"Compare and contrast utilitarianim and categorical imperative" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative What is a categorical imperative? A categorical imperative is a moral obligation which is absolute and necessary in any moral situation and isn’t reliant on a singular person’s desires or wills. For Kant‚ categorical imperatives are the foundation for morality because they invoke “pure” reasons for our moral actions and decisions since each rational being reasons to act outside of their own personal desires or will which may cloud judgments or impose a biased verdict

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s idea of hypothetical and categorical imperatives.

    Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    that needed the fever serum. We are going to look at this situation from Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative‚ Mills principle of Utilitarianism‚ the number principle‚ and my comparing it other scenarios discussed in class. Categorical Imperative‚ a term coined by Immanuel Kant‚ argues that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality. Immorality is a violation to the categorical imperative and is thereby irrational. Individuals that posses equal self worth deserve equal

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperative The basis of Categorical Imperative has dominated the study of human reasoning and morality. This idea behind Categorical Imperative can be described as the root principal or morality according to Immanuel Kant. Philosophers define human reasoning as a process of guidance of symbols and sentences‚ while morality is founded on the principles of right and wrong decisions that are accepted by an individual. Kant believed that the only thing of crucial moral worth is a good will

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    every rational mind follows through reasoning. He argues moral duties are generated by the moral law‚ which he distinguishes as two types of imperatives. An imperative is a conformity with a law and he argues that a “hypothetical imperative” plays no significant role in ones moral behaviour‚ as it causes an inclination in the person‚ whereas a “categorical imperative” is innate and occurs unconditionally as one is to do so without question. Kant states that the moral law is irrevocable and is not open

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the formulations of Kant’s categorical imperative: “Act only in agreement with that saw through which you can at the same time with that it become a universal law.” Philosophers argues that senses of the supreme principle of morality is an average of wisdom that can be styled the “categorical imperative”. Perhaps the strongest argument that philosophers gives for that claim relies on the claim that morality requires justification by the principle which means that all immoral actions are irrational

    Premium

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative and the Golden Rule Kant’s categorical imperative is to will without contradiction and is tested by universalizability. The golden rule is similar to this notion in that it is a universally moral principle that forces one to imagine both positions of an action. However‚ the two contrast more than they compare. The categorical imperative is an objective imperative‚ making one morally required to act according to it without exception. It addresses our maxims‚ the

    Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Logic

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Author‚ Immanuel Kant‚ in his article “The Good Will and the Categorical Imperative”‚ targeted mainly the idea of having a good will. What Kant meant by this exactly is that one must undergo good deeds for the sake of those deeds being good in and within themselves‚ not to gain any sort of award in return. Specifically‚ Kant argues that “[a] good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes‚ because of its fitness to attain some proposed end‚ but only because of its volition‚ that

    Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Categorical imperative

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    sacred imperatives to Kant’s philosophy. Kant believed that one should act only on the maxim through which you at the same time can will that it is a universal law. According to Kant‚ he believed that it is a formal duty for everyone to tell the truth even if it meant that it would put an individual at a disadvantage. Kant would further this by explaining that it would be wrong to lie even to a murderer who was trying to locate their victim‚ because it would breach his Categorical Imperative for truthfulness

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Ethics

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain the first formulation of the Categorical Imperative The first formulation of the categorical imperative states; “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it would become a universal law.” Kant invented a phrase‚ “categorical imperative‚” that makes the above point in a different way. He distinguishes “the categorical imperative” from so-called “hypothetical imperatives.” A hypothetical imperative is a directive to the effect that if you wish to

    Premium Morality Categorical imperative

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50