GROUP PROCESS IN THE CHALLENGER LAUNCH DECISION: ANALYSIS: NASA was created with the intent to establish military culture‚ US dominance over USSR. Morton Thiokol‚ Inc.‚ an aerospace company‚ manufactured the solid propellant rocket motors manufactured the booster rockets SRB used to launch the Challenger Shuttle. Morton Thiokol called for a teleconference‚ fortnight before the launch had been scheduled to discuss the O ring problem. The Challenger launch was disaster due to various reasons:
Premium Space Shuttle Rocket
The Process of Group Decision Making INTRO: Many authors and theorists have different approaches to group decision making. Some differ from a couple of steps to five steps. The book however likes to use a seven step approach. A good example of our subject is this assignment itself. As a group we come together and form a solid opinion on which topic or assignment we should take. The book suggests that we follow a couple of guidelines when coming across a topic. As a group‚ we should be wording the
Premium Decision making Decision theory Risk
Rachel White The Challenger On January 28th‚ 1986‚ the Challenger‚ a space shuttle‚ was to make an important journey into outer space. The challenger launch took the attention from many Americans. A woman named Christa McAuliffe‚ an average American school teacher was also on the journey. Christa McAuliffe was going to give school lessons to students from space. Children were anxious to Learn from space‚ and adults everywhere were fascinated. The morning of January 28‚ 1986 was going to be
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Columbia
2.1 Group process: inclusion A cornerstone for facilitators is to understand what happens to people in groups. To do this‚ we need to look both at what people set out to achieve‚ the task‚ as well as how they get along – the processes of group activity. People often behave quite differently in groups and teams from one-to-one settings. Some people become quiet‚ others turn into bullies or tormentors‚ some become jokers. For the facilitator who has to rely on others for getting the job done‚ this
Premium Marketing Management Brand
The Gravity Probe B Launch Decision – Case Study Gravity Probe B (GP-B) was a satellite based mission funded by NASA. Efforts were led by the Stanford University physics department and Lockheed Martin‚ Stanford University being the primary contractor and Lockheed Martin as the subcontractor. Rex Geveden‚ the Deputy Center Director at Marshall Space Flight Center‚ was the Program Manager at NASA and the primary leader of the GP-B launch mission. The mission objective was to test two of the predictions
Premium Risk Decision making Flipism
The Challenger Disaster By: Kathy Neuner & Jeremy Rider Executive Summary Many factors must be examined to find the underlying reason for the horrible disaster of the space shuttle Challenger. We will cover both the technical causes to the disaster and the communication breakdown with NASA. We will also look at the outside pressure that NASA was receiving from the media‚ congress and the military. Recommendations for NASA and anyone in the communication field will be given. These recommendations
Premium Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Columbia
The Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster – Organisational Causes Introduction The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster has been well investigated and analysed as a typical management case by numerous researchers. Although the disaster is the direct result of a technical issue‚ the hardware failure of a solid rocket booster (SRB) O-ring caused by abnormally low temperatures‚ there is an unambiguous relationship between the disaster and numerous organizational factors such as communication (Gouran et
Premium Space Shuttle Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle Columbia
Decision making takes considerable time and effort. The problem I see with making group decisions is the time you take to evaluate each option. The more people you have in a group‚ the more opinions are shared and it becomes difficult to reach a consensus. It is key to define what the problem is and who will be affected by the decision. Decisions that will be affecting a group will need to be addressed with the group or at least a fair representation of the group. For example‚ I work at a high
Premium Education Teacher High school
QUESTION 2 a) Describe the four (4) types of consumer buying behavior. (10 marks) b) Mr. Kareem is a managing director of a software company and he is planning to purchase a new car for his family. Identify and demonstrate the stages in his buying decision process. (15 marks) c) QUESTION 3 a) Identify two (2) types of the environmental forces that affect the company’s ability to serve its customer. (5 marks) As a new marketing manager working for an automotive manufacturer‚ you are required to develop
Premium Marketing Pricing
weaknesses of group decision making which may perhaps lead to an improvement in organisational decision making. In order for an organisation to exist there must be a collection of people trying to achieve the same purpose. Several issues arise when a group comes together to discuss ideas and formulate plans effecting the organisation. Performance becomes more effective and efficient when proper techniques are used to accomplish a specific task or activity. Brainstorming‚ the nominal group technique as
Premium Decision making