Preview

‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
638 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)
‘How far was Henrys foreign policy merely defensive in the years between 1487 and 1509?’ (24 marks)

Henry worked hard to establish, consolidate and recover many foreign relations within his reign. This was mostly defensive due to pretenders threatening Henry’s throne which meant a lot of Henry’s foreign relations were defensive. However, Henry did also establish policies to help other factors during his reign.
One way in which Henry did establish relations out of defence was to rid of short term pretenders and threats to his throne. An example of this would be the Treaty of Etaples which was made in 1492 with France. This treaty outlined neither country would support imposters which resulted in France having to stop supporting and give up Perkin Warbeck who was at the time pretending to be Richard, Duke of York. The treaty was a defensive manoeuvre to ensure the pretender was stopped to reduce the threat to Henry’s throne and this helped Henry a lot as France did not particularly like Henry at the time so the Treaty meant they would no longer support Warbeck which helped Henry protect his security well.
However, some of Henry’s actions could have been seen as an attack rather than defence. The treaty of Etaples also meant Henry demanded money resulting in France had to pay an annual pension of 50,000 crowns (£5,000). The money was given due to Henry reasserting an ancient claim to French lands and besieging Boulogne which was quite assertive and was this part of the treaty was more of an attack towards France. This is why it is debatable whether Henry was more defensive or attacking in foreign policy as the Treaty of Etaples did both as it forced France to give up pretenders, protecting Henry, but also demanding money, an attack of France. However, it is clear that indeed, henry did use the treaty to attack France but overall used it as a defence.
Another reason Henry instated foreign policy completely as a defence was to secure his dynasty through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In addition Henry signed the treaty of Etaples with France, the most dominating country which had the biggest chance of overthrowing Henry; they used trading as a form of bargaining which meant their trading relations were inconsistent. By signing the treaty of Etaples it meant that France was not allowed to back any pretenders and both countries had to agree to reduce restrictions on trade. Their relationship improved significantly and it also led to France in 1495 to end all the restrictions to secure English neutrality in the Italian…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many successes of their (Henry and Wolsey’s) foreign policy. Wolsey was a successful peace broker, and the treaty of London in 1518 was a great example of him ability. This treaty in 1518 was an agreement of peace which seemed to put England in to the centre of diplomatic affairs in Europe (which was what Henry wanted). The treaty bound France, Spain, the Papacy, HRE and England against the Turkish. At the time it seemed like a great success as it seemed to signify the end of fear of England being isolated in Europe, however in the long term it failed despite the short term success.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gaining international recognition and influence for England was a big part of Henry’s foreign policy; this was because England had not been an active part of European affairs since the end of the hundred year’s war in 1453. So with Henry’s ascension to the throne and wanting to make g his mark this was a very important factor on judging how effective the foreign policy was because this was one of the more consistent of the factors of the foreign policy from 1515 to 1529. An example was in 1513 Henry gained Tournai and Therouanne, this is a good example of how the foreign policy was effective as Tournai was a significant achievement as although it wasn’t a city of great economic or strategic importance it was internationally known therefore bringing England prestige, this would add to the international recognition got England. The capture of Therouanne in the same year also meant that Henry was gaining…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry had great success when dealing with The Yorkshire Rebellion 1498. It occurred when conflict between the Earl of Northumberland and the people of Northumberland and York sparked. The people were reluctant to pay more taxes and the Earl of Northumberland was killed when explaining about the situation...this is when the rebellion began. Henry was able to stop the rebellion quickly and swiftly, the leader of the rebellion was hung along with him accomplices, showing how Henry was able to deal with challenges to his authority smoothly and efficiently. The Yorkshire Rebellion was a local affair that did little to threaten the security of the realm therefore Henry was fully successful in dealing with this challenge.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source C (by David Grossell) is undoubtedly the most obvious of the three sources for showing agreement with the suggestion that Henry and Wolsey conducted an effective foreign policy in the years 1515-30, however source C also shows a disagreement with this suggestion as it states that “English diplomacy.... Failed to bring great gains to the county” Grossell is clearly talking about the amicable grant and its failure, as the amicable grant consequently lead to England forming an alliance with France whilst leaving the alliance they had with Spain. As a result of this England in 1529 were sidelined from any European affairs going on at that time period which most definitely would have had negative implications for England.…

    • 768 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry would rather confront the issue then push it away. He rather takes the consequences than anything. “We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded” he uses parallelism to let them know how much they have done, shown from different perspectives to let Britain know that he is serious.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By 1541, the risk of invasion had decreased, but the renewed rivalry between Francis I and Charles V in 1542 compelled Henry to form an alliance with the Habsburgs against France. In 1544, Henry reached a high point in his foreign policy by conquering Boulogne during a military campaign in Calais. The Treaty of Ardres in 1546 showed how intricate European alliances were. Even though Henry kept Boulogne and was promised a renewal of payments of…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    the king to protect France. Despite the Duke of York appearing to be a much better alternative to…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    George Washington faced some few yet significant issues regarding the foreign affairs policy of the United States after becoming the first president of the United States of America. It had to do with the war between France and England that took place in the year 1793. The vinculum of the United States with the war was ineluctable as it was involved in trade relations with France. As a result, the British army had seized American ships that were carrying on the trade process with France. At this point of time, the United States needed to take an immediate decision that had to do with the extent of its participation in the war between France and England. Many people in the United States advocated the idea of United States supporting France in the war against England as France had done so for the United States in the 1770s nevertheless the United States did not do that. In fact, it signed a peace treaty with Britain, which was deemed unfair by many people but President George Washington took a prudent step at this juncture, fully aware of the fact that the United States was not capable of affording another war against England.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the British and French broke out into war, Jefferson tried to improve Anglo-French relations, however he was embarrassed by France’s refusal to do…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Riel

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He also helped the French a bit...maybe without him knowing, but he still did. He murdered Thomas Scott, an Englishman, which the French despised. So he was considered a hero to the french as well.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays