Preview

Hazelwood Vs Kuhlmeier Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hazelwood Vs Kuhlmeier Case Study
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students. It was ruled that the school wasprhibited
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marvin Pickering Case Summary
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marvin Pickering Case Summary

    However, this protection is not without limits. There is still a professional duty to protect confidentiality and not cause disruption to the operation of a school. Basically, teachers do not have carte blanche freedom of speech if it can be proven to be or create a substantial disturbance within the school community. Because Pickering was able to show the court that he thought his statements were true, I believe there seemed to be a lack of malice on his part. The Board of Education asserted at every level of the court system that his statements were unjustified, and damaged the reputations of its members (Essex, 2012). I agree with the decision and think the case lacked the evidence that his words even if untrue or unfounded really affected students and school as a…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kearlsey Case Study
    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kearlsey Case Study

    Tony Kearsley applies for a position as a firefighter with the City of St. Catharines and was accepted on condition that he were to pass a medical examination by a doctor specified by the city. However, during the medical exam the doctor discovered that Kearsley had an atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and refused to pass him. Kearsley took it upon himself to consult a medical specialist who advised him that his condition would indeed not affect his ability to perform his job as a firefighter. Kearsley then filed a complaint against the city with the Ontario Human Rights Commission. At the Commissions Bored of Inquiry hearing, the doctor who had originally examined Kearsley testified that atrial fibrillation led to increased risk for stroke meaning his heart could fail to pump sufficient blood to his organs during the extreme conditions that come with firefighting. The Board of Inquiry called a medical expert in atrial fibrillation. The expert testified that the increased risk for stroke in someone of Kearsley’s age was inconsequential. The expert further testified that there was no increased risk for heart failure in someone like Kearsley because he was otherwise in good health. Meanwhile, after Kearsley got turned down by the St. Catharines fire department, Kearsley had become a firefighter in the City of Hamilton, achieving the rank of first-class firefighter in October 2001.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Kingwood, Texas
    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Kingwood, Texas

    The community that I choose is Kingwood, Texas, this area is located in the north area of the City of Houston, located mainly in the Harris County with a small portion of Montgomery County. The boundaries for the Kingwood community are the roads: North Park Drive at north, West Lake Houston Parkway at west, Highway 59 and the Loop 494 on the east, and FM 1960 at the south; the San Jacinto river runs through the…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hazelwood Vs. Kuhlmeier Case
    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hazelwood Vs. Kuhlmeier Case

    In my opinion it reflects the majority being as it’s the school’s tabloid. I also believe the school has the right to remove pages if they deem the material inappropriate. These articles would not have been in the best interest for the students. The students feel it is freedom of speech, but the administration feels it is unfitting for a school newspaper.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bethel V Fraser

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reynolds Vs Kudhlmeier Case Study
    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reynolds Vs Kudhlmeier Case Study

    Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hazelmeier Case Summary
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hazelmeier Case Summary

    It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Goss V Lopez Brief
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Goss V Lopez Brief

    Public school students from Columbus, Ohio brought this suit. They claimed that their constitutional right to due process was violated. The students were suspended without hearing prior to their suspension. They were suspended for destroying school property but principals can only suspend up to 10 days or expel them. If suspended they must notify parents without 24 hours and give the reasons. Students may appeal to the board of education.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brown V. Cabell 598 Summary
    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brown V. Cabell 598 Summary

    In addressing your second question of Donnie’s rights being violated due to his writing “Zero Tolerance Sucks” on his t-shirt, A public school has an obligation to provide a safe and secure educational environment for all students. This is a very sensitive subject in our society. What one person deems to be perfectly fine is seriously offensive to another. School boards across the country are having to monitor and…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Garner Vo-Tech Case Study
    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Garner Vo-Tech Case Study

    Schools may regulate student speech that results in a material and substantial disruption within the school. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 509, 513 (1969). Garner Vo-Tech must show either that there was an actual disruption within the school or that officials reasonably anticipated a material and substantial disruption was likely to occur. Alternatively, the Court could expand the exception found in Morse that waives the disruption requirement and include speech that calls for the bullying and harassment of a specific student. Morse v. Fredrick, 551 U.S. 393, 407 (2007).…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court Case Of Tinker V. Des Moines
    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court Case Of Tinker V. Des Moines

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Bong Hits for Jesus”
    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Bong Hits for Jesus”

    In my ruling, the illegal glorification of the drug culture “Bong hits for Jesus”. I feel the school had made a bad judgment call about having the banner. I feel it is not an attack on the saying “Bong hits for Jesus”. I feel that this is an attack on the student’s first amendment rights, just because the sign had something to do with marijuana. The school has an anti- drug program. I believe a non- disruptive pin, shirt, banner, etc. should not be taking from a student, for the shear fact that they oppose the anti-drug programs that the school offers. It is an attack on their first amendments rights. It was a 15-foot joke. The school dose has the right to not tolerate an interruption of a school sponsored anti-drug event. But this was not this kind of an event and the banner was not placed on school grounds. The banner was placed across the street from the school in a public open forum. One cannot be punished for holding of a banner not on school property. I feel that the principal was wrong to hastily take the banner down in the heat of the moment, but feel she should not pay punitive damages, for the banner was not worth much. Though the pride of the student’s who put the banner up was hurt a little I feel they should not be punished for expressing their first amendment rights, which they demonstrated non-violently, very conformed manner, and not on school property.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Importance Of Censorship In A College Newspaper
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Importance Of Censorship In A College Newspaper

    Dear Administration, I think that there should be some censorship when it comes to a college newspaper. Censorship should be limited, but also should be enforced in some way. They should be allowed freedom of speech as long as the posts are not offensive to the students in any way. The newspaper should positively represent the university but also give freedom for the people who write it to express themselves in a sensible way. The writers should be able to make the newspaper relatable and not so "proper" and should be able to relate to all students and student events. Censorship of the writers can cause the newspaper to not be authentic. I believe that freedom of speech is the best way for a newspaper to be original; but it should also contain…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis: The Coddling Of The American Mind
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis: The Coddling Of The American Mind

    Why go to college if you don’t want to learn? If we censor everything harmful then we become more ignorant of the world. The article mentions cognitive behavioral therapy which teaches good critical thinking skills. It offers good solution to trigger warnings. I think this therapy needs to be use more often because it teaches us to think more objectively rather than subjectively. Think subjectively distorts our way of thinking especially in the classroom. This way of thinking offers a solution to overcoming our fears and hypersensitivity. It is unfair that teachers and administration have to make adjustment to their course because someone feels offended. I find some of the examples given where people are being charged with harassment completely ridiculous. I believe by coddling the American mind is a disservice to students. We don’t live in a Utopia where everyone says nice things. The sooner students learn this, the better of they will be in the…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Schools And Censorship: Banned Books
    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schools And Censorship: Banned Books

    It’s ignorant to even challenge a book because of its content. In the article, Schools and Censorship: Banned Books it states that, “Every day someone tries to control or otherwise restrict oral expressions, broadcast messages, or written words.” Trying to control what others read is foolish! In fact, Everyone should have the right to read what they want. Especially teenagers, which are entering adulthood and should know to make the right decisions. Moreover, in the article it also states that “our basic right — the freedom to express ourselves as we see fit — is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States' Constitution, ensuring the freedom to express one's opinion even if that opinion might be considered unpopular or unorthodox.” It’s like our right is being violated. Many children are being pulled away from books because they contain certain things that their parents think are not appropriate for their age, but it’s not like they should hide those things from…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics