CASE BRIEF Title of Case: Stoneridge Investment Partners‚ LLC‚ Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta‚ Inc.‚ et al. 128 S. Ct. 761 (2008) Facts: The plaintiff‚ Stoneridge Investment Partners‚ LLC‚ presented a securities fraud class action against the defendant‚ Charter Communications’ vendors‚ Scientific-Atlanta. Charter communications is a publicly traded cable company that services millions of customers throughout America. Charter contracts with vendors for equipment that is used for their company
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
Case Brief Summary: Marbury v. Madison Robert L. Broadwater PAD 525 Strayer University Dr. O’Neal July 09‚ 2012 Summary of Marbury v. Madison‚ 5 U.S. 137‚ 1 Cranch 137‚ 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803). Facts The incumbent president Federalist John Adams was defeat in the presidential election by Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson. The day before leaving office‚ President John Adams named forty-two justices of the peace and sixteen new circuit court justices for the District of Columbia. This was
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Marbury v. Madison United States Constitution
Eli Kutler Media Law Professor Thomas Brief #1 Employment Division v. Smith FACTS: Alfred Smith and Galen Black were fired from a drug and alcohol treatment agency where they worked as counselors for admitting they used peyote‚ which is an illegal drug‚ for the use of “religious ceremonies.” The use of illegal drugs violates the agencies policy and according to the agency‚ were grounds for “immediate termination from employment.” Smith and Black were denied from unemployment benefits
Premium United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
employees bring new blood into the organization. This results in more innovative and creative ideas.” Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your response. Although there is enough data available to validate arguments made from both sides. One can presume that depending on which side of the gate debaters find themselves‚ it is more likely that their point of view will be biased. However it may be worthy to note that though external employees can indeed bring “new blood” to the organization
Premium Employment
remembered. This day‚ also known as V-J Day‚ occurred on August 14th‚ 1945 but is still celebrated on the next day‚ August 15th. When Japan surrendered‚ shouts of joy were heard all across the United States as President Truman announced that war between Japan and America were finally coming to an end. Alfred Eisenstaedt‚ photographer hired by LIFE magazine‚ was walking the streets of Times Square in New York City the day America was informed that Japan had surrendered (V-J Day in Times Square 1). Celebrating
Premium New York City World War II United States
Case Brief Saenz v Roe (1999) 1. Facts The facts of the Saenz V Roe case is that in 1992 the state of California wanted to change the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program by setting a limit to new residents. By having this approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and having the Federal District Court implement it‚ there would a large number of new residents who would be treated unequally. By the time it became into law on April 1‚ 1997 a class action was filed to challenge
Premium United States Law Supreme Court of the United States
To understand the controversy that Billie presented one must first go to the root or source of such controversy and examine Billie’s childhood. Billie was born Eleanora Harris to her father Clarence Holiday and mother Sadie Fagan who were just fifteen and thirteen years old‚ respectively‚ at the time (A 91). Born between 1912 and 1915 in Baltimore‚ the date unsure‚ Billie grew up without her father‚ who moved away early on in her life. Billie and her mother used to fight a lot‚ when her mother
Premium Family
documentation. Finally‚ requiring a person to produce certain documents is unfair to foreign nationals‚ Native Americans‚ victims of domestic violence‚ the homeless‚ the elderly‚ military personnel and victims of natural disasters. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) response was the REAL ID Act does not have
Premium United States Immigration to the United States Immigration
invitation to treat. Then advise will be given to Terri in respects to ‘offer and acceptance’ and ‘invitation to treat’ with the help of case studies. Section two discusses employment law‚ discrimination law and unfair dismissal. The author will then advise Jane on how she should proceed Section three discusses unregistered community law with the help of a case study and then advises Tony. Section 4 discusses undue influence and the Family home Act 1976 and the author will advise Michael on how
Premium Marketing Marketing mix Management
Case Brief Funk vs. United States Supreme Court of the United States 290 U.S. 371‚ 54 S. Ct. 212 (1933) Facts: Funk was tried twice and convicted both times in Federal District Court for conspiracy to violate the prohibition law. In the first appeal to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals the decision of the Federal District Court was reversed due to issues not applicable here. 46 F.2d 417. In both trials the defendant called upon his wife to testify on his behalf and she was excluded
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States