Journal of Management and Business Research Consumer Preference Coca Cola versus Pepsi-Cola By Abdul Munam Jamil Paracha‚ Muhammad Waqas‚ Ali Raza Khan & Sohaib Ahmad University of Lahore‚ Pakistan. Abstract - This study is conducted between two global giants Coca Cola & Pepsi-cola. This research paper is basically a comparative study of two well known competitors in beverage industry of Pakistan which are Pepsi Cola & Coca Cola. The primary purpose of this paper is to find out which company
Premium Coca-Cola
References: Delany.D. (2012). Reasons Why Coke Is Better Than Pepsi. Retrieved February 18‚ 2013‚ from http://www.ehow.com/info_8121864_reasons-coke-better-pepsi.html#ixzz2LMKm6jHF Anonymous. (2001). The coca cola company. Retrieved February 20‚ 2013‚ from http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_people_drink_coca_cola Anonymous. (2011). Coke struggles hard to meet standards‚ Retrieved 19 February‚ 2013‚ from http://www.coca-cola.com.pk/pages/landing/index
Premium Coca-Cola
Pepsi vs Coca Cola For more than a century‚ Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics‚ strategies such as blind taste tests‚ and reward initiatives for the consumer‚ they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business‚ “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo‚ Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want‚ whether it
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
business dealings in India are not their most long held nor the least problematic. Pepsico has the most longevity in Indian operations having started there in 1988. This allowed Pepsico to establish a stronghold in the Indian market prior to Coca-Cola’s entry in 1993. Both of these MNCs experienced difficulty in establishing their companies‚ and while they have made some great headway they have also experienced some extreme business angst along the way. Issue/Problem Identification Facts and Assumptions
Premium Stakeholder analysis Stakeholder Multinational corporation
Barriers to market entry include a number of different factors that restrict the ability of new competitors to enter and begin operating in a given industry. For example‚ an industry may require new entrants to make large investments in capital equipment‚ or existing firms may have earned strong customer loyalties that may be difficult for new entrants to overcome. The ease of entry into an industry in just one aspect of an industry analysis; the others include the power held by suppliers and buyers
Premium Barriers to entry Switching barriers
how barriers to entry may affect market structure In some market it is easier to enter than in others due to the barriers to enter. Those barriers determine how many producers there will be in a market and therefore its structure. If there are lot of barriers to entry there will be market structure such as monopoly or oligopoly; if there are no barriers to entry‚ or just few of them‚ there will be market structure such as perfect competition or monopolistic competition. When the barriers to entry
Free Economics Perfect competition Monopoly
Definitions. Barriers to entry are economic‚ procedural‚ regulatory‚ or technological factors that obstruct or restrict entry of new firms into an industry or market. Barriers to exit are perceived or real impediments that keep a firm from quitting uncompetitive markets or from discontinuing a low-profit product. 2. Types of barriers: Innocent barriers are those that are part and parcel of the nature of the industry and have not been specially erected by the incumbents to hinder the entry of other
Premium Barriers to entry Cost Costs
Coke v. Pepsi – 5 Forces Analysis Industry concentrate produces High intensity (depends on price/advertising cost/ high number of substitutes(low calorie drinks/no carb drinks/ not carbonated drinks like orange juice) Pepsi products /Coke products New Entrants (barriers/rivalry) High Intensity-Brand recognition dominant market/ patents on style and colors Network relationships & high cost of entry established such as distribution‚ warehouse‚ bottlers‚ and shelf-location high marketing
Premium Coca-Cola Cola
Case #14 Coke vs. Pepsi‚ 2001 Synopsis and Objectives Set in December 2000‚ immediately after the merger announcement between PepsiCo‚ Inc.‚ and the Quaker Oats Company‚ this case asks to examine the implications of the merger for the rivalry between the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo and for value creation by each firm. Because the merger would allow PepsiCo to control Gatorade‚ which held an 83% share in the sports-drink market‚ PepsiCo would further strengthen its already wide lead
Premium Rate of return Coca-Cola Gatorade
Cory Wells Coke and Pepsi Case Coke and Pepsi have been long time rivals with competition being the name of the game in their industry. Historically‚ the soft drink industry has been so profitable because Americans tend to love soft drinks‚ more than any other beverages out there. Americans soda consumption grew by an average of 3% a year since 1970. Coke and Pepsi had an average annual growth of 10% from 1975 to 1995. Not to mention‚ the internal rivalry
Premium Soft drink Coca-Cola