Template Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier I‚ Kamryn Foster‚ write this opinion to support the majority on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. In my opinion it reflects the majority being as it’s the school’s tabloid. I also believe the school has the right to remove pages if they deem the material inappropriate. These articles would not have been in the best interest for the students. The students feel it is freedom of speech‚ but the administration feels it is unfitting for a school newspaper. (Second paragraph–Explain
Premium
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier I‚ _______‚ agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students‚ or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes‚ we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely‚ but most students are minors and
Premium Education First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
I‚ Jessica‚ write this opinion to majority on the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier. The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights‚ but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others‚ he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image
Premium Freedom of speech First Amendment to the United States Constitution Human rights
The case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier is a very interesting case because it requires the courts to balance two very important values of American society‚ freedom of speech and education. Many Americans have made countless sacrifices to ensure that we can enjoy both freedom of speech and one of the best education systems in the world. Due to the fact that these values are so important to the American people‚ it is no surprise that the decision had to be ultimately made by the Supreme Court of the United
Premium Education High school School
4.03 The Decision Judicial Opinion Template Instructions: Replace the information in parentheses with your own work according to the assessment instructions. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier I‚ Richard Enerson‚ write this opinion to support the majority opinion on the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. I am in support of the majority opinion because I firmly believe the principal was not violating the student’s first amendment rights by censoring the articles. While students do have the right to speech‚ it should
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
In St. Louis‚ Missouri in the spring of 1983‚ the journalism students of Hazelwood East High School completed their final edition for the school year and allowed their school principal to review it before sending it to be printed. The principal‚ Robert Reynolds‚ decided an article concerning divorce was unfair and personal as well as an article about teen pregnancy was inappropriate. Reynolds was afraid the students would miss their deadline if they tried to change the stories and felt the best option
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech High school
prohibit the publishing of certain articles‚which he believes we’re inappropriate‚ in the school newspaper violate the student journalists’ First Amendment right of freedom of speech? This issue was discussed after a student named Catherine Kuhlmeier in Hazelwood East High school in St.Louis County‚ Missouri was enrolled in a journalism class II in which she was writing a newspaper known as “The Spectrum”with other students. Two of those articles contained a story of parents being divorced and a story
Premium
1988 found a high school journalism class challenging whether or not they had their First Amendment violated when their freedom of speech was challenged. The Hazelwood Spectrum was a newspaper done by East Hazelwood High School in the Hazelwood School District and students whom completed the class Journalism I were able to work for the schcaool newspaper as a Journalism II student. Kathy Kuhimeier and two other journalism students wrote articles on pregnancy and divorce‚ which were declined by
Premium Education High school Teacher
Morse vs. Frederick The school suspended Frederick for ten days because he held a banner that read “Bong Hits for Jesus.” He is suing the school under 42 U.S.C. 1983‚ with a violation of his first amendment rights. Did the school error when they took away Joseph Frederick’s banner and suspended him? The District Court held that the student was in the wrong‚ which was proven. They also decided that the school had the right to punish him for his message. Although it was not known if Frederick’s
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Bethel School District v. Fraser
Hazelwood vs Kuhlmeier 1. Why did the newspaper advisor give the paper to Principal Reynolds for review? Was this standard procedure? This was not a standard procedure because it gave away the rights of the students. 2. What concerns did Principal Reynolds have regarding the two articles? Were these legitimate concerns? Do you think the principal had any options other than deleting entire pages from the student paper? The Concerns of Principal Reynolds were legitimate because the articles were
Premium Education United States Teacher