LAW 443 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF LAW COURSE CODE: Law 443 COURSE TITLE: Administrative Law I 1 LAW 443 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW I Course Code: Course Title: Course Developer/Writer: Administrative Law I Law 443 Simeon Igbinedion‚ LL.B.‚ LL.M.‚ B.L.‚ PH.D.‚ Faculty of Law‚ University of Lagos. Professor Animi Awah Ifidon Oyakhiromen‚ LL.B‚ LLM‚ M.Phil‚ Ph.D‚ BL Course Editor: AG. Dean‚/Programme Leader: Course Coordinator:
Premium Administrative law Law Government agency
......................................... 45 Discussion ................................................................................... 45 Applicable Rules .................................................................... 45 Florida Case Law
Premium Judgment Appeal Civil procedure
of property • Trespass - direct an unlawful interference with possession of person‚ property or land‚ regardless or intention of trespasser Tortes verses contract law • Tort law - special relationship other than a contract which forms the basis of civil claims (e.g. Patient/doctor‚ parent/child) • Contract law - legally binding agreement forms the basis of the civil claim • For a tort to be successful - plaintiff must prove existence of certain elements that give rise to
Premium Tort
Basic rules of international humanitarian law in armed conflicts The seven fundamental rules which are the basis of The Geneva Conventions and the Additional Protocols. This tex has been prepared for dissemination purposes and cannot in any circumstances serve as a substitute for the complete provisions of the international agreements - Extract from "Basic rules of the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols" [pic]1 - Persons hors de combat and those who do not take a direct part in
Premium Geneva Conventions Laws of war Human rights
LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 265 EMPLOYMENT ACT 1955 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION‚ MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF LAWS ACT 1968 IN COLLABORATION WITH PERCETAKAN NASIONAL MALAYSIA BHD 2006 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT 265 EMPLOYMENT ACT 1955 First enacted … Revised … … … … … … … … … 1955 (F.M. Ordinance No. 38 of 1955) 1981 (Act 265 w.e.f. 18 February 1982) PREVIOUS REPRINTS First Reprint Second
Premium Employment
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
‘’Critically evaluate and analyse the extent to which the UK’s legal framework offers adequate protection for the victims of age discrimination’’. INTRODUCTION Age discrimination in employment is a complex issue which impacts many areas of Government policy and has many implications for individuals themselves.1 Age discrimination can occur across all spectrums of employment and can affect both young and old.2 Age discrimination can affect a person’s chances of getting a job‚ and potentially
Premium Discrimination Retirement Aging
sheet. Learner name: Jessica Mather Assessor name: Gill Draper Issue date: 11/11/2014 Submission date: 21/11/2014 Submitted on: 21/11/2014 Programme: Extended Diploma in Uniformed Public Services Unit: Unit 17 Police Powers in the Public Services Assignment reference and title: Unit 17‚ Task 1.1‚ 1.2‚ 1.3‚ 1.4 Please list the evidence submitted for each task. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found or describe the nature of the evidence (e.g. video‚ illustration). Task
Premium Police Crime Criminal law
Business Law Tutorial 6 1. Void contract is defined in Section 2(g) of Contracts act‚ 1950 as an agreement which is not enforceable by the law‚ which gives rise to no rights or obligations. Under Section 11 of Contracts Act‚ 1950‚ every person is competent to contract who is of age of majority‚ and who is of sound mind and is not disqualifying from contracting by any law to which he is subject to. The Age of Majority Act‚ 1971 states that the age of majority is 18. The Privy Council in MOhori
Premium Contract Contract law
DR. RAM MANOHAR LOHIYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY‚ LUCKNOW B.A. LL.B. (HONS.) IX SEMESTER SUBJECT: Law And Morality Seminar Paper TOPIC: Hart Fuller Debate (Tussle Between Law and Moral Values) UNDER THE GUIDENCE OF: SUBMITTED BY: Dr. A P Singh ANKIT KR MISHRA Professor
Free Common law Law