Provide an example in which you can use deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion. State the axioms or premises used to reach the conclusion. Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game that she will not be able to cheer at the game. Karen misses practice on Tuesday‚ the day before the game. Karen was not allowed to cheer at Wednesday’s game. Deductive Reasoning: (Premises) Fact: Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game she will not
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
Essay #1: Analysis of an Argument Martin Luther King Jr.’s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" King’s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" is a profound and persuasive written argument that captures emotion encompassing rigid life experiences‚ educated observances‚ and deeply rooted spiritual beliefs. In this letter King freely expresses his position concerning the injustice that blacks faced. This injustice was segregation‚ "the system of laws and customs separating blacks and whites that whites used
Premium
Causal Argument: Will Lowering the Drinking Age Solve the Problem of Binge Drinking among College Students? Research has supported the observation that young people in America consume alcohol regularly; this prevalence of use increases rapidly during adolescence‚ as well as a few years afterward (Wagenaar and Wolfson 37). This has come to be a problem among college students. It has been shown through extensive quantitative and qualitative research that those under twenty-one years of age are
Premium
and contrast deductive and inductive arguments There are two types of arguments: deductive and inductive. In a deductive argument‚ provided the premises are true‚ the conclusion is certainly true. For example: All ducks are birds (premise). Daffy is a duck (premise). Therefore‚ Daffy is a bird (conclusion). Deductive arguments are used by rationalists‚ because they use reason rather than experience‚ and provide certainty rather than probability. Deductive arguments are most used in the field of
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Deductive reasoning
1. I see many differences from a deductive approach to the research: the fact itself that this research is qualitative‚ often lead to implement the “opposite” approach‚ the inductive one. Evidence of this are various and enough clear: - to go there on the field is not really a prerogative of the deductive approach: instead‚ what usually happens is that many quantitative data are gathered‚ with strongly structured and often impersonal methods. So‚ what happens in the case we’re dealing with is clearly
Free Scientific method
compare to renewable energy development. In fact‚ even the nuclear industry has estimated the cost to build nuclear reactor precisely‚ the final cost result three times higher than the plan and it tend to be unpredictable (Greenpeace‚ 2009). For example‚ India that has experienced in constructing nuclear reactor faced to 300 % over budget and the same problem happened in Finland that faced to 1‚5 billion over budget when construct new nuclear reactor (Greenpeace‚ 2009). It cannot be denied that
Premium
INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH APPROACH Meritorious Prof. Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney Director UBIT Chairman Department of Computer Science University of Karachi burney@computer.org www.drburney.net Designed and Assisted by Hussain Saleem hussainsaleem@uok.edu.pk 06th March 2008 "Well begun is half done" --Aristotle‚ quoting an old proverb 2 Research Methods In research‚ we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive approaches. Research
Premium Logic
9-17-13 Two forms of argument 1) Deductive= provides logically conclusive spport for the conclusion Valid-if the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false Invalid- it fail to provide support Sound-the argument is valid and the premises are all true Unsound- an argument with true premises that lead to a false conclusion 2) Inductive-provides probable support for the conclusion Strong-premises are true conclusion is probably true cogent-premises are true argument is strong Weak-in
Premium Logic Argument
discuss grammar teaching. This chapter includes 5 titles. The first one is: A) Introducing Grammar This part of the chapter gives us examples and principles on how to introduce a grammatical function or a grammatical structure. Examples given here are actually based on inductive methods of grammar teaching. First I want to give you a brief comparison of inductive and traditional methods of grammar teaching. Traditional Method: 1- It defines rules and exceptions at the first place explicitly.
Premium Grammar Education Learning
text with an objective appraisal of the Scripture‚ and be able to apply the truth gleaned to one’s life. To that end‚ many Bible scholars and teachers prefer the Inductive Bible Study method. Inductive Study follows a three step process of 1) Observation‚ 2) Interpretation‚ and 3) Application. One writer has noted that the Inductive Bible Study method “involves a careful scrutiny of every word of a particular text—combing through‚ making observations via repeated readings‚ and ultimately discovering
Premium Bible God New Testament