"Compare and contrast utilitarianim and categorical imperative" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 3 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    came up with a set of imperatives (commands or advice) for one to follow. His imperatives consist of Hypothetical and Categorical. Hypothetical imperatives consist of problematic imperatives and assertoric imperatives‚ which hypothetical imperatives say that an action is only good for some purpose. An example of a Categorical Imperative is apodeictic. Categorical imperative is a single moral command that has no other purpose or without any other end. A problematic imperative tells you how to achieve

    Premium Morality Ethics Human

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    moral and what is immoral” (Robert Paul Wolf Pg 265). Donna concludes that health care should be a human right that is the moral thing to do for the society. A philosopher that agrees with this point is Immanuel Kant with the theory of the Categorical Imperative. Version 1 “Act in such a way that you always treat humanity‚ whether in your own person or that of another‚ never simply as means‚ but always at the same time as an end” (Prof Culbertson). Kant agrees with health care being a right as this

    Premium Health care Health economics Medicine

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality‚ the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy‚ illuminate Kant’s first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent‚ they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis‚ the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered‚ is a large distinction

    Premium Morality Ethics Immanuel Kant

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Summary Immanuel Kant - “The moral law” First‚ Kant presupposes that there is a moral law.  That is‚ there exists some basis for morality beyond subjective description of it.  He then begins with a series of identifications to answer how the moral law possibly gives a pure abstract form of a moral law that will ask if it is really moral.  He says the only good thing that exists without qualifications is a good will (or good intentions).  Other things may bring goodness‚ but always with qualifications

    Premium Morality Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. “The imperative thus says which action possible by me would be good‚ and represents the practical rule in relation to a will that does not at once do an action just because it is good‚ party because the subject does not always know that it is good‚ party because‚ even if he knew this‚ his maxims could still be opposed to the objective principles of practical reason” (4:414). Kant’s categorical imperative states that our actions should be in accord with universal good and not driven by any personal

    Premium Immanuel Kant Categorical imperative Philosophy

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    right that reasoning can achieve. Why should something that claims to be all knowing create a sort of commandments if that being knows that not all humans will follow those codes of conduct? A part of Kant’s theory that intrigues me is his categorical imperative‚ and the two well know formulations of it. The first formulation basically states that any action that takes place should only happen if it can become a universal law. If the action becomes a universal law and it leads to a logical contradiction

    Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    by Immanuel Kant‚ Kant proposes a very significant discussion of imperatives as expressed by what one “ought” to do. He implies this notion by providing the audience with two kinds of imperatives: categorical and hypothetical. The discussion Kant proposes is designed to formulate the expression of one’s action. By distinguishing the difference between categorical and hypothetical imperatives‚ Kant’s argues that categorical imperatives apply moral conduct in relation to performing one’s duty within

    Premium Categorical imperative Immanuel Kant Morality

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    deontological type of morals‚ which permits people to be self-governing. Inside of this hypothesis there are two sorts of imperatives; the hypothetical imperative that charges that assign certain activities to accomplish certain finishes (Pollock‚ 2013‚ p. 34). For instance‚ in the event that you need a pet‚ then you must show obligation. By difference‚ a categorical imperative summons activity that is essential with no reference to planned purposes or outcomes. For instance‚ act just as per reasons

    Premium

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imperatives in general are commands that dictate a particular course of action‚ such as "you shall clean your room." Hypothetical Imperatives are commands that depend on my preference for a particular end‚ and are stated in conditional form. The Categorical Imperative‚ Kant argues‚ are moral actions based on a "supreme principle of morality" which is objective‚ rational‚ freely chosen‚ and it is not conditional upon one’s preferences. Therefore the Categorical Imperative can be the only

    Premium Metaphysics Immanuel Kant Germany

    • 3187 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Explain Kant’s Categorical Imperative The Categorical Imperative was a deontological‚ absolute‚ normative and secular theory put forward by Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. Kant’s theory was deontological which means that it judges morality based on a person’s action rather than the outcome‚ it is also secular‚ this means that ‚ even though Kant is religious‚ his theory is not‚ his theory is judgemental which means the theory is normative and it is also absolute which means that Kant believes

    Premium Immanuel Kant Morality Ethics

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50