inductive and abductive reasoning in the context of cyber forensics analysis. Processes that assist in developing a case hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. Validation processes that check and test the correctness of the digital evidence exhibits and their relationships with corroborating evidence relied on in legal cases. Processes that would enhance the communication of and presentation of case analysis to the legal practitioner and courts. Deductive‚ inductive and abductive reasoning in the
Premium Forensic science Scientific method Inductive reasoning
Humans often feel the fundamental oddity to find and give an explanation for everything around them. Some people would say ‘that it’s in our blood’. Others say that this characteristic separates humans from the rest of the animal kingdom. Our ability to ‘explain’ events‚ clauses‚ ideas and items gives us the capability to contemplate occurrences to bring different areas of knowledge into a higher and ample stature. In these areas of knowledge that we acquire through the process of explanation
Premium Scientific method Abductive reasoning Inductive reasoning
perpetrator. Methods of inquiry used in criminal investigation are; who‚ what‚ where‚ when‚ why and how. It is a method of inquiry that is based on gathering observable‚ empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. It is a part of scientific methods‚ and they are used as part of a criminal investigations to achieve a number of goals‚ but the biggest goal is of which is usually to determine the perpetrator of a crime and the perpetrators motive was/is. The
Premium Scientific method Science Abductive reasoning
STRATEGIC THINKING CONSTRUCTS Dr Colin Benjamin OAM © 2012 INTRODUCTION The work shop is designed to provide clarity about the language of social inclusion and social policy formulation for practitioners seeking to efficiently‚ effectively and effulgently apply processes of strategic thinking to achieve environmental changes. This set of strategic thinking constructs provides a platform for the design and construction
Premium Inductive reasoning Deductive reasoning Reasoning
M3.26 Managing Performance 1. Briefly explain your role in performance management a. Ensure staff is clear about what is expected from them b. Setting smart objectives to ensure they are fully focused on what they have to do c. Monitoring progress of objectives set and offer guidelines and advice how to complete them. d. Offer the staff with the resources to achieve the objectives such as training‚ one on one coaching and also time. e. Give feedback
Premium Explanation Abductive reasoning Management
MATTER | METHOD | Phase 1 | | PROCEDURE AND ENCOUNTER WITH THE PROBLEM | | Today we are going to play a game called inquiry process. It is a game where everyone can take part. | (Tr. Explains the inquiry procedure to the students) | RULE OF INQUIRY | (Students can ask teacher to repeat procedure if they don’t understand) | The question should be phrased in such a way that they can be answered in Yes or No. You can discuss among yourself. | (tr. States rule of inquiry
Premium Bone fracture Inductive reasoning Abductive reasoning
sometimes narrowly defined as the faculty or process of drawing logical inferences. From Aristotle onwards‚ such reasoning has been classified as either deductive reasoning‚ meaning "from the general to the particular"‚ or inductive reasoning‚ meaning "from the particular to the general". In the 19th century‚ Charles Peirce‚ an American philosopher‚ added a third classification‚ abductive reasoning‚ by which he meant "from the best available information to the best explanation"‚ which has become an important
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
’Does "Ideal Speech" ever really take place? ’ Introduction Ideal Speech is a philosophical theory developed by scholar Jurgen Habermas. It is a form of communication that is based on norms of truth‚ freedom and justice‚ which underlie the conditions for engaging in understandable and truthful dialogue (Badillo‚ 1991‚ p. 19). It requires what we would think of as "fair play" in dialogue. All participants must have equal opportunity to participate. They must have the right to assert‚ defend or question
Premium Sociology
it certainly does reject the use of guessing and intuition in arriving at conclusions. 2. Good research is logical: This implies that research is guided by the rules of logical reasoning and the logical process of induction and deduction are of great value in carrying out research. Induction is the process of reasoning from a part
Premium Reasoning Scientific method Deductive reasoning
* LOGIC Logic has two meanings: first‚ it describes the use of valid reasoning where it is used in most intellectual activities‚ including philosophy and science‚ or‚ second‚ it describes the study of modes of reasoning (those that are valid‚ and those that are fallacious). It is primarily studied in the disciplines of philosophy‚ mathematics‚ semantics‚ and computer science. It examines general forms that arguments may take. In mathematics‚ it is the study of valid inferences within some formal
Premium Logic Reasoning