only necessary in circumstances where there is a need to establish a cause and effect relationship. External validity is closely related to generalizing‚ and the ability to generalize a particular study to other people and other situations. This short paper will discuss both internal and external validity‚ and the
Premium Causality External validity Logic
SALES CONTRACT Date: April 25‚ 2013 Between: ABC Trading Co‚ Ltd. (Vietnam) Address: Fax: Represented by: Hereinafter referred to the Seller And: NZ Co‚ Ltd. (Japan). Address: Fax: Represented by: Hereinafter referred to the Buyer Both parties have agreed to sign the contract with the following terms and conditions 1. COMMODITY: Vietnam Robusta Coffee‚ Daklak origin 2. QUALITY: According to the sample agreed by both parties (Sample No 2345) 3. QUANTITY:
Premium Force majeure Arbitration Contract
Number: Identification card number : Group : Lecturer’s name: The issue in this case deals with invatition to treat ‚ offer ‚ counter-offer ‚ conditional acceptance and acceptance . It also deals with the elements of valid contract. General rule for a binding contract is an offer and an acceptance of the proposal. There must be effective communication to the proposer. It is very important to differeciate a proposal from an invitation to treat. Invitation to treat is a stage of negotiation and
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Internal & Managerial Control “Internal (Management) Control is the set of accounting & administrative controls and practices that help ensure that approved and appropriate decisions are made in an organization” * in other words‚ to make sure that the right thing happens and the wrong thing does not happen‚ either purposely or accidentally Why Internal Control? 1. To safeguard the assets against waste‚ loss & misuse 2. Check the accuracy and reliability of accounting data
Premium Management Auditing Audit
Zidisha Microfinance Member Legal Contract This is a legally binding contract between (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________ of Address ____________________________________________________________________________________ and National Identity Number ___________________________ and Zidisha Inc. (Zidisha)‚ a nonprofit organization located at 21900 Muirfield Circle #302‚ Sterling‚ Virginia 20164 United States. I‚ (Applicant Name) ____________________________________________
Premium Debt Credit Interest
Internal Branding: Internal branding is the set of strategic processes that align and empower employees to deliver the appropriate customer experience in a consistent fashion. These processes include‚ but are not limited to‚ internal communications‚ training support‚ leadership practices‚ reward and recognition programs‚ recruitment practices and sustainability factors. Internal branding making sure that members of the organization are properly aligned with the brand ad what it represents. Internal
Premium Brand Brand management
------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Sharecrop Contracts of the 1882 was a contract that seemed to be for the landowners and not for the actual sharecropper. The landowners seem to not really take care of the sharecroppers in any way. The landowner’s responsibilities seem to only be to supply the land or more like renting it and reaping the profits of the share croppers in order to keep them in debt to the landowners and never actually freeing them to own their own
Premium Property Renting Common law
By the case of Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was establish and the derivation of modern doctrine of it is to be found in the The doctrine of Promissory Estoppel was first developed but was lost for some time until it was resurrected by Lord Denning in the leading case of Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd. Promissory estoppel There are three exceptions to the rule in Pinnel’s case. They are composite agreement‚ payment of debt
Premium Contract Common law Law