SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Slide set 1 11 CS-Sec I & II Engr. Maria Shaikh Shaikh.maria@rocketmail.com Course Structure and Contact Info Schedule 4 Classes (Theory) Exams 2/26/2014 2 Sessional Tests Presentation Assignment Final Exams Engr. Maria Shaikh 2 Relevant Literature + Lecture Foils Sommerville I.‚ "Software Engineering"‚ 8th Edition or Latest‚ Pearson Education. Pressman R.S.‚ "Software Practitioner’s Approach”‚ 7th McGraw-Hill Inc.
Premium Software development process Software engineering
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE: 9th January‚ 2012 DATE: 9th January‚ 2012 CHAPTER 1 1.0. INTRODUCTION3 1.1 SUBJECT AND FIELD OF STUDY5 1.2 STUDY OBJECTIVES5 1.2.1 GLOBAL OBJECTIVES5 1.2.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES5 1.3 BACKGROUND OF STUDY6 1.4 SCOPE7 1.5 JUSTIFICATION7 1.6 METHODOLOGY8 1.7 EXPECTED RESULTS10 1.8 PRESENTATION OF THESIS10 1.9 STUDY WORK PLAN11 CHAPTER 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The power of information technology has been
Premium Poultry farming Mobile development Personal digital assistant
History of software engineering From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation‚ search This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2011) History of computing Hardware • Hardware before 1960 • Hardware 1960s to present • Hardware in Soviet Bloc countries Software • Software • Unix • Open-source software Computer science
Premium Software engineering
Table of Contents KANBAN IN SOFTWARE 6 ABSTRACT 6 Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Lean Thinking 8 1.2 Applying in Software Development 9 1.3 Kanban for Software 9 1.4 Scope of the study 11 Chapter 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1 Lean Manufacturing vs. Lean Development 11 2.2 Applying Lean in Software Development 12 2.3 Kanban 13 2.4 Waterfall methodology 16 Chapter 3: Methodology 19 Chapter 4: ANALYSIS 21 Chapter 5:- Findings 24 Chapter 6:- Conclusions
Premium Agile software development Kanban Software development process
HARVARD BUSINESSSCHOOL Software Associates Susan‚ I have just seen the quarterly P&L. It’s great that we exceeded our billed hours and revenue targets. But why‚ with higher revenues‚ is our bottom line less than half of what we had budgeted. Can we have a meeting tomorrow morning at 8 AM so you can explain this discrepancy to me? Richard Norton‚ CEO of Software Associates Norton‚ the founder and CEO of Software Associates called Susan Jenkins‚ CFO of Software Associates‚ after skimming
Premium Expense Revenue Income statement
much more… Software Engineering 2 Unit 1 syllabus • Introduction to Software Engineering : The evolving role of software‚ Changing Nature of Software‚ Software myths. • A Generic view of process : Software engineering- A layered technology‚ a process framework‚ The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)‚ Process patterns‚ process assessment‚ personal and team process models. 3 INDEX Unit-1 S.No Topic Lecture No PPTSlides Introduction to software Engineering:
Premium Capability Maturity Model Software engineering Software development process
Technology Syllabus CS66 OOAD LAB 0032 OBJECTIVE: To develop a mini-project following the 12 exercises listed below. 1. To develop a problem statement. 2. Develop an IEEE standard SRS document. Also develop risk management and project plan (Gantt chart). 3. Identify Use Cases and develop the Use Case model. 4. Identify the business activities and develop an UML Activity diagram. 5. Identity the conceptual classes and develop a domain model with UML Class diagram. 6. Using the identified
Premium Unified Modeling Language Requirements analysis Risk management
Strategies. In I. College‚ System Design & Architecture (p 3. Mall‚ R. (2000). Fundamentals of Software Engineering. In R. Mall‚ Software Life Cycle Mdels (p 4. Microsoft. (2013). Chapter 16: Quality Attributes. Retrieved from www.msdn.microsoft.com/: http://msdn.microsoft.com/enus/library/ee658094.aspx 5. Pressman‚ R. s. (2001). Software Engineering. New York: Thomas Cassan. 6. Sommerville‚ L. (2012). Software Engineering. New Delhi‚ India: Dorling Kindersley.
Premium Software engineering System software Requirements analysis
Life cycles in Software and Knowledge Engineering : a comparative review. Michael Wilson‚ David Duce Informatics Dept.‚ Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Dan Simpson Dept. of Computer Science‚ Brighton Polytechnic. ABSTRACT Developments in software engineering have led to models of the system life cycle incorporating the use of prototyping and formal methods of program verification. These are becoming supported by integrated project support environments and permit the planning and monitoring
Premium Software development Software engineering Software development process
information system This software based on user requirements in Egypt . softwares were evaluated based on checklist and through the observation in 8 hospitals according to defined criteria. However‚ Various systems has not efficiently met user expectations in all departments; medical records (74.5%)‚ pharmacy (58.6%)‚ laboratory (74.5%)‚ nursing (23.3%)‚ radiology (51.4%) and financial (65.4%). Minimum user requirements (29%) have been met. There was no software to meet the end users expectations
Premium Medical record Health care Computer software