Regarding the case of C. Elvin Feltner‚ Jr. v Columbia Pictures Television‚ Inc.‚ Columbia Pictures accused Feltner of owing royalty payments for showing programs after the license to do so was revoked ("Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television‚ Inc. 523 U.S. 340 (1998)"‚ 1998). Columbia Pictures tried to resolve the debt owed by Feltner‚ owner of Krypton International Corporation‚ outside of court but negotiations failed and Columbia Pictures terminated their license agreement. Feltner’s television
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
In 1991‚ Columbia Pictures terminated an agreement with C. Elvin Feltner‚ the owner of several television stations. The agreement originally stated that Feltner could broadcast episodes of "Who’s The Boss‚" "Hart to Hart‚" "T.J. Hooker" and "Silver Spoons"‚ however Feltner was late on payments‚ so they canceled the contract. 19 months later‚ Feltner was still broadcasting the shows‚ even after Columbia Pictures repeatedly told them to stop. Columbia Pictures sued them for copyright infringement
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Jury
case 1: Columbia industries 1.Who are the key members of the buying center at Columbia industries‚ and who will most likely have the most influence on the purchase decision. It was Mr. West who was charged with the responsibility of searching for seven new lift trucks which were going to be best suited for the company. This process had to however pass through the purchasing agents who were required to examine all of the qualifications who finally settled on just five brands. The quotation to
Premium Sales Truck
Jerrica Langlais June 22‚ 2013 Human Resource Law Burlington Industries Inc v Ellerth Introduction In the last two years there has been 11‚364 sexual harassment claims filed according to the EEOC‚ it has been decreasing in the last 4 years but it was at a all time high in 1997. While working for Burlington Industries for 15 months‚ Kimberly B. Ellerth quit because she allegedly suffered sexual harassment by her supervisor Ted Slowik. Kimberly refused all of Slowik’s advances and did
Premium Employment Harassment Pleading
Running head: Terry v. Ohio‚ 392 U.S. 1 Case Brief of Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 October 4‚ 2014 Facts At approximately 2:30 in the afternoon‚ while patrolling a downtown beat in plain clothes‚ Detective McFadden observed two men (later identified as Terry and Chilton) standing on a street corner. The two men walked back and forth an identical route a total of 24 times‚ pausing to stare inside a store window. After the completion of walking the route‚ the two men would
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Terry v. Ohio
Case Study: Columbia Company Evaluate the two methods identified- predetermined rate versus actual cost- that the firm could use to charge the individual stores the costs of Columbia Company’s new collections department in terms of (1.) Practicality of application and ease of use (2.) cost control. Also‚ indicate whether a centralized or decentralized organization structure would be more conducive for each charging method. Predetermined rates are used in applying overhead costs to products or
Premium Cost
November 29‚ 2014 District of Colombia v. Heller The District of Columbia had a law banning all handguns. Dick Heller challenged this law in 2008‚ on the grounds of the Second Amendment. This was the first time that the Supreme Court had regarded what it meant for an individual’s right to possess weapons for private uses‚ including self-defense. The District of Columbia had banned handguns‚ making it a place with one of the strictest gun laws. The District of Columbia also had a law that entailed for
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Second Amendment to the United States Constitution District of Columbia v. Heller
the Gun Nut’s post on Thomhartmann.com. In the District of Columbia v. Heller case‚ gun control was the purpose problem. The case resulted in protecting the “Second Amendment of an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes‚ such as self-defense within the home‚...” in which was a 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court. According to statelaws.findlaw.com‚ the District of Columbia does not allow open carry of a firearm. My definition of
Premium
Brief Kraft‚ Inc. v. Federal Trade Commissio Plaintiff/Appellant: Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Defendant/Appellee: Kraft Inc. History: Federal Trade Commission instituted a deceptive advertising proceeding against Kraft Inc. Kraft was instructed to terminate certain ads due to false advertising. Facts: In March 1987‚ Kraft added a subscript on the television commercial and as a footnote in the print media version‚ the disclosure that “one ¾ ounces slice has 70% of the calcium of five ounces
Premium Marketing Kraft Foods United States
CASE BRIEF FOR THE WINDSOR V. STATE OF ALABAMA WINDSOR V. STATE OF ALABAMA 683 So. 2d 1021 (1994) Judicial History: Harvey Lee Windsor was convicted of capital murder under § 13-A-5-40 (a)(2)‚ Code of Alabama 1975. The jury unanimously recommended the death penalty and the trial court accepted the jury’s recommendation and sentenced the appellant to death by electrocution. Windsor then appealed the conviction and sentence to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Facts: Harvey Lee Windsor and Lavon Gunthrie
Premium Court Jury Supreme Court of the United States