TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN COLLEGE SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY DIPLOMA IN TECHNOLOGY (QUANTITY SURVEYING) YEAR 2 ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013 ATGB3663 BUILDING ACTS AND CONTRACTS PROGRAMME : DQS2 GROUP : A LECTURER/ TUTOR : MR IVAN KWAY EU WAN Team Member | Student ID | Alaster Ang Han Wun | 11wtd01029 | Chan Siang Leen | 11wtd04062 | Chan Sze Haw | 11wtd05409 | Chan Yew Jia | 11wtd01905 | Chong Hong Seng | 11wtd05935 | Table of Contents A) Clause 39 (1)‚ (3)‚ (4) 3 B)
Premium Orders of magnitude Residential area Residential development
or is carrying on business? 2. Whether the remuneration received from the Mills is on account of service or is the remuneration for business? ANALYSIS OF THE FACTS: 1. The appellants were registered as a private limited company having their registered office in Bombay and the objects for which they were incorporated were the following : To act as agents for Governments or Authorities or for any bankers‚ manufactures merchants‚ shippers‚ Joint Stock Companies and others and carry on all kinds
Premium Contract Agency
Asif Tufal Contract-Law-page CASES ON FORMATION OF A CONTRACT OFFER Payne v Cave (1789) The defendant made the highest bid for the plaintiff’s goods at an auction sale‚ but he withdrew his bid before the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. It was held that the defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at any time before the auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer. Note: The common law rule laid down in
Premium Contract
Case name Case facts What it links to Rookes V Barnard Rookes sued the union officials‚ including Mr Barnard‚ the branch chairman. Rookes said that he was the victim of a tortious intimidation that had used unlawful means to induce BOAC to terminate his contract. The strike was alleged to be the unlawful means. -The case was almost immediately reversed Miliangos V George Frank Textiles George Frank Ltd was a Swiss textile producer who sold and delivered textiles to Miliangos‚ textile
Premium Case law Stare decisis Ratio decidendi
Acceptance in Making Business Contracts Dr. Md. Abdul Jalil Associate Professor of Law Department of Business Administration‚ Faculty of Economics and Management International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) E-mail: abduljalil@iiu.edu.my‚ abd_jalil2@yahoo.com Abstract Business firms and Business corporations enter into thousands of contracts everyday. Making a formal and written contract is very important for business corporations and firms although oral contracts are accepted and recognized by
Premium Contract
Principles of Contract The law of contracts touches equally upon the lives of ordinary persons and the activities of small and big business. This branch of law deals with law relating to promises‚ their formation‚ performance and enforceability. It is scattered over several legislations. There are special legislations dealing with particular contractual relationships‚ e.g. The Sale of Goods Act‚ 1930‚ The Partnership Act‚ 1932. This paper will include a study of general principles of contracts spelt out
Premium Contract Contract law
Chapter 2 : The Indian Contract Act 1872 Definition Sir Frederic Pollock - “Every agreement and promise enforceable at law” According to Sec 2(h) “An agreement enforceable by law Agreement – Every promises and set of promises forming consideration for each other. Essential Elements of Valid Contract Minimum Two Parties – one party has to make an offer and other must accept it. Offer & Acceptance – There must be an offer and acceptance to the offer‚ resulting into an agreement. It should
Premium Contract Contract law
no excuse. Introduction to Indian Contract Act Definition of a Contract :- Sec. 2(h) of the Act defines the term contract as "An agreement enforceable by law is a contract”. Flow of the definition :- Contract Agreement Promise Accepted proposal Proposal/offer Contract as defined by Eminent Justists :- 1. “Every agreement and promise enforceable at law is a contract.” – Pollock 2. “A Contract is an agreement between two or more persons
Premium Contract Contract law
it comes to deciding on case‚ judges do not decide solely on their own. They are bound to follow certain accepted principles which are commonly known as “the doctrine of binding precedent”. The doctrine of binding precedent required that “like cases decided alike”. If a case now before the court has facts and raises issues similar to those of a previously decided case‚ then the present case will be decided in the same way as the earlier one. In this way‚ the earlier case‚ referred to as ‘a precedent’
Premium Contract
Indian Contract Act 1872 Indian Contract Act 1872 is the main source of law regulating contracts in Indian law‚ as subsequently amended. It determines the circumstances in which promise made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding on them. All of us enter into a number of contracts everyday knowingly or unknowingly. Each contract creates some right and duties upon the contracting parties. Indian contract deals with the enforcement of these rights and duties upon the parties. The
Premium Contract Contract law