Preview

Supreme Court Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Essay Example
AP Government

For over 60 years, the Supreme Court has been making crucial decisions in controversial cases. There are many factors that affect the court’s and the judge’s opinion. Public opinion is the voice of the people. Can courts diverge too far from public opinion? The Supreme Court cannot derive too far from public opinion on many controversial cases but can certainly where appropriate.

Controversial cases such as abortion, homosexuality, and death penalty receive a great influence from the public opinion and thus it is hard for the Supreme Court to diverge from. Looking at Gregg v Georgia(1976), a highly controversial case had a public opinion for the death penalty at 72%. Looking at the case historically, the courts have always attempted to avoid capital punishment. The idea of it being “cruel” and “unusual” really favored it being unconstitutional, but the high public opinion approval of capital punishment that had just given the edge.

Can the Supreme Court stray away too far from the public opinion? We can certainly say yes. U.S Term Limits v. Thorton(1995), was a case where Supreme Court ruled that states cannot impose qualifications for prospective members of the U.S. Congress stricter than those specified in the Constitution. The public opinion favored Thorton as high as 77%. The Supreme Court found it appropriate, because it violated a principle which consisted of right to choose representatives belonged to the people and not the states. After carefully examining the case, the Supreme Court went against the public opinion.

The relationship between the Supreme Court and public opinion is very unique. When one of the most recent controversial cases Lawrence v Texas(2003) occurred, the public opinion played a role bigger than ever. The 50% “maybe” answer from public opinion to struck down the sodomy law in Texas, made it even more controversial. The issue of “morality” is where it regarded the public opinion, but the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In a monumental 1972 decision by the US Supreme Court, all but a few death penalty statutes in the United States were declared unconstitutional” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). Four years later the Supreme Court reversed its course toward abolition by approving several newly enacted capital statutes. By 1999, there were “some 3500 men and 50 women on death rows in 38 states and two federal jurisdictions” (Radelet & Borg, 2000, page 1). The author describes how there has been fluctuations in the general population opinion regarding the death penalty since its reintroduction in 1976. While the majority of the American public supports the death penalty, recent studies have shown that this support has diminished a little.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to each case before the court. These decisions then affect public policy and application of the laws. Sometimes laws can be rendered nullified or unenforceable. In some newer cases that deal with internet or other technologies not present at the time of creation, extend beyond the reach of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must interpret how the Constitutional laws should affect the case. This affects the way U. S. society sees the Constitution as it pertains to them.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Supreme Court is, for all intents and purposes, the final authority on legal matters regarding the federal or state governments. Additionally, the Supreme Court asks as the determining body to the constitutionality of laws made by either the federal or state governments. As such an authority, the Supreme Court is often faced with cases that emulate previous cases. At times the Court upholds its decisions, often times due to the concept of stare decisis or precedence, and other times the Court reverses its opinion. The most common reasons that the Court may overturn its decisions include: a shift if the ideology of the court, a shift in the political climate of the United States, or a change in the social culture has rendered a law or previous decision ineffective. Despite the list of possible motivators for the Court to reverse a decision, it is still uncommon to do so. Many of the factors that could contribute to a decision reversal also have the potential to be the reason the…

    • 2261 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people inhibit morals and hold different classes of ethics, which plays heavily in choosing between right and wrong or fair and unfair. These decisions grow more difficult as time goes on. When considering which Supreme Court case I wanted to research, the thought of picking the death penalty topic originally swayed me. I did not want to pick such a controversial subject, but I grew more and more intrigued as I read deeper into the case of Gregg vs. Georgia in 1976. The case stirred up many views about capital punishment and allowing a criminal to manipulate the wording of our country’s Constitution to refuse personal responsibility. Throughout the research and trying to form an opinion of the case, I wondered if the death penalty is:…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today ' s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year ' s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation ' s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” Through this statement it is obvious that Justice Stevens believes that the Federal Courts has no place in interfering on state voter laws and that the decision that was made by the majority of US Supreme Court Justices will negatively influence the perception of the Supreme Court. Justice Stevens is supported by Justice Breyer: “…the Court is not acting to vindicate a fundamental constitutional principle, such as the need to protect a basic human liberty. No other strong reason to act is present. Congressional statutes tend to obviate the need. And, above all, in this highly politicized matter, the appearance of a split decision runs the risk of undermining the public ' s confidence in the Court itself. That confidence is a public treasure. It has…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in the First Amendment to the Constitution. So why do we need to be concerned…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I do believe this is true. Judicial decisions reject political motives in judicial making because the court operated on judicial impartiality and judicial independence which holds the court and judges to law without being under the influence of governmental or political agencies. Judicial independence is most important for maintain individuals rights for all citizens. The Supreme Court does not like to overturn established laws of congress but in turn will be able to overturn state rights principles.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very important to know how far the rule of free speech can go and some of its acceptions. Many things in the world can take offense to a group of people or just one thing can offend one person. There will always be something that another person disagrees with but every person has the right to free speech. The problem within the Supreme Court is the point at which something might offend one person or a group of people, but others are acceptable to it. Bok claims that the acts are “insensitive and unwise,” but are permitted and lawfully legal (Barnet and Bedau 66).…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judiciary plays an important role in shaping public policy. They hold the power in the decision making. They are the ones that can restrict or expand the power of the government administrators and officials so that they are consistent with past court decisions, with governmental principles, and (sometimes) with the fundamental constitutional rights of citizens. (Chambers & Wedel, 2005) There are many social and organizational policies that are affected by what the judicial systems decides. The first thing to remember is that the courts must decide who is right when two parties are needing to find out which side of the situation is right. The second thing is that the courts can shape and frame social policy in regard to administration rulings as well as legislation. And the final thing is that practitioners need to understand that attitude that the courts have when they are…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Broken Promises

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages

    after going to the Supreme Court, one of its most controversial clauses survived the ruling. This…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    should death penalty

    • 1914 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is often cited, as its placement in Taking Sides implies, to be one of the nation痴 most controversial issues. The long history of capital punishment, the volumes of academic work, and the seeming endless supply of individuals willing to debate for and against it seems to confirm such a proposition. Many seem to believe that a change of just one or two individuals on the Supreme Court would tip the scales back toward those who oppose the death penalty. Surely, such an issue is too controversial for there to be an obvious answer. However, research clearly demonstrates that, not only does the death penalty fail to stir a deep controversy in the nation痴 fabric, but that the answer to the question, should the death penalty be abolished, is remarkably clear.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Possibly, the same is the case with administrative decision making. When the Government is satisfied, based upon the material considered and issues involved, that a given decision is appropriate for a circumstances, it may equivocally be true that it may not satisfy each and every individual concerned with the similar set of issues and therefore there may arise a conflict. History is full of examples and is enriching day by day of the instances in which executive decisions have been challenged on grounds of they being arbitrary,…

    • 3677 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays