difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires‚ to avoid self indulgence in evil desires‚ and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem. Socrates uses the image of a beast
Premium
This assertion implies that virtue cannot be innate because in order for something to be virtuous‚ it must be accompanied by wisdom‚ so it is a type of knowledge. However‚ in order to come to this conclusion‚ Socrates makes generalizations about all types of virtues‚ explaining that “all the qualities of the soul are in themselves neither beneficial or harmful‚ but accompanied by wisdom or folly they become harmful or beneficial” (78). I can easily disprove this
Premium Ethics Plato Philosophy
“For seeking and learning are in fact nothing but recollection.” (Socrates) I have never been a big fan of reincarnation‚ but I think it’s really interesting that how Socrates looked at it. I think it’s true that we knew the stuff that we know now from before. The brain is the most complicated organs in the body and doesn’t matter how much science improved and now we know about brain way much more‚ but still there’s a lot of mystery that we don’t know about it and recollection could be one of them
Premium Psychology Cognition Mind
Haþim Cihan Demirköprülü‚ 20303433 Essay Question: Compare the Characteristics of the true guardians‚ as described by Plato (Republic‚ bk VII‚ pp.158 – 61‚ 484b – 487e) with the characteristics of the rulers‚ as described by Machiavelli (The Prince‚ ch.15‚ pp. 47 – 49 and ch. 18‚ pp.54f). What is the most important difference between the two accounts? In your view‚ which account is better‚ and why? For centuries‚ every ruler created their own principles and rules and somehow
Premium Political philosophy Republic Virtue
)Compare Lao-tzu’s view of government with of Machiavelli in the next selection. Consider what seem to be the ultimate purposes of government‚ what seem to the obligations of the leader to the people being led‚ and what seems to be the main work of the state. What comparisons can you make between Lao-tzu’s Master and Machiavelli’s Prince. Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli
Premium Political philosophy
Latin word‚ virtus‚ originates from vir‚ meaning “man‚” and based upon this derivation‚ Machiavelli associates virtue with a definition more closely identified with manliness and a man’s ability to succeed. In Machiavelli’s The Prince‚ Machiavelli defines virtue to be the ability to achieve success by any means necessary‚ despite his lack of genuine ability to lead as a prince. To begin with‚ according to Machiavelli‚ virtue allows one to achieve success without complete dependence on fortune. “But to
Premium Political philosophy The Prince Florence
By definition‚ material monism is the philosophical belief that proclaims that the physical world is filled with all matter derived from one single element. Material monism is Pre-Socratic‚ which means that it originated prior to the teachings of Socrates. This belief system was developed by three famous Milesian philosophers‚ who are commonly known as Thales‚ Anaximander‚ and Anaximenes. As stated in the text‚ “Three philosophers from the city of Miletus in Ionia‚ Thales‚ Anaximander‚ and Anaximenes
Premium Materialism Metaphysics Philosophy
At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo‚ Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates‚ however‚ argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized‚ to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another‚ a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently‚ if the harmony
Premium Plato Philosophy Socrates
When are we justified in breaking the law? In the case of Socrates I believe him breaking the law was justifiable‚ although I don’t believe what he did was really breaking the law especially today in modern government. Today we are free with our speech‚ press and free to do what we want within limitations of laws. According to Mill “The only freedom which deserves the name‚ is that of pursuing our own good in our own way‚ so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs‚ or impede
Premium Law Martin Luther King, Jr. Rosa Parks
Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were two very important philosophers and political thinkers who attempted to understand human nature and how human nature affects political theory. In this paper I will compare and contrast the different methodologies Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes employed‚ and then analyze how this difference in methodology created a divergent view of human nature. I will then explain their differing views through the idea of self-interest. To compare and contrast Machiavelli
Premium Political philosophy Thomas Hobbes State of nature