Doctrine of fixtures in property law The doctrine of fixtures is applied to determine if an object is a fixture.1 This common law provides that what is annexed to the land becomes part of the land‚ “quicquid plantatur solo‚ solo credit”‚ and adopts the character of real property.2 For this to transpire all circumstances surrounding the annexation to the land are examined‚ including but not limited to the degree of annexation and the purpose of annexation.3 Through this both objective and subjective
Premium Property Contract Law
ATS1259 The 1967 Referendum The 1967 referendum was the repeal of section 127 and section 51 in the Commonwealth Constitution. With the repeal of these two sections the “Federal Government were allowed to make laws for Aborigines and Aborigines were now counted in the national census”(About the 1967 Referendum). The 1967 referendum can be commonly considered the turning point in Australian history and culture for finally addressing discrimination towards the Indigenous people and taking responsibility
Premium Indigenous Australians
Motivations for the 1967 War in the Middle East Introduction: Overview of the War The 1967 war in the Middle East took place between Israel and its Arab neighbours (primarily Egypt)‚ and lasted six days. However‚ it had much deeper-rooted motives and involved many other key players – both from the Arab states and internationally (such as America and the former Soviet Union). It is important to examine the motives behind both the regional and international players who were involved in the war‚
Premium Israel
the statute or statutory construction. Consequently‚ most of the Administrative law concepts and doctrines are Judge made law‚ which have to be read in conjunction with any statute delegating power to a official‚ body or tribunal. OBJECTIVES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Since the Parliament grants the widest possible power and has little control over how these powers are exercised‚ the objectives of the administrative law are two fold. On one hand it has to protect the citizens from the abuse of power
Premium Law Administrative law
Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine LaToiya Beidleman Professor Augustine Weekley LEG 500 February 1‚ 2014 Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine In the late Nineteenth century‚ the majority of the United States implemented the employment-at-will policy. This common law was established to provide equal rights to the employee and the employer when it comes to terminating a position without prior notice. In many cases‚ employees are not hired based on contracts which give
Premium Employment Law United States
The 1967 referendum is about the aboriginals trying to be counted in Australias census. They are trying to change their rights and freedom. The aboriginals were treated unfairly during this time and was discriminated against. There are many aspects to the referendum including the lead up to it‚ the context on which it was presented‚ the referendum and finally the impact it has on the aboriginals. The 1967 referendum is about including Aboriginals people in the census and allowing the commonwealth
Premium Prime minister Constitution of Australia Constitution
Assignment 1: Employment-At-Will Doctrine Strayer University LEG 500: Law‚ Ethics‚ and Corporate Governance Prepared for: Dr. Boneita Campbell February 3‚ 2014 Introduction Employers adopt policies that are to be followed by employees ensuring the protection of all involved. Employment-at-will‚ the doctrine in American law is defined on the basis that the employment relationship can be terminated by either party with an advanced notice or even without one. Relationships
Premium Employment Law United States
Employment-At-Will Doctrine Professor Thomas Demko‚ Strayer University LEG500‚ Assignment 1 October 30‚ 2013 Assignment 1: Summary of Employment-At-Will Doctrine The famous philosopher James Allen inspired the society by his writings satisfactory performance to be rewarded with job security‚ in early 20th century. The US courts regarded relationship of employer and employee as being on equal footing for bargaining power. However‚ jobs were terminated
Premium Employment Law United States
Employment-at-Will Doctrine John Simpson Professor Steve Harris Law‚ Ethics and Corporate Governance November 6‚ 2014 1. Summarize the employment-at-will doctrine discussed in the text and then evaluate three (3) of the six (6) scenarios described by determining: a. Whether you can legally fire the employee; include an assessment of any pertinent exceptions to the employment-at-will doctrine. b. The primary action(s) that you should take to limit liability and impact on operations; specify
Premium Ethics Employment Business ethics
|Argued December 9‚ 1952 | |Reargued December 8‚ 1953 | |Decided May 17‚ 1954 | |Full case name |Oliver Brown‚ et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka‚ et | | |al. | |Citations |347 U.S. 483 (more) | |
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court of the United States