Preview

Law Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2478 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Case Study
Facts of Solomon v Solomon

Solomon was a leather merchant who converted his business into a Limited Company as Solomon & Co. limited (the ‘company’). The company so formed consisted on Solomon, his wife and five of his children as members. The company purchased the business of Solomon for £39,000; the purchase consideration was paid in terms of £10,000 debentures conferring a charge over the company’s assets, £20,000 in fully paid, £1 share each and the balance in cash.
The company in less than one year ran into difficulties and liquidation proceedings commenced. The assets of the company were not even sufficient to discharge the debentures (held entirely by Solomon himself). And nothing was left for unsecured creditors. The liquidator on behalf of unsecured creditors alleged that the company was a sham and mere a-lias or agent for Salomon.
Court of Appeal:
The British Court of Appeal considered the matter and Kay LJ stated that
“The statue was intended to allow seven or more persons, bona fide associated for the purpose of trade to limit their liability, under certain conditions and to become a corporation. But shareholders of Salomon & Co Ltd. we’re not intended to legalize the pretended association for the purpose of enabling an individual to carry on his business within; limited liability in the name of joint stock company.”

Thus, the focus of court of appeal was that the six family members never intended to take part in the business and only held the shares to fulfill the technicality required by the companies act.
House of Lords:
Lord Macnaghten held that ‘the company is different person altogether from subscribers… and, though it may be that after incorporation the business is precisely the same as it was before and same persons are managers, and same hand receive the profit, the company is not agent for subscriber or trustee for them. Nor are the subscribers as member liable, in any shape or form, except to the extent and manner prescribed by the Act.’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2 This is an OPEN book examination. You can only use your prescribed text book and the Corporations Act 2001. No other materials are allowed.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Studies Case Studies

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thank you for your visit to our law firm last week. I have reviewed your case and the laws and cases it relates. Based on my analysis our firm has decided not to take your case. Your conduct was intolerable and the principal had all the rights to expel you due to the fact that you were on school property. Now if you were off school property and the principal saw you else where he would have had no say.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tax Court noticed that the sole purpose of MBA’s organization was to integrate Michael’s sole proprietorship and that the conjoined relationship between the MBA’s organization and the transfer of the sole proprietorship’s assets weighed in favor of finding that the transfer was a capital contribution. This was particularly so, the court said, in the light of the lack of evidence of a business purpose of the…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cases

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages

    ‘…clear evidence that he had been either the sole person directing the affairs of the company [or acting with others all equally lacking in a valid appointment…) or, if there were others who were true directors, that he was acting on an equal footing with the others in directing the affairs of the company’ Timothy Lloyd, QC, at p 524.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Applying this doctrine to the case study, Alicia can be regarded as one of the promoters of Batco Ltd, since she had involved in the formation of the company and ranked as one of the three directors after the registration. It’s also noticeable that the other two directors, Adam and Robin, were former employees of Alicia. Thus, even though Alicia didn’t play an active role in the formation of the company, the connection between her and Batco before and after the registration was solid.…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Question- Critically discuss the principles of separate corporate personality and limited liability in relation to companies. Introduction- Overview of Separate Corporate Personality and Limited Liability This principle of a separate corporate personality has a long-standing concept which can be found before the landmark case of the Salomon v Salomon Co Ltd, although it typically is related with the decision. As a result, the case has been defined as a decision that demonstrated and clearly outlined the concept of separate corporate personality, that is grounded the notion that the company is at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum. This corporate veil is therefore a mechanism which separates a company from its members. It grants limited liability to the companys shareholders, allows the company to acquire profits and suffer losses, enter into contracts and properties as a separate entity. The principle of separate corporate personality is now defined as a unyielding rock that has been concretised in the section 16(2) of Companies Act 2006. Limited liability, as a result of the separate and different corporate personality, has the foundation of the modern corporation and hence the company law. Limited liability is deemed necessary because it promotes commerce and industrial growth. It is still recognised that this distinction between respective legal personalities, rights and the liabilities of a company and those of its shareholders is still as valid today as it was when the House of Lords had decidedin Salomon. However, despite (or perhaps because of) the important, overarching nature of separate corporate personality, a number of exceptions have been developed allowing the corporate veil, in certain situations, to be set aside or pierced. This therefore means that the separate corporate personality is not absolute different to the statutory and the common laws justification which has indeed developed to uplift…

    • 3356 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiduciary and Promoter

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Legal status – Statutory provisions are silent, except for certain sections in Specific Relief Act, 1963…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The idea of an independent corporation governed by directors and accountable to shareholders, was a brilliant one. It permitted people to raise capital from the public, to invest it without, in most cases, a danger of personal risk and to engage in entrepreneur activity which, otherwise, would probably not occur”.…

    • 2898 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    salomon

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the time the legal requirement for incorporation was that at least seven persons subscribe as members of a company i.e. as shareholders. Mr. Salomon himself was managing director. Mr. Salomon owned 20,001 of the company's 20,007 shares - the remaining six were shared individually between the other six shareholders (wife, daughter and four sons). Mr. Salomon sold his business to the new corporation for almost £39,000, of which £10,000 was a debt to him. He was thus simultaneously the company's principal shareholder and its principal creditor…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fybms Law Notes

    • 30683 Words
    • 123 Pages

    Section 3(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “An association of individuals form for some purpose and registered under the present Companies Act or an earlier Indian Companies Act.” The following are the essential features of a company 1) Separate Legal Entity - A company on registration has a separate identity of its own which is different and distinct from the members who constitute it. This principle of independent corporate personality was laid down in the case of Salomon vs. Salomon & Co. Ltd. In this case Mr. Salomon was carrying on shoe manufacturing business on proprietorship basis. He sold his business to a company Salomon & Co. Ltd. for 30,000 pounds. Salomon received consideration in the form of shares for 20,000 pounds of one pound each and got debentures worth 10,000 pounds. The company had seven members, consisting of Mr. Salomon, Mrs. Salomon, four sons and a daughter. All the other members of the company had only one share each. After sometime the company had to be wound up on account of financial difficulties. The assets realized were 6,000 pounds while the liabilities were 10,000 pounds to Salomon as a secured creditor and 7,000 pounds to outsiders who were unsecured creditors. The creditors claim priorities over Salomon (Secured Creditor) on the ground that Salomon and Salomon & Co. were one and the same. It was however, observed that the company on incorporation has a different personality different from the subscribers. Therefore the identity of the subscriber is immaterial. Hence Mr. Salomon was paid first as he was a secured creditor. 2) Limited Liability – The liability of the shareholders is limited to the face value of the shares held by them. Once the full amount of the shares is paid, they cannot be called upon to bare the loss from there personal property. 3) Artificial Legal Person – Company on…

    • 30683 Words
    • 123 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is of interest to note that the UK’s Companies Act 1948 which our very own Act is based on has undergone considerable changes. This same law has been discarded in most commonwealth countries. In UK, the changes have culminated into the enactment of the Companies Act of 2006.In Nyali Limited v. Attorney General2, it was Lord Denning’s view that:…

    • 2174 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 2763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Malaysia, the Companies Act 1965 (CA1965) is the main legislation leading the formation and operation of businesses. This Act permits to a group of people to form several types of corporate organization called as registered companies. Furthermore, this Act also offers services for the incorporation of companies such as regulation, formation of relationship between members and creditors, management and closing down of the company. Registrar of Companies (ROC) executes and manages control of the CA1965. Before starting a business, each of the companies must register with ROC. On the other hand, the Companies Act 2006 is the act that governing the establishment and running of companies in UK. This Act is revised to help people understand the law governing companies. It also enhances the shareholders engagement as well as it enables the directors of the companies to start up a business and reduce the burden of legislation.…

    • 2763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Company Law

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss and explain the concept of the company as a separate legal entity. In your answer,…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law Notes

    • 28895 Words
    • 116 Pages

    COMPANY LAW – EXAM NOTES Incorporation and Its Effects S117 - All companies must register with ASIC S118 – All companies must have a Number S119 – Once the company is registered with ASIC, the company has a separate legal existence. Separate Legal Entity The separate legal entity notion is shown in Salomon v Salomon where a company shareholder is limited to the amount of share capital they have contributed and they can not be held personally liable for the dealings of the company. This notion of separate legal entity is shown in several cases: Lee v Lee’s Air Farming – The company can enter into contracts with a shareholder as an employee and it is bound because the company is a separate legal entity, distinct from its owner. Macaura v Northern Assurance – Macaura had insured timber in his own name and didn’t transfer the insurance policy to the company, that was formed to mill and fell timber. When timber burned he couldn’t make an insurance claim because the company was a separate legal entity. Industrial Equity v Blackburn – A holding company treated a subsidiary’s profits as if it was its own and went to pay dividends out of those profits. Court held each separate company was a separate legal entity and therefore this approach was invalid. Piercing the Corporate Veil There is however the notion of piercing the corporate vale with holds the directors personally liable for the debts of the company. This only applies to the directors of the company and not the shareholders. Under S588G of the Corporations Act, directors of a company are personally liable for any insolvent trading that the corporation has entered into. This liability arises where directors fail to prevent the company incurring debts when there are reasonable grounds to suspect the company was insolvent. This is shown in a number of landmark cases. Friedrich (Which shows that directors become personally liable for debts incurred during insolvent trading), Morley, Brosnan (States that the director…

    • 28895 Words
    • 116 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The separate legal entity has its roots in the landmark case of the English House of Lord in Salomon v. A Salomon & Co Ltd. Aron Salomon is a leather merchant and wholesale boot manufacturer trading on his sole account. In year 1892, he decided to change his business to a limited company. The company purchase the business for £39,000 and £20,000 was being transferred into the business as fully paid shares. £10,000 was paid in debentures and £1,000 was received by Aron Salomon to discharge the debts and liabilities during the…

    • 2734 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays