Transforming Logical Data Models into Physical Data Models Susan Dash Ralph Reilly IT610-1404A-01 According to an article written by Tom Haughey the process for transforming a logical data model into a physical data model is: The business authorization to proceed is received. Business requirements are gathered and represented in a logical data model which will completely represent the business data requirements and will be non-redundant. The logical model is then transformed into a first cut physical model
Premium Data modeling SQL Database
movement of the body. A concrete detail to recall is the difference between Kinesiology and its sub-division‚ Physical Activity. Since Kinesiology involves movement‚ most people misapprehend Kinesiology to be the study of physical activity. However‚ all physical activity is movement‚ but not to all movement is physical activity (Hoffman 2013). This paper is going to relate the significance of a physical activity I did in my life as well as the physical activity
Premium Psychology
designed. Database design has two parts. The first part is the logical design and the second part is the physical design. Logical Design The logical design is an abstract model which focus on what the system must do in order to meet the requirements of the organization’s needs. The logical design involves gathering the information about the business process‚ business entities‚ and organizational units (Unknown‚ 2001). The logical design is basically a blueprint that identifies the functions requirement
Premium The Real World Object-oriented programming Output
Also known as logical empiricism‚ rational empiricism or neo-positivism‚ logical positivism is the name given in 1931 by A.E Blumberg and Herbert Feigl to a set of philosophical ideas put forward by the Vienna Circle. This Vienna Circle was a group of early twentieth century philosophers who sought to re-conceptualize empiricism by means of their interpretation of then recent advances in the physical and formal sciences. Hence‚ the Vienna Circle represented a radical “anti-metaphysical” stance which
Premium Philosophy Empiricism
CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING This chapter contains the background of the study‚ statements of the problems‚ hypothesis‚ conceptual framework‚ and significance of the study. Background of the Study Experts said the results from two new reports‚ the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and the progress in International Reading Literacy Study are likely to fuel further debate‚ along with similar exams that test students at later ages‚ show a fundamental problem in America’s
Premium Sampling Sample Science
Jarboe I February 8‚ 2011 Logical Fallacies Before we can understand what a logical fallacy is‚ we establish some common background information for the purposes of accurate communication. There are two types of reasoning‚ inductive and deductive. The primary difference between the two is that inductive reasoning automatically allows for an appeal to probability‚ the assumption that what could happen will happen‚ while deductive reasoning considers this a logical fallacy. Thus for the purposes
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Deductive reasoning
Logical Fallacies Defined Abstract Fallacies can be viewed as a mistake or error. There are many different fallacies with different meanings for each. The following paper will discuss 9 logical fallacies. The paper will also include definitions for each of the 9 fallacies as well as examples of being applied to real life scenarios. Logical Fallacies defined Everyone has gotten into an argument with someone once or twice in their lifetime. Some people have mastered their skills in
Premium Argument Fallacy Critical thinking
argument is an argument in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support (Atheism Web). Fallacies of distraction attempt to distract from the falsity of an argument by the illegitimate use of logical operators (Stephen ’s Guide to Logical Fallacies). False Dilemma. In this fallacy‚ the distraction lies in the wording of the argument. It is worded so that we are only given two alternatives. One of which is sometimes so outrageous as to be unacceptable‚ while
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Argumentation theory
overcome by a person’s emotions‚ faulting in recognizing reason. Logical thinking is useful when a person wants to decide whether there is enough information to understand what has been offered. It is a thinking process when an individual use his or her way of thinking to arrive to a conclusion. A logical thinking problem calls for organization‚ for associations involving facts‚ and for a logic that “make sense”. Logical thinking is a skilled psychological process. An open question is expected
Premium Critical thinking Thought Reasoning
CRITICAL THINKING PSU LOGICAL FALLACIES Ad hominem or ATTACKING THE PERSON. Attacking the arguer rather than his/her argument. Example: John’s objections to capital punishment carry no weight since he is a convicted felon. Note: Saying something negative about someone is not automatically ad hominem. If a person (politician for example) is the issue‚ then it is not a fallacy to criticize him/her. Ad ignorantium or APPEAL TO IGNORANCE. Arguing on the basis of what is not known and cannot be
Premium Logic Logical fallacies Fallacy