Case Study – Babybelle While observing the judge’s legal reasoning in this particular case‚ I could say that ”Ratio decidendi” depends on the current facts emphasized in the case and that “Obiter dicta’s” concept presents conclusions based on hypothetical situations. - The major legal issues The legal issues in this particular case are relied on the ASIC Act where a person becomes automatically disqualified from managing a corporation if the person is convicted of an offence that “involves dishonesty”
Premium Corporation Law Appeal
Dawn Montgomery BUSI Law 2301 NT February 15‚ 2013 Case Study #1 I. FACTS: Helen‚ age 17‚ falsely presented an identification card showing her age as 22 to a motorcycle dealer. She persuaded him to sell her a motorcycle on credit because she did not have the money to pay cash. Helen drove the motorcycle away and a few days later‚ returned it to the dealer stating that she voided the contract. The dealer states that she cannot void the contract because (a) she had misrepresented her age
Premium Contract
Zulfatah Arif SCM-019741 Work Psychology in Communication‚ Writing and Reporting COM 2153 Mr Haji Adenan Case Studies An Unmotivated Building Inspector Case Study By: Zulfatah Arif 1) Review the motivation theories discussed in this chapter. How would each one describe and explain the problems with Simon Lucas’s motivation? The theories that would be relevant to the problems with Simon Lucas’ motivation would be the McClelland’s Need Theory and Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory.
Premium Motivation Management Scientific method
TO: Jackson Jones FROM: Yaneth Eugenio DATE: June 25. 2013 RE: Your case request Dear Jackson Jones‚ Thank you for your visit to our law firm last week. I have reviewed your case and the laws and cases it relates. Based on my analysis our firm has decided not to take your case. Your conduct was intolerable and the principal had all the rights to expel you due to the fact that you were on school property. Now if you were off school property and the principal saw you else where he would have
Premium Law First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech
a memorandum addressing the following matters in detail‚ and including relevant case law to support your arguments: What are Buyer ’s potential claims against Seller? What are Seller ’s potential defences? Who is likely to prevail in the event this case goes to court? Assume Buyer prevails in his lawsuit against Seller. What damages is Buyer likely to receive from the court? SUMMARY AND RELEVANT FACTS In this case Buyer is plaintiff whereas Seller is defendant. October 1: Buyer saw courier
Premium Contract Breach of contract Law
Facts of Solomon v Solomon Solomon was a leather merchant who converted his business into a Limited Company as Solomon & Co. limited (the ‘company’). The company so formed consisted on Solomon‚ his wife and five of his children as members. The company purchased the business of Solomon for £39‚000; the purchase consideration was paid in terms of £10‚000 debentures conferring a charge over the company’s assets‚ £20‚000 in fully paid‚ £1 share each and the balance in cash. The company in less than
Premium Corporation Limited liability
Mr Shafron was not a member. Finally‚ Mr Shafron argued that if he was an officer (on either basis)‚ he had‚ in any event‚ not breached his duties in relation to either the ASX issue or the actuarial issue. 2. RELEVANT LAW FOR DECISION MAKING The relevant law relied on by the judge in making the decision was under section 180(1) of the Corporations Act which provides that directors and other officers of a corporation must exercise the powers and duties provided to them with the degree
Premium Corporation Appeal Decision making
Case Study 1 Ebbers vs. Central Apartments Ltd. In this case Central Apartments Ltd has borrowed $800‚000 from exchange bank and secured the loan by a five year mortgage on the apartment building. Since the bank required additional security the president of the corporation at the time named Ebbers personally signed the guarantee. This makes Ebbers the guarantor and responsible for the debt if the principle debtor‚ Central Apartments Ltd‚ should default in the payment of their debt. Ebbers who
Premium Money Debt Loan
neutral third party or panel of experts hears a dispute and imposes a resolution of the parties” (Miller & Jentz‚ 2008‚ p.50). However‚ both parties must sign and agree to the above statement for it to be acknowledged as a legal judgment. In the case of Thomas Baker and Osborne Development Corporation it gets a little bit more involved. For starters‚ Osborne Development purchased the home warranty program administered by Home Buyers Warranty and signed the agreement of arbitration with them.
Premium Appeal Arbitration Dispute resolution
Legal Issues in Management Final Case Study Christine Stout Southern Oregon University Business law – case study The case study of John and Stacey has so many complicated elements that apparently all the stakeholders involved apart from the two mentioned could sue or be sued against. This paper assumes that this is the scenario for this paper. The characters involved are John and Stacy‚ a restaurant owner‚ the owner of a townhouse‚ the owner of the mink on which John tripped and subsequently
Premium Contract Law