Preview

The Bill of Rights Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
434 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Bill of Rights Essay Example
U4L1: The Bill of Rights 1. What were opponents of the US Constitution concerned about the role and behavior of the Central Government would be? The opponents were concerned with tyranny by the central government since the wound of the British Government was still fresh.

2. What did the opponents demand from the supporters of the US Constitution?
The supporters demanded for a Bill of Rights that could show the people what immunities each citizen has.

3. What was topic of each of the two proposed amendments not ratified along with the Bill of Rights? The first topic dealt with the number of constituents for each Representative and also the compensation of Congressmen. 4. Today what would we call James Madison’s support for the Bill of Rights? We would call James Madison’s support for the Bill of Rights a campaign conversation.

5. What was James Madison’s private reservation about the Bill of Rights? James Madison’s private reservation was not only necessary but its adoption would persuade moderate Antifederalists that the Constitution wasn’t a formula for tyranny. 6. Click here to research the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Restate in your own words what the major provision(s) are for each of the first ten. (10 points) • 1st Amendment: Freedom of speech, religion, and the press. • 2nd Amendment: Right to bear arms. • 3rd Amendment: The Gov. won’t force you to house troops in your home. • 4th Amendment: The right to protect against unreasonable search and seizure. • 5th Amendment: People accused of crimes still have rights. • 6th Amendment: You have the right to a fair and speedy trail, a jury of your peers. You are to appear in the state and district in which the crime was committed, you will be informed of the nature and what you’re being accused for. You will be able to confront the witnesses against you and you can obtain witnesses of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    APUSH mcw ch 10

    • 3052 Words
    • 16 Pages

    5. One of the major criticisms of the Constitution as drafted in Philadelphia was that it…

    • 3052 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A newly developed constitution brought upon adverse opinions as to its “new republic form being as enshrined” as well as it being a “danger”. Both oppositional and approval views were discussed within Madison Federalist No. 10 and Patrick Henry’s Speech against Ratification.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • What are the roles of Committees in Congress and why would a member of Congress want to be on a specific Committee?…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hi list of my future

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Based off your reading of the Federalist Papers 1, 10, 51, 70, 78, and 85 answer the…

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    English Final Review

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. Thomas Jefferson described life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as __unalienable___ rights because they could not be taken away.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents repeatedly charged that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to tyranny by the central government. Fresh in their minds was the memory of the British violation of civil rights before and during the Revolution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Charter of rights and freedoms spans from Canada's original Constitution, the British North America Act, was passed in 1867 by British Parliament. This was also known as the Constitution Act of 1867, this act founded Canada as a nation. This Act gave elected governments the highest power over political and legal institutions in the country. Power was distributed between the Federal and Provincial governments. Unlike the United States Constitution, there was no "Bill of Rights" that the government had to follow.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After a new Constitution, intended to replace the Articles of Confederation, it was agreed that it would go into effect when nine of the thirteen states had approved it in ratifying conventions. There ensued a nationwide debate over constitutional principles, and the press was overwhelmed with letters condemning or praising the documents. The three men chief among them Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a lliberal central government that would replace the states rights and on individual liberties. All strong nationalists argued that most important the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and together in the national interest.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 1st Amendment

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I am writing about the 1st amendment in this project.I am in the view of a lawmaker so I have to chose the best one for my prospective as of a law maker.And I thought the 1st amendment was the best. Also my team chose to Canada as our country where we are making are laws, but we only got to chose 5 amendments.We pick the 1st of course, the 3rd ,the 4th ,the 5th ,and the 8th.We have one teacher two lawmakers and 2 citizens in our group.To learn more keep on reading.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. For the Federalists, Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. In the ratification debate, the Anti Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays