Preview

Patrick Henry's Speech Against Ratification

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patrick Henry's Speech Against Ratification
Writing Prompt 2
A newly developed constitution brought upon adverse opinions as to its “new republic form being as enshrined” as well as it being a “danger”. Both oppositional and approval views were discussed within Madison Federalist No. 10 and Patrick Henry’s Speech against Ratification.
Patrick Henry viewed the new constitution with an opposition in which he believed that it gave too much power to the central government at the expense of the state governments. His fear, and great anti-federalist views were rooted in his assumption that in the long term, officials wound inevitably misappropriate and abuse the power granted to them. “Did we not know of the fallibility of human nature,” he told the Richmond delegates, “we might rely on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry’s argument on declaring independence on Great Britain and going to war was an inspiring speech that has shined a new light on the subject of whether to declare independence or stay loyal to a country that has done us more harm than good and has ultimately led me to become a rebel. I have become a rebel for two main reasons, our petitions that they have not noticed were an attempt at peace and the mistreatment from the last ten years. To start, petitions had not been productive whatsoever. When Britain had done something that had made us miserable, we decided to meet in the middle and make peace with Britain though petitions. Unfortunately Britain had ignored and disregarded us and our petitions, and instead, had sent us harm and…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution had an essentially negative view of human nature. Those advocating for a strong, centralized “federal” government, were concerned that a pure democracy could be could be taken over by a populous mob. Those advocating for a limited, weak, central government were concerned that too much power concentrated in a federal structure could lead to tyranny. While the framers approached the crafting of the Constitution from a two different perspectives, they held a common belief about their fellow man: that man with too much power may become corrupt, and will abuse that power at the expense of others.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry's Speech

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Obviously reading about Patrick Henry is like a flash back to the revolution era. His Speeches are one of the best in America because Patrick Henry motivates the people of Virginia to fight for liberty. That speech made him famous and nowadays he is in the History books . Truly, Patrick Henry is one of the greatest American authors because of his writing style and affect on history . “He spoke without any notes in a voice that became louder and louder, climaxing with the now famous ending. Following his speech, the vote was taken in which his resolutions passed by a narrow margin, and thus Virginia joined in the American Revolution”.(“Patrick Henry.” )…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Roche presents in his essay, the talent apparent in the constitutionalist that met in Philadelphia was superior amongst other groups, which Roche concludes as an advantage. The fundamental need for an ardent group has been a key component of the formation of the United States, acting as the composers of the prosperous future. Roche may consider this formation an advantage due to the authenticity presented, as their reluctance to divert “original” ambitions to pursue an unpremeditated approach of government (Roche 15). The ascendancy they asserted was within reason as the conditions under the Articles and in 1787 presented the need for a convention, likewise promoting the ratification of the Constitution. Of the defects presented in the time…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 1987

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the 1850’s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it has created. This was shown by interpretations of the constitution and other documents when the constitution was assorted together.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    history 7a

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PAPERS: You will be required to write two three-to-five page BOOK REVIEWS (not book reports!) based on a book you have read (Please refer to the accompanying bibliography). Please choose a book on a topic that interests you and read it. More information will follow.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Charles A. Beard’s article, “Framing the Constitution,” he suggested that there is a dichotomy between the values of the Constitution and those of the Declaration of Independence, who believed that the Constitution was a document that was only created to protect the framers’ wealth. He articulated that the reason rich framers wanted to protect against majority rule was to prevent the majority from overthrowing the rich. His purpose was to examine the circumstances and conflicting goals and ideals of the time, and how they were resolved and agreed upon in the Constitution. His analysis was very persuasive, as it effectively argued that importance of the circumstances at hand, as well as comprehensive, in that in articulates the issues and solutions of the time.…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, the historical fact remains that Virginia did accept the constitution, and during a time in which ratification was not a foregone conclusion. The success of the Federalist movement in Virginia begs the question, were the writings and actions of the Anti-Federalists indelibly relevant to the course of American history? I argue that the answer is unquestionably yes, for while they did not successfully refute the Federalist cause, they created a space for the address of their own concerns in the push for the Bill of Rights. The intensity of Anti-Federalist fervor and complexity of its concerns made the issue of forming a bill of rights even more pressing for the founding fathers. Thus, in its formation, the Virginia Anti-Federalist movement achieved success in its own right.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factions’ right to hold opinions, no matter how controversial, should not be infringed upon, but majorities should not be given unregulated power over the polls. A “well constructed” Union is the mode of controlling the faction, it would allow for the wisdom of officials to discern the best path for their country. Overall, Madison makes solid arguments on the benefits of a representative, constitutional republic and displays an understanding of the inherit cruelty of human…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many debated over the ratification of the U.S. constitution. Some of the individuals that agreed with the ratification of the Constitution were well taught philosophical people like Washington. There were also others who disagreed with the ratification of the U.S Constitution because they thought differ to what the Constitution has to offer to them. This essay will further explain the concepts of the disagreement between those who wanted to ratify the Constitution and those who did not.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays